Hawaii Concedes CCW Fight in Blake Day vs Hawaii ~ VIDEO

In an oh-so-satisfying victory for Second Amendment supporters in Hawaii, Blake Day has successfully navigated through the challenging waters of Hawaii’s restrictive gun permit policies, securing his fundamental right to carry a concealed firearm. This triumph, marked by the relentless dedication of attorney Alan Beck and his legal squad, serves as a lighthouse of hope for citizens nationwide fighting tooth and nail for their constitutional liberties.

At the epicenter of this legal battle is the narrative of Blake Day, an individual whose initial pursuit to secure a concealed carry permit hit a wall, thanks to Hawaii’s infamously stringent gun laws.

Day’s bid was knocked back due to his role in a non-violent skirmish, a scenario he defended as an act of self-preservation. This rebuff triggered a legal showdown that not only scrutinized the constitutionality of Hawaii’s stance on gun control but also carved out a potential roadmap for addressing Second Amendment disputes in the future.

The situation took a dramatic turn when the County of Hawaii, historically known for never issuing a concealed carry permit, found itself at a crossroads.

The watershed Supreme Court decision in NYSRPA v Bruen served as a clarion call, highlighting the essential need to grant permits for concealed handguns. This directive was met with reluctance, as the county had previously erected a maze of policies effectively curbing the rights of its residents.

In the above video Mark Smith, a constitutional attorney and esteemed Ammoland News contributor, offered a deep dive into this landmark legal skirmish. Smith astutely drew comparisons between the indomitable spirit of freedom that characterized the World War II era and the contemporary crusade to safeguard Second Amendment rights. He underscored the vital need for persistence, advocating for a brick-by-brick, inch-by-inch, man-by-man battle for freedom.

At the heart of Day’s legal victory was a critical argument against the discretionary power wielded by licensing officials. The Supreme Court, through its ruling in NYSRPA v Bruen, called for the establishment of objective, precise, and unambiguous criteria in the permit issuance process, thereby stripping away any room for subjective discretion that could potentially violate constitutional rights.

This case signifies a crucial juncture for gun rights in Hawaii and, by extension, the entire United States. It accentuates the critical role of the judiciary in safeguarding individual liberties and shines a spotlight on the ongoing tussle between state-imposed regulations and the rights enshrined in the Constitution. The success of Blake Day, thanks to the acumen of attorney Alan Beck, doesn’t just validate the individual’s right to self-defense; it lays down a marker for future Second Amendment litigation.

Reflecting on this milestone, it’s imperative to grasp the wider repercussions for gun owners and advocates of constitutional rights. This episode serves as a potent reminder of the formidable power of legal recourse in championing and propelling our freedoms forward. The quest for Second Amendment rights, akin to the historical battles for liberty and justice, remains a live issue, demanding the commitment and bravery of figures like Blake Day and legal luminaries like Alan Beck.

Wrapping up, Blake Day’s victory in the lush landscapes of Hawaii transcends personal achievement; it’s a resounding win for all Americans who hold their constitutional rights dear. It reaffirms the undying importance of standing tall in the face of challenges and relentlessly pushing forward in our quest for freedom, piece by piece, brick by brick.

9 Comments
Most Voted
Newest Oldest
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
CBW

All fine and good. But the permit to carry is written in the Constitution. Anything else is Infringement.

Bubba

What is this going to do for future people applying for a CCW in Hawaii?
Are they going to be met with the same resistance up until the same point in the legal battle?
My guess is yes this doesn’t really change anything in the actual battle.
Until the Supreme Court abolishes the ATF And the gun control act of 68 and the NFA we are still fטcked for life.

Tionico

A,ota high falun’ words with no real content. So jus wha exactly WAS the “stick” that whacked Hawaii’s government over the head and forced them, kicking and screaming, to issue the stinking Mother May I Card? And is this the dam shattering, so now the rest of Hawaii’s ersttwhile second class unarmed citizens can now line up ti get theirs without years of sandbagging and buckes of legl dollars poured down the loo simply because the state can hold out their grubby paw to get more lawyerbucks frm their residents.?? Further how (if it even does) will this one man’s… Read more »

DC

Unfortunately, many governing bodies these days just design new workarounds to infringe on our rights. NY and CA, after Heller and Bruen, expanded “sensitive places” to include almost everywhere, imposed other restrictions, and thumbed their noses at the Supreme Court. It’s a long fight, but I think one of our first goals should be to elect a pro-2A president and congress. The president then should be encouraged to condemn the anti’s actions at a state of the union address, where he won’t be censored (hopefully). He should cite gun facts that people will never otherwise hear on mainstream media, and… Read more »

Vince

Thank You, Blake Day!

Mac

You fail to tell us just how the attorney won this victory. What did he do?