America’s oldest Second Amendment News outlet.
RSS feed
The 2025–2026 Supreme Court term and related lower-court litigation could define the next phase of post-Bruen Second Amendment law, from public carry and prohibited-person restrictions to AR-15 bans and the future of NFA registration.
The Supreme Court’s review of United States v. Hemani could determine whether the federal firearm ban for marijuana users under 18 U.S.C. 922(g)(3) has any real historical basis. The case puts one of the most outdated and contested prohibitions in federal gun law squarely in front of the justices.
By refusing to hear Schoenthal v. Raoul, the Supreme Court left standing a Seventh Circuit opinion that treats public transit as a sensitive place and could encourage broader carry bans in crowded public spaces.
New filings in NSSF v. James tell the Supreme Court that New York is trying to bypass PLCAA, revive anti-gun nuisance litigation, and pressure the firearms industry nationwide through lawfare.
Critics argue Chief Justice John Roberts has helped slow or block major Second Amendment cases, leaving key questions from Heller, Bruen, and Rahimi unresolved.
March For Our Lives is backing the federal ban on gun ownership for regular marijuana users as the Supreme Court weighs United States v. Hemani.
New legal filings highlight a growing split among courts over magazine bans, increasing pressure on the Supreme Court to review Duncan v. Bonta and other major Second Amendment cases.
The case sits in limbo at the U.S. Supreme Court, repeatedly relisted for conference without a decision on whether to grant review.
In the corridors of Washington, D.C., whispers of Supreme Court Justice Samuel Alito’s potential retirement have grown into a roar.
The Supreme Court could shut down a Virginia ban. In fact, it could shut down every ban. The important question is: will they?
The Second Amendment is not a suggestion, not a privilege, and not a right that evaporates when lawmakers grow uncomfortable with armed citizens.
Wolford v. Lopez a case before the U.S. Supreme Court is far more consequential—and potentially far more dangerous—than the question formally presented for review.
The Second Amendment does not need to be overruled to be destroyed. It need only be ignored. A Court that refuses to enforce its own rulings invites states to defy them…
After the Supreme Court Bruen decision, which restored rights protected by the Second Amendment, anti-Second Amendment pundits predicted a rise in violent crime and homicides. The opposite has happened.
The Supreme Court’s refusal to hear Missouri Second Amendment Protection Act case marks devastating loss for gun rights.
When the U.S. Supreme Court hears oral arguments on Jan. 20, 2026, in the case of Wolford v. Lopez, they will have a stack of amicus briefs from various gun rights organizations, and a 43-page brief from the U.S. Department of Justice, supporting the plaintiffs
Instead of allowing concealed carry on public-facing private property—think stores, restaurants, and their parking lots—unless the owner says “no,” Hawaii did the opposite. Now it’s banned unless the owner explicitly says “yes.”
Trump is taking the same position as former President Joe Biden, whose administration doggedly defended this gun ban against challenges by marijuana users.
As these court splits widen, the Supreme Court will almost certainly step in. Federal gun laws may eventually be narrowed… That’s not a crisis; it’s a long-overdue correction that puts constitutional rights first.
Supreme Court weighs warrantless home entries in Case v Montana, a ruling that could reshape gun owner rights.
The U.S. Supreme Court has declined to hear Iron Bar Holdings v. Cape, ending a five-year legal fight over whether hunters can “corner-cross” between adjoining parcels of public land without trespassing on private property.
The NRA Supports SCOTUS Petitioners Who Lost Their Gun Rights Because of Nonviolent Offenses: The Cases Give the Justices a Chance to Address a Constitutionally Dubious Policy That Disarms Peaceful Americans
The Supreme Court is gearing up for a major Second Amendment showdown — and attorney Alan Beck is ready to drive a stake through the heart of Hawaii’s so-called “Vampire Rule.”
Justice Gorsuch says lower courts are “never free to defy” SCOTUS—but that’s exactly what anti-gun states are doing after Bruen. If the Court won’t enforce its own rulings, the Second Amendment risks becoming just words on paper.
The failure of the Court to act is not neutrality—it is bowing to tyranny. Masked under slogans like “strong gun laws reduce violence,” the real outcome is disarming…
The Court’s reluctance to hear Snope raises some interesting questions about the Court itself.
I would not wait to decide whether the government can ban the most popular rifle in America. That question is of critical importance to tens of millions of law-abiding AR–15 owners throughout the country. We have avoided deciding it for a full decade …
The ruling is a resounding victory for the rule of law, as it vindicates the principles underlying the Protection of Lawful Commerce in Arms Act, which Congress passed for the very purpose of stopping frivolous lawsuits just like this one.
For the second year in a row, gun control advocates have lost in a unanimous decision at the U.S. Supreme Court. Suck it losers!
If “legal” doors are closed to gun owners, do the prohibitionists really believe there won’t be a critical mass of Americans prepared to defy, and if intolerable pushing persists, to resist?
