Washington Democrats Pass Semi-Auto Ban, Bill Goes to Governor’s Desk

Washington’s Democrat-controlled Legislature has banned the future manufacture, sale, import and transfer of so-called “assault rifles.”

Washington Democrats finally passed legislation to ban the future sale, import, and manufacture of so-called “assault weapons” and the gun prohibition lobby is celebrating, despite the fact that gun rights organizations have been preparing legal challenges and were poised to launch court battles.

The Second Amendment Foundation, which is headquartered in Bellevue, Washington, will likely be at the forefront of the legal fight. SAF is already involved in challenges to bans in Maryland and California, and the ban on so-called “high capacity magazines” in Oregon.

By a vote of 56-42, the House passed House Bill 1240, with floor amendments added in the Senate allowing firearms dealers to sell or transfer firearms that were manufactured prior to Jan. 1 of this year, and only to clients out-of-state, “for the limited period of 90 days after the effective date of this section.”

There is also an exemption for people who inherit such a firearm, with this caveat: “A person who legally receives an assault weapon under this subsection may not sell or transfer the assault weapon to any other person in this state other than to a licensed dealer, to a federally licensed gunsmith for the purpose of service or repair, or to a law enforcement agency for the purpose of permanently relinquishing the assault weapon.”

Democrat Attorney General Bob Ferguson, who has been seeking a ban for the past few years quickly went on Twitter to declare, “With today’s historic final approval in the House, Washington will become the 10th state to ban the sale of assault weapons. Thanks to the tireless work of advocates…”

There was no small irony in the fact that the ban was passed on April 19, the 248th anniversary of the Battles of Lexington and Concord, Massachusetts in 1775 when British troops were dispatched to seize arms and ammunition belonging to the Colonial militia. It was the event that ignited the Revolutionary War and led to the inclusion of the Second Amendment when the Constitution was adopted in 1791.

There was some scrambling in the Legislature to pass the 15-page bill prior to April 20, the anniversary of the 1999 Columbine High School attack in Littleton, Colorado.

According to the Associated Press and Seattle Times, which incorrectly described the banned guns as “high-powered firearms,” the new law will immediately ban more than 50 specific gun models. The ban does not apply to sales to law enforcement agencies or the military in Washington state, and it also does not ban possession of guns already owned by an unknown number of Evergreen State residents.

Democrat Gov. Jay Inslee, a perennial anti-gunner since his days in Congress, is eager to sign the bill.

One other thing noted by the AP and Times is this: “President Joe Biden and other Democrats have become increasingly emboldened in pushing for stronger gun controls — and doing so with no clear electoral consequences.”

Republican lawmakers uniformly opposed the ban. According to the AP story, some argued school buildings should be made hard targets via remodeling as a way to address school shootings, rather than infringe on the rights of law-abiding citizens. But Democrats, who have been drifting farther to the political left in recent years, were in no mood to listen, rejecting several proposed amendments earlier in the week.

Inslee tweeted Wednesday, “WA does not and will not accept gun violence as normal. Banning the sale of assault weapons, our bill to enact training requirements and a wait period, and the bill to improve accountability of manufacturers and retailers will save lives.”

Washington gun rights activists will remember this, because it is the same sort of rhetoric that preceded passage of gun control Initiatives 594 (in 2014) and I-1639 (in 2018) which were both promoted to voters as ways to reduce so-called “gun violence.” But just the opposite has been the case as the number of homicides has risen since 2015, the first full year in which I-594—requiring so-called “universal background checks”—was in effect.

According to the FBI Uniform Crime Report for 2015, there were 209 homicides in Washington including 141 involving firearms. In 2021, the most recent year for which FBI data is available, the state reported 325 murders that year, including 209 committed with firearms.


About Dave Workman

Dave Workman is a senior editor at TheGunMag.com and Liberty Park Press, author of multiple books on the Right to Keep & Bear Arms, and formerly an NRA-certified firearms instructor.

Dave Workman

51 Comments
Most Voted
Newest Oldest
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Arizona

This isn’t about safety, as it doesn’t remove a single gun already in the hands of millions in the state. Not that confiscation would be legal, and neither is this ban. SCOTUS will have to rule on “assault weapon” bans even though they already ruled common use and historical record which along with the 2nd’s clear language invalidates any ban. The Left is intent on inciting civil war.

Colt

And just like that, Aero Precision USA is out of business in Washington. I have stacks of stripped lowers in my safe.. bought them over the years, every time some lib ratcheted up their anti constitution rhetoric. I like Aero, since the other part of their business is aerospace, I feel the quality is top notch.. The upper and lowers mate up real nice with tight fit on them. I think I’ve heard Aero is talking with Idaho about moving their production across the state line. Colorado did the same thing to Magpul. Musk moves Telsa HQ. Even democrats want… Read more »

KK

It’s strange that democrats are so concerned for our Constitutional right to vote that even showing ID would be an overbearing roadblock and inhibit the right, and no concern for election integrity is worth the chance of inhibiting the right. Yet they pile roadblock after roadblock in front of our Constitutional right to keep and bear arms, under the guise that they are worried about OUR safety. (As they release violent criminals to prey upon society) So, is it that they are concerned about our rights and safety? Or is it that: ASPIRING TOTALITARIANS LIKE TO CHEAT IN ELECTIONS AND… Read more »

GAMtns

Remember: Marxists are delusional.

nrringlee

The irony goes far beyond the anniversary of Lexington and Concord. The irony is the vilification of lawful gun owners who lose their rights because the offspring of the Progressive New Left runs amok in our land. When you gut a culture of values and virtues, eliminate the most fundamental of understandings about man and God you get pandemonium. That is what we have now. We are back to the Days of Lot and the Days of Noah because we have rejected the most fundamental understandings of what it means to be human. Life has no meaning for those who… Read more »

Novice.but.learning

Fwiw, this ‘ban’ includes anyone who moves to WA from another state, or US territory where semi-auto rifles are legal. There was a last minute push in the legislature to allow active military an exemption, but that amendment was voted down in the State House of Reps. This law could have a similar effect on people traveling through Washington as the gotcha states of NY and NJ where people who might be stuck overnight because of flights cancelled for any reason and who get their checked lugguage so they have undies and a tooth brush are suddenly committing a crime… Read more »

Last edited 2 years ago by Novice.but.learning
Oldman

The next bill here in WA state will probably be to ban .223/5.56, 9mm, 40SW, 308 and anything that will run in any semi-auto. And yes, Arizona, they have to have a civil war and win, cuz that is the ONLY way China can take us over.

Mac

And the MORONS wrapped in STUPID don’t think that the Supreme Court will strike it down!

Hazcat

This was enacted under the emergency powers act so that it could go into effect as soon as it was signed. It’s that important! … So why is Inslee sitting on his thumbs waiting to sign it? I thought that this was an ’emergency”!

Answer: Gotta line up the celebs to be there for the signing. They are busy people and getting all their schedules to match isn’t easy!

Rowboat

Let the lawsuits begin !!!!
Wow, they really know how to fritter away your tax money, don’t they ?
Like New York, Carnalfornia, etc..
Giving a BIG middle finger to SCOTUS !!!