Rep. Eric Swalwell Perpetuates Biden’s Anti-Gun Lies

By Larry Keane

California Flag Guns Gun Control
A repeated ploy of the gun control movement is to loudly proclaim law-abiding Second Amendment supporters are using “scare tactics”. IMG iStock 884191010

U.S.A. -(AmmoLand.com)- A repeated ploy of the gun control movement is to loudly proclaim law-abiding Second Amendment supporters are using “scare tactics” while opposing proposed gun control.

U.S. Rep. Eric Swalwell (D-Calif.), the “Honey Pot Congressman,” isn’t new to this charade. His record is one of strict gun control support. That includes a failed presidential campaign playing second fiddle to Robert Francis “Beto” O’Rourke to carry the gun control water.

Rep. Swalwell published an op-ed in Newsweek and deployed the ruse.

“For decades, one of the most tried and true scare tactics by the gun lobby is that the government—specifically Democrats—are coming for your guns,” the Congressman wrote. “These misinformation campaigns have been used for years to scare law-abiding Americans into thinking they are going to be put under government surveillance to confiscate their guns.”

Lies About Lies

The thrust of Rep. Swalwell’s anti-Second Amendment screed is that President Joe Biden isn’t interested in confiscating lawfully-owned firearms.

“Let’s be crystal clear—the Biden administration has no secret plan to take away your guns,” he claimed.

He’s right, though – President Biden’s gun control plans aren’t secret. They’re publicly known and repeated often.

President Biden has on multiple occasions called the lawful firearm industry the enemy.” A major selling point of his gun control agenda is that he claims he’s, “the only one to have taken on the industry and won.” “I’ve done it before and I’ll do it again,” he’s said.

The president was speaking about his ability to pass a ban on Modern Sporting Rifles (MSRs), which he incorrectly and pejoratively terms as “assault weapons.” President Biden, in the 1990s, when he was in the U.S. Senate, voted to ban America’s most popular selling centerfire semiautomatic rifle. He continues to push for a new ban today on commonly-owned firearms. He claims the ban will drive down crime, but data from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) says the “Assault Weapons Ban (AWB)…did not reduce crime rates.” In fact, when the ban expired, violent crime rates continued to drop even as MSR ownership skyrocketed to more than 20 million rifles in circulation.

The president has also repeated his favorite lie that the firearm industry is “the only outfit in the country that is immune,” from liability. This lie has been fact-checked into oblivion, with the media saying, “Gun manufacturers can certainly be sued…Biden is wrong to say gun manufacturers are alone.”

The president lies about his wishes to ban certain lawfully-manufactured and legally-purchased firearms, as well as his wishes to shut down an entire industry that supports the ability of Americans to exercise their Second Amendment rights. That would certainly qualify as, “taking away guns.”

Twisting Truth

Rep. Swalwell would ban MSRs as well and he’s not alone. He’d go even further, telling Fox News’s Tucker Carlson he’d implement a forced government buyback scheme of the firearms and even, “criminally prosecute any who choose to defy it by keeping their weapons.” Rep. Swalwell went so far as to absurdly suggest if Americans still refused to give up their firearms to a government confiscation scheme, the U.S. government would use nukes against holdouts.

Rep. Swalwell would make confiscation easier, if he had his way, by requiring a national firearm registry. That’s the only way a universal background check could work, a policy that both Rep. Swalwell and President Biden support. Universal background checks (UBCs) are unenforceable without mandatory registration – which is illegal under the 1986 Gun Control Act and 1993 Brady Act.

In his op-ed, Rep. Swalwell says claims about a national gun registry are “conspiracy theories,” and that, “The simple truth is that a gun registry does not exist and is not even being contemplated to illegally track law-abiding individuals who exercise their Second Amendment rights.” He even twists one of my tweets to suggest the firearm industry agrees with his bogus claims.

It’s true – the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and Explosives (ATF) does not currently maintain a searchable national firearm registry. It does, however, keep an Out-of-business Records (OBR) database to trace firearms when they are used in a crime. That collection of records doesn’t allow anyone to run a search for how many and what kind of firearms are owned by any one individual.

About 30 percent of all firearm traces involve searching OBR data. The most recent ATF trace data shows that the average time between when a firearm was originally sold lawfully after a background check and before it was recovered by law enforcement has been close to 10 years as recently as 2017. Searching very old records rarely yields actionable intelligence to law enforcement. That’s why NSSF has long supported requiring ATF to purge records that are older than 20 years to save taxpayer money and to use those dollars to put more agents on the streets to stop crime from occurring in the first place.

Rep. Swalwell knowingly took the tweet out of context in order to lie again about what would be required if a universal background check were to be adopted.

President Biden is clearly doing the bidding of his gun control donors. After repeating his lies about the firearm industry and what his policies would do to law-abiding Americans, there is no doubt that President Biden would indeed go after lawful gun owners and dismantle the industry that provides for the exercise of the Second Amendment. Rep. Swalwell is simply carrying the president’s gun control water because he would do the same exact thing.


About The National Shooting Sports Foundation

NSSF is the trade association for the firearm industry. Its mission is to promote, protect and preserve hunting and shooting sports. Formed in 1961, NSSF has a membership of thousands of manufacturers, distributors, firearm retailers, shooting ranges, sportsmen’s organizations, and publishers nationwide. For more information, visit nssf.org

National Shooting Sports Foundation

19 Comments
Most Voted
Newest Oldest
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
UncAl

“Swallowell”, isn’t he the dirt-bag that got a “bang-bang from fang-fang”? Cali-it’s time to flush the toilet!

Boz

AII Iiars wiII pay.

Wild Bill

I wish that it were so.

Russn8r

Then you’d be in big trouble, with all your projection, stalking and smears.

Wild Bill

I believe that he wrote that liars will pay. He did not mention projection, stalking, or smearing. Each of which you seemingly can not refrain from.

Russn8r

More projection by the master stalker.

GomeznSA

I only have one question for fang fang’s boyfriend – what guns would you ‘allow’ us mere mortals to possess?
Shoot (pun intended) – even slow joe (apparently) has no problem with shotguns since he ‘thinks’ it is okay to shoot them into the air – or thru the front door.

GmanNM

I have a problem with anyone believing that AFT does NOT have a searchable database – regarding the author’s statement “It’s true – the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and Explosives (ATF) does not currently maintain a searchable national firearm registry.”. We have seen so many lies, deceiving statements to congress, secret task forces (eg. Fast & Furious) and just plain illegal stuff from and associated with ATF. To actually BELIEVE anything coming from ATF is not safe for our civil liberties. With a seemingly unlimited budget and a billion firearms sales records, I think the safe bet is that… Read more »

Last edited 1 year ago by GmanNM
mlhtd51

Two {2} kinds of people in the World Today. Ones you Need and sonsabitches you Don’t Need. Swallowwell fits in the latter bracket, along with his friends. Enough Said.

CharlieKing1

Why is this clown Swallowswell carrying Slo’ Joe’s water?

Maybe Swallowswell’s mind is too clouded from that honeypot from China?

Or maybe he’s trying so hard to retain his gas so he doesn’t embarrass himself on national TV again could be clouding his mind?

Either way, he deserves a whole bunch of Pinocchios!

gregs

leftists use scary words, ambiguous words (assault weapons, large capacity weapons, semi-automatic machine guns, silencers, ghost guns) to intimidate people into supporting their agenda. they are truthful in that they say they are not interested in confiscating your firearms, YET! that is what a “universal background check” is for, knowing who has what and where. batfe doesn’t yet have a searchable database (that we know of) but why do you think they changed the 4473 to have all pertinent information, purchaser, weapon, address, on the same page? facts/data/statistics do not matter to government agents, just look at the wuhan protocols… Read more »

Happy Everafter

The latest SCARY term upsetting the trembling nail-biting hand-wringing sobbing leftist cowering Bloomberg-idolizing commie liars is……
GHOST GUN!!!

Last edited 1 year ago by Happy Everafter
DIYinSTL

Why are we wasting time writing or reading about fart-boy?

Russn8r

LOL

Henry Bowman

You triggered a couple commies… Let me assist with my own contribution!

Russn8r

LOL. Nice.

Henry Bowman

You’re on target; you are getting 2-3 downvotes per.

If I knew who they are they were they would get a blanket party!!

Wild Bill

That is why all votes from national to local to this very site are secret.

Russn8r

Pretty clear who the Oathbreaker posse members are. When they do write something, it’s 100% projection-deflection.