Opinion
New York – -(AmmoLand.com)- Not without reason, the founding fathers of the United States were very much concerned with tyranny.
The founders realized the most effective weapon to check the natural inclination of those wielding power to acquire ever more power beyond the limits imposed on them by the Constitution would require an omnipresent armed citizenry. And as they perceived as a self-evident truth that the right of the people to keep and bear arms preexists in man—they etched that Right in stone.
An explicit Bill of God-Given Rights incorporated into the Constitution would make clear to those who serve in Government that what the Divine Creator gave to man, no artificial Government construct can lawfully take from man. For any attempt to do so would be an assault not only on the dignity and autonomy of man but a mortal sin against the will of the Divine Creator. The usurpers of the sovereignty of the American people don’t care about any of that. Their sacrilege against the one true Deity knows no bounds.
They Will Go After Americans’ Firearms As They Must Because An Armed Citizenry Constitutes An Immediate And Dire Threat To The Execution of their Goal: The Imposition Of Tyranny.
The usurpers know that wresting firearms from Americans would be a far more difficult proposition than constraining the right of free speech and association, which they have been doing with relative ease, and abrogating the right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects against unreasonable searches and seizures, which they have already accomplished.
Actions of the Biden-Harris Administration and of the Pelosi-Schumer Congress are a conscious, unmitigated assault on the Constitution, on the Nation, and on its people. Together these actions constitute the imposition of tyranny on the American people.
But….?
Do These Deliberate Acts, Singly Or Collectively Rise To The Level Of Treason As The Word ‘Treason’ Is Defined In The U.S. Constitution And In Federal Statute?
Does the import of the Treason clause the founders wrote into the Constitution extend to the imposition of tyranny on the people? If so, then tyranny amounts to levying war against the people. This means that the levying of war against the people is no less an act of betrayal, i.e. no less an act of treachery against the people, and, therefore, no less treason committed by the Government upon its own people, than is an unlawful levying of war by the people against Government.
But this idea that those individuals serving in Government can, through their actions, commit treason against a people, is a novel concept.
For the treason laws of all other Nations do not admit of a Government action that can constitute a betrayal of the people. But, then, no other nation on Earth has adopted a Bill of Rights that at once establishes fundamental rights that exist intrinsically in the people; a Bill of Rights that serves as both a categorical declaration and an urgent reminder to those that serve in the Government that Government exists solely to serve the people. This means that the People are the Master, and Government is the Servant. It also means that the People are the sole Sovereign of and over the Nation and thence manifestly Sovereign over the Government and that Government is manifestly subservient to the people.
Taking these propositions as axiomatic, i.e., self-evident, true, this means that, as a matter of both law and logic, Government itself, through its actions that harm the people——harms that rise to the level of betrayal of a sacred trust binding Government to service to the people for all time——is unforgivable treason against the people. The people, for their part, have the lawful right and the lawful duty, under the Treason Clause of the U.S. Constitution, to bring those who betray them, to account for their crimes against them.
Absolute control over the free exercise of one’s fundamental rights and disdain for the nation’s Constitution and Laws is the sine qua non of tyranny. This notion of “treason as tyranny of Government directed against its own People” is a thesis that demands further attention and explication.
In upcoming articles, we continue to explore this idea of deliberate imposition of tyranny by High Officials of the Federal Government against the people as implicating the Treason Clause of the U.S. Constitution.
About The Arbalest Quarrel:
Arbalest Group created `The Arbalest Quarrel’ website for a special purpose. That purpose is to educate the American public about recent Federal and State firearms control legislation. No other website, to our knowledge, provides as deep an analysis or as thorough an analysis. Arbalest Group offers this information free.
For more information, visit: www.arbalestquarrel.com.
Rising against the Tyranny of an Authoritarian Regime is not the Constitutional definition of Treason. An Authoritarian Regime that wipes their collective arse with the Constitution, as this current Regime is doing, is the declared Despots of which the Founders spoke of 245 years ago, and by which we were admonished and charged with both the Right and Duty to throw off. Is making War against a Corrupt and Tyrannical government Treason? Not according to our Declaration of Independence. Per that document, the long train of abuses and ursurpations of any Authoritarian Government is ours and ours alone to deal… Read more »
Chuck, Thank you for your comment. It’s spot-on! You are absolutely correct. Rebelling against the tyranny of Government IS NOT TREASON even though many in the Legacy Press and in Social Media DO NOT accept this as true. The reason why is plain: the present Government is systematically dismantling a sovereign, independent Nation-State, and eradicating the sovereignty of the American people over the Government, by blatantly imposing tyranny on the American people. The Harris-Biden Administration knows that several of its policy decisions are patently illegal and unconstitutional. And they are acting against the dictates of the Constitution and Federal Statute… Read more »
There are many atheists and members of non-Christian religions who believe in, and would defend the Bill of Rights with their lives.
Like all those good, peaceful musselmen out there?
“Tyranny is defined as that which is legal for the government but illegal for the citizenry.” a really, really old white guy named Tommy…Tommy Jefferson
Maybe these morons should remember the words of Admiral Yamamoto…ya know, that ‘blade of grass’ thang!
Is it really treason to resist laws that are passed by politicians that are passed in violation to their oath of office and are in violation of the constitution?
lt is treason to pass them.
No. ALL laws repugnant to the Constitution are void. Just as any order given by a judge is void if false or fraudulent information is given to that judge to obtain or render that particular order. This has been the case since Marbury vs. Madison (1803)
Biden/Harris has already committed treason in giving 85 billion dollars of aid and comfort to our enemies. At least those two should be tried for it.
If anyone supporting anti second amendment laws can be found consulting with our enemies, they can also be tried.
You mean, “consorting” with the enemy, don’t you?
Milley did both!
Not of fan of seeing content removed from this site. Me thinks are more rigged & worst than they appear. When good content gets scrubbed away here from the memory hole I’d call that a clue.
Logical paradox. WE have a commonly accepted set of founding documents and principles. We the People tacitly or constructively accept those documents and principles as our governing principles. Along comes a regime, say the Obama or Biden regime who reject those documents and principles. The armed population rises up, resists and overthrows that regime. Someone please explain to me how the People can be held for treason when they are simply putting down traitors, a rogue regime and are doing so to reestablish our founding documents and principles. Treason is against the Constitution and not the regime in power.
Would you really consider this a paradox, or just, We, The People, “circling back around” to the status quo?
Best set of “circle back” I’ve encountered.
We are about to be TOTALLY SCREWED by the supremes. What if they rule for NY in Corlett? Do we cooperate and say 2A is antiquated and the days of 2A protecting all other rights have passed? STOP THE BUY IN!!! It takes an advanced degree to not understand what “SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED” says and every member of the court has an advanced degree. Enough is way too much and we better start reconciling ourselves to the idea that we’re having our country and out rights stolen from our posterity as we stand around with our thumbs up our… Read more »
“EVERY POLITICIAN AND BEAUREAUCRAT HAS A HOME AND FAMILY.”
They aren’t the ones who will arrest you for taking your unregistered semiautomatic rifle to the range.
The people in Australia are fighting the ones who are enforcing the unconscionable mandates and rules.
The “just following orders” club is on the job.
How long do you ex-enforcers think the public is going to allow enforcers to attempt to play that card?
Read Eichmann in Jerusalem. Just following orders, unlawful orders is not a defense.
If:
Many state gun laws are even worse than federal laws;
Federal gun laws are bad;
The BATFE enforces federal gun laws;
The BATFE is bad; and
State, county, city/town enforcers enforce state gun laws.
Then:
Are state, county, city/town enforcers bad?
Yes. They are bad and they need to be made demonstrably aware that they will be held accountable.
Every one of them has a house and family.
Americans hold the matches.
How much “just following orders” and abuse will Americans put up with?
We shall see.
Don’t Be a Pu$$y
You really enjoy calling people pussies.
Please list the people you have murdered and the addresses of the homes you have burned-down.
Liberals we don’t need your shark comments, Your a huge part of the problem
You have concluded I am a “Liberal?”
How am I part of the problem?
Will (“TEX”) – 10/11/21:
“None@None,great comment.You have this moron figured out.”
Reply to Will (“TEX”):
Still no specifics.
Will (“TEX”) – 10/11/21:
“Rev,specifically you’re an idiot!”
Reply to Will (“TEX”):
There you go again.
What “Liberal” (I assume in the current, common meaning of the term – not the classic meaning) policies do you believe I have?
@2,
He is not being a pussy. He is applying the rules of logic to test a theory.
All politicians must go home at night just like their boot lickers,We 2A people will be looking for them unless they start to do the job we hired them for and that first job was to uphold the the Constitution.
If you crossed your fingers when you took your oath to uphold and defend the constitution and then you willingly ignored that oath by violating the constitution under the guise of just following orders YOU / THEY ARE BAD. Period!
As bad as it gets and you can go to hell on the express.
You’re not too bright, are you?
What you wrote is exactly the point I was making about all enforcers (federal, state, county, city/town) who will follow any order to enforce any law against certain people.
Go back and read slowly.
You must not understand the words you write.
I can’t help you, and I’m not going to slow down so you can keep up.
Will (“TEX”) – 10/11/21
“You’ve gotten as good at collecting downvotes as your idiot sidekick Rusky.”
Response to Will (“TEX”):
It’s easy to collect upvotes here Will.
However, civil rights and a smaller, better, less expensive government are important to me, so I’m not going to compromise those values to get upvotes.
Will (“TEX”) – 10/11/21:
“Oh how noble of you. LMFAO!”
Reply to Will (“TEX”);
That’s right Will (“TEX”), I’m not going to complement the people who have stated they want to enforce the registration of semiautomatic rifles and who organized to ensure they can legally do so.
Will (“TEX”):
“@Rev,do you have any life at all other posting nonsense on AMMOLAND all day.You are here from dusk till dawn.”
Reply to Will (“TEX”):
No Will – I get out everyday.
Recently went on a three day back pack trip and spent some time at a cabin (made a couple comments in the morning while there).
How about yourself?
@2, Come on no need for argument ad hominem.
Ok, this is digressing.
@Rev,
You have to sandwich in “State gun laws are bad” to complete the syllogism and maintain parallelism, but I like the logic construct.
Wild Bill,
I did – it was the first item under “IF.”
Why did you address me as “@Rev?”
Will (“TEX”) – 10/11/21:
“Because you are Rev.”
Reply to Will (“TEX”):
No, Will.
Will (“TEX”) – 10/11/21
“Rev,me and WB have known each other for about eight years on AMMOLAND. WB knows Rev and I know Rev.”
Reply to Will (“TEX”):
That’s great.
@JSNMGC, Well, you sure do write like him. I suppose that writing style, word choice, grammar, and thought pattern when taken together aren’t quite like finger prints. Nothing to take offense over.
I’m not The Revelator.
He has a different background.
He has a different view of what is going to happen.
He became angry that I had a different view.
I’m not taking offense, just curious why you addressed me as him. It doesn’t seem like something you would do.
I understand why Will (“TEX”) does it.
@wjd, so glad that your on the net. Someone mentioned this morning that they are a Yankee living in Texas. I am thinking that if they have lived here for a while, and their neighbors like them and their political leaning, then maybe they are not a Yankee anymore.
They may have been a Yankee yesterday, but this morning I’m not so sure.
The order is important just like they taught us in logic class. It still has to be properly sandwiched in. Don’t overlook the parallelism.
@ring, True, but the things that Eichmann was charged with (“Crimes Against Humanity” and “Crimes Against Peace”) were not crimes at the time of his actions, but rather were thought up after the National Socialists lost the war.
So the paradox is “Which is worse doing all those things that everybody knows is shockingly wrong or making up crimes against people that are unpopular after the fact?”
@WB – That’s was not internal crime control. It was simply making a show to paint a veneer of legalize on what should’ve simply be seen as eliminating a dangerous rabid animal. Rabid yote or rabid human, we can discuss legality after their head explodes. Given moral relativism it may be hypocritical of me, but I say morality trumps legality. In fact it’s nowhere near close. Purpose of laws is to codify morality. When done right laws make it easy for everyone to get on the same page without excessive restrictions on individual rights. While I could quibble on a… Read more »
Starting to sound like the pretext to another Nuremburg Trial coming up.
The commies seem to be troubled by this, with all the down-voting I’m seeing…
FREE the posts…
Denver City Council Could Consider More Mushroom Decriminalization “As a progressive city, Denver is already re-imagining local drug enforcement policies and supporting treatment and mental health services over jail for drug offenders. We want to explore how psilocybin can make a positive impact in our communities and in the lives of people who can potentially benefit from responsible use,” says Carolyn Tyler, McCann’s spokesperson. Get caught open carrying in Denver County (a right) and thugs with badges will likely beat you to the ground and haul you off to prison if you’re lucky enough to not get shot dead but… Read more »
Marjorie Taylor Greene
Oct 8
“Democrats seeded chaos and stoked violence in cities all over the country for a year.
Billions in damage, devastating communities, lawlessness & the media cheered it on.
A boy stepped forward when most grown men stayed home.
Remember Kyle Rittenhouse.”
The grown men who were paid to do that job followed orders to not do that job.
Among other uses, the virus was used as an experiment to see:
Even Greene is afraid to actually say that enforcers followed orders to not enforce laws against certain people.
She also didn’t mention that the same category of people who followed orders to not enforce laws against the mostly violent rioters were the ones who arrrested Kyle.
Yeah but people are far too indoctrinated to resist at that level and you know this, that the mass Stockholm Syndrome has them by their nuts. It is so bad that The People are getting booted up the ass from all directions at the same time to create a sense of urgency so The People will grow a set of stones where none exist today. Even Sheriff Clarke is out saying Americans are lazy and complacent, stone-less from not fighting for anything for so long they forgot how to fight and are in essence hiding under their beds afraid of… Read more »
I understand why she didn’t say the obvious.
Many Republican voters (even a large percentage of the ones who voted for Greene) still have some nostalgic notion they are clinging to.
It is changing though – the last year and half has not been a good public relations year for enforcers, teachers, librarians, people wearing green shirts at park service stations, national guard members, county health service employees, etc.
Yep, public relations is a bitch for butt hurt bitches but it’s better than those tough guy patriots that are going to “use their second amendment” as if running into battle with words on paper will kill tyrants. What are they gonna do give them paper cuts. Loool. The second amendment does not apply to semi-auto rifles, nor does it apply to bolt action rifles, pistols or revolvers. The second amendment RESTRICTS GOVERNMENT!!!!! The technology of the firearm is irrelevant along with who’s hand the technology is in also irrelevant when resisting tyrants. The restrictions on government remain the same… Read more »
you left out machine guns, they are what is needed to protect yourself from greater numbers , the technology does not matter, the right is to protect yourself and family, for whatever reason , the police should be issued flint locks
JSNMGC: Have any links to resources for sheriffs & other LEOs seeking justification to honor their oath & civic-moral duty, refuse or decline to enforce & maybe actively oppose unconstitutional, unconscionable, or selectively applied laws, orders & decrees of superior officers, politicians, school board members, etc, maybe arrest those who give the orders or OBEY-ENFORCE them, hopefully with mitigated risk to themselves? Asking for a friend, no joke.
P.S. LOL. Frustrated low-IQ sock puppet crybabies downvote what they’re mentally-unequipped and no longer have ‘authority’ to ‘light up’, don’t want LEOs to know their rights & civic-moral duties.
No, I don’t know of any resources. SAPA laws would give them some protection from federal authorities (“sorry, can’t help you – state law prohibits me from cooperating”). Unions (where applicable) might be helpful. In many cases, they would probably have to go to court – just like private sector employees who do the right thing and get fired. In areas where there is broad support for civil rights, public opinion could help shape the outcome (e.g., sheriff may change his/her mind about an individual deputy who did the right thing if the sheriff sees the voters support the individual… Read more »
Justice Antonin Scalia wrote in the majority opinion in Printz v. United States: We held in New York that Congress cannot compel the States to enact or enforce a federal regulatory program. Today we hold that Congress cannot circumvent that prohibition by conscripting the State’s officers directly. The Federal Government may neither issue directives requiring the States to address particular problems, nor command the States’ officers, or those of their political subdivisions, to administer or enforce a federal regulatory program. It matters not whether policy making is involved, and no case by case weighing of the burdens or benefits is necessary; such commands… Read more »
Excellent. Many thanks!
*
??? Please explain.
States, acting as independent Republics within our Federal Republic have a DUTY to nullify any federal law, regulation or act the is deemed unconstitutional.
but they have to have big stones, that is why there are so few like frank serpico to say no when it is right is to put a gun to the head of the serpent and say stop, most are in it for a paycheck mostly useless, dont even stop reckless drivers too much paperwork
The fact I’ve never seen any evidence to that effect certainly serves to lend credibility to what @JSNMGC writes.
Evidence and example abound of officers obeying orders outside constitutional restrictions, and even making up law should as they go. While @JSNMGC has provided a few examples, there are far more available.
we cant have a do gooder disrupt our riot
you left out the un expected .Some centralist and progressives bought guns lots of them and ammo, even without knowledge of how to use them and which ammo fit what they bought. kind of like the spanish fleet I have 400 guns and no ammo that fits
dont know if it is funny or sad, but they are also the group least likely to have been in military
When asked by panel host Borge Brende whether the World Economic Forum and other Great Reset supporters are “expecting too much too soon from the new president, or is he going to deliver first day on this [sic] topics?,” Kerry responded, “The answer to your question is, no, you’re not expecting too much.” “And yes, it [the Great Reset] will happen,” Kerry continued. “And I think it will happen with greater speed and with greater intensity than a lot of people might imagine. In effect, the citizens of the United States have just done a Great Reset. We’ve done a… Read more »
they make up anything to take as much as they can, the world war they are fostering will help climate change , radioactive rain and worse. They talk like anything they say is true, if that were so I could walk on water, global warming is nothing more than planet returning to it’s normal temp range, ask a geologist what that is they have an answer,you may not like it but science facts not feelings,are what matters. There are possible fixes but truth has to win out , a gossamer film made of the trash plastic is a temporary fix,… Read more »
Simply Refer to the Declaration of Independence and it’s Reference to Tyranny.
The Constitution created the federal government and granted it ONLY certain powers, while specifically barring it from regulating, limiting or interfering with enumerated pre-existing rights.
The degenerates in government have ignored and violated all of the above, and claim simply by voting on something it becomes law and is legitimate, no matter how it violates the restrictions that always exist via the Constitution.
We the People remember that what is repugnant to the Constitution has no legal authority, legitimacy nor power.
“Spot on,that’s a very well written comment” -Will (slurp slurp)
Before you suck up any more, try to realize that “degenerates in gvt [who] ignore & violate” includes ex-enforcers with sock puppet handles like WillTEX who brag about hiding their assets so they “light people up” and violate their rights beyond the pale of “qualified” immunity.
Lol, Colorado cops have to log every contact now in a data base and they have to log their probable cause for the contact in that data base and Attorneys can access the data base to go fishing when they are bored. They can log in and see if there’s a pay day in there when they need money and qualified immunity in Colorado these days is only for honest mistakes not blatant trampling of rights or even if the cops didn’t know the law which is no longer an excuse here. Those 45 point IQ’s are causing them plenty… Read more »
Nice. Colorado? Surprising, given how commie it tilted. My commie sibling lives there. Meh.
Please be clear on who they are, the web of actors is much bigger than the democratic party and or the republican party. The place to start is with every American who has fallen victim to the propaganda that once was the daily news papers to the television broadcast news to today’s modern social media and let us not forget hollywood the land of make believe. The correct term is influencers those paid to spread hate distrust and fear to those weak minded enough to take a knee in the twenty first century.Those children who were taught to speak out… Read more »
“Please be clear on who they are”
They?
“They Will Go After Americans’ Firearms”
“They” are the same people who have been enforcing tens of thousands of gun control laws for decades.
“They” are absolutely convinced “they” are heroes.
Thank “them” for “their” service.
I am very clear on who they are the actor are those who created the Now famous Great Reset this os a long list of names. There are a few very powerful families that control example The Great Reset is the name of the 50th annual meeting of the World Economic Forum (WEF), held in June 2020. It brought together high-profile business and political leaders, convened by Charles, Prince of Wales and the WEF, with the theme of rebuilding society and the economy in a sustainable way following the COVID-19 pandemic.[1] WEF chief executive officer Klaus Schwab described three core components of the Great Reset: the first involves creating… Read more »
Those people aren’t “they.”
https://obamawhitehouse.archives.gov/the-press-office/2017/01/18/remarks-vice-president-joe-biden-world-economic-forum
https://www.nationalreview.com/corner/john-kerry-davos-and-the-great-reset/
john, The people you keep listing are not “they.” To figure out who “they” are ask yourself: Who will make you wear a mask in a vistor station at Yellowstone or force you to leave? Who will make you wear a mask on an airplane or deny you access? Who will allow mostly violent rioters to burn, loot, and take over a police station? Who will arrest you for playing catch with your daughter in an empty park? Who will arrest you for taking a non-compliant (state laws) semiautomatic rifle to a range? Who will call the BATFE for taking… Read more »
If you file a complaint against “them” who will force entry into your home (without a warrant) as retaliation?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0I86-UWcp4E&ab_channel=AudittheAudit
I’d like to know what Roger Katz and his group are doing to educate all the China Joe voters with names ending in ‘stein, ‘berg, and ‘man. Your preaching to the choir here Roger. It’s high time that voting block got the message and started voting in a manner that suggested they understood some lessons in history.
All I Know is that this Idiot Administration has commited Treason and should be held Acountable for it.
And what about the genocide?
Revelation 9:15
King James Version
15 And the four angels were loosed, which were prepared for an hour, and a day, and a month, and a year, for to slay the third part of men.
1)Pfizer
2)Modera
3)Biotech
4)Johnson & Johnson
I hope they’re not that deadly, but there’s already ample evidence they’re far more deadly than covid. No long-term studies, and the short-term ones are crap, omit large classes, hide reactions, no LT followup. I know 2 healthy folks who died, onset w/in 48hrs, another 3 who stroked w/in 48hrs & recovered. MDs deny reactions, won’t enter them in the CDC-VAERS dbase. If it is a depop program I suspect this round gets vax mandates & compliance in place so “The Good Group” (Bill Gates et ilk) can push deadlier jabs later. It’ll be obedient overly-trusting folks dying by vax,… Read more »
Get real choose the virus or the vaccine it is that simple if the population starts dying from the new vaccines the elected will just lie some more nothing new
Get real? Please elaborate.
“if”?
https://gettr.com/post/pdr75u77a5
Funded by taxpayer money and controlled research by the CDC
Look at what else “they” go after and look at the crimes “they” commit to hide their crimes against humanity. “They” have been doing this for thousands of years. “They” are no different today than “they” have always been. “They” have legalized their crimes and criminalized pre-existing Biblical human rights so “they” can continue their war against all living things because “they” are evil. “They” are just doing their job that “they” thrive to do.
https://gettr.com/post/pdbxn2bf54
“They” would strike down these truths because there is no limit to what “they” will not do to protect themselves and what “they” do.
“They Will Go After Americans’ Firearms”
“They?”
“They” effectively = WillTEX, neathug, WB & others who make excuses for Just Following Orders.
OBEY
These articles provide one of the forms of incongruity here that is so funny.
Enforcers and ex-enforcers (even from the LAPD of all places) pile on – “yeah – they will go after Ameicans’ Firearms!”
They are they.
@JSNMGC, You should disassociate from 8r. He is neither logical nor literate. He just makes up poison about people.
Wild Bill,
A lot of people are angry.
Some express that anger the way Russn8r does, others express their anger through sarcasm and other means.
You have not disassociated yourself from Will (“TEX”) and he is part of the problem. He has come right out and admitted he is so petty and vindictive he would use the power of his badge to retaliate against people with whom he disagrees.
People like Russn8r are not going to ruin (or end) my life.
People like Will (“TEX”) are a significant risk.
To a large extent, those arguments occurred at a time when my “too old to to compute” would not let me sign on here. So I was not part of that.
8r would not ruin my noon meal, much less anything of significance.
Will (“TEX”) made his points in the last day and a half. Like I said, people express themselves differently, but if we could discuss just one point without all the emotion it might clear the air. A large percentage of people in law enforcement (not federal) have demonstrated time and time again they will follow any order to enforce any law against the people they are ordered to enforce them against. They have also demonstrated they will follow orders to not enforce laws against other people. A large percentage of people in law enforcement are like Will (“TEX”) – they… Read more »
Lame excuse. You’re trying to cancel me on the pretext of a fraction of what you & your foul-mouth sock puppet thug enforcer pals dish out when you troll me, crying about getting back a bit of what you put in.
My most recent offense was having the nerve to reply to your callous slavery-apologist trolling. You claim my position on that is ‘irrational, illiterate & amateur’, but you’re unable to show why, and of course somehow that’s non-toxic.
Make your Southern-Democrat-slaver-apologist case to Clarence Thomas, Mark Robinson, Candace Owen, Billy Prempeh etc. What a hoot that would be.
P.S. “JSNMGC is just as sick as his moron sidekick he can just spell better.” -WillTEX
Here’s your chance to call out one of your locals-only ex-enforcer sock puppet pals for the toxicity you pretend to be so upset over, OldWildBillMan.
As if you don’t know WillTEX as much as admitted yesterday to having abused his badge & gun to “light people up”.
Crickets Chirping.
Chirp…Chirp…Chirp..
Will (“TEX”) – 10/9/21:
“@WB,Revelator (JSNMGC) is just as sick as his moron sidekick he can just spell better.They are cut out of the same piece of cloth and worth no ones time. I sure seemed to have made a lasting impression on REV though.”
Reply to Will (“TEX”):
You are a caricature of bad law enforcement and a cautionary example of why law enforcement should be kept on a short leash – held tightly by civilians.
Not-so-qualified immunity is like fertilizer for growing bad apples.
Edited to add: almost forgot to quote you before you destroyed the evidence.
Any american taking up arms at the order of the government will face a very unkind armed american public. That is not the revolution the revolution is underway sponsored by the democratic party here in the united states. covid 19 mandates list will grow.
john,
American enforcers have been taking up arms (against civilians) at the order of the government (Democrats and Republicans) for a very long time.
Can’t quit the leftist M.O., can you? Snark-trolling, coy dissembling, projection, ‘popularity’ (& logic) determined by the sock puppet votes of foul-mouth, threating, thuggish enforcers. You can’t acknowledge your own toxicity or theirs. Read your own posts & drop the “cancel everyone I disagree with” crybaby act.
The United Nations that was easy …..
No john, “they” are your local enforcers – the same people who have been enforcing the tens of thousands of gun control laws for decades.
The biggest “conspiracy” is right in front of your eyes.
Exactly, without LOCAL enforcement THEY would control absolutely nothing nor anyone.
Is there any doubt that (if he still had the power) Will (“TEX”) would arrest people he didn’t like for violating a state gun control law? Any doubt that he would call the BATFE on someone who bought a made-in-Texas suppressor in Texas without going through the federal process?
He said he would give two weeks pay to use a broken tail light law to escalate matters and “light up” someone with whom he disagreed on the internet.
More laws give more discretionary power to a large percentage of enforcers who have proven they should not have that power.
My Bde. and Corps. Commander’s orders always made so much sense that I never had to make excuses. Why are you attributing actions to me that never happened? What is a “neathug”?