IL: Cook County Ban on So-Called “Assault Weapons” is Unconstitutional

Unconstitutional
Unconstitutional! iStock

The Second Amendment Foundation has filed an appellants brief with the Seventh U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in the continuing challenge of the ban on so-called “assault weapons” in Cook County, Illinois.

Joining SAF in its appeal from U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois are two private citizens, Cutberto Viramontes and Christopher Khaya. They are represented by attorneys David H. Thompson, Peter A. Patterson and William V. Bergstrom with Cooper & Kirk, PLLC, Washington, D.C. The case, filed originally in 2021, is known as Viramontes v. Cook County.

“The question presented in this case is straightforward,” noted SAF founder and Executive Vice President Alan M. Gottlieb, “whether the Second Amendment permits the government to ban the best-selling rifles in America and similar semiautomatic firearms erroneously labeled as ‘assault weapons.’ We maintain the answer to that clearly is no.”

“Modern semiautomatic rifles are commonly used for all kinds of lawful purposes,” said SAF Executive Director Adam Kraut. “While millions of Americans own tens of millions of them, such rifles are used in a tiny fraction of all homicides, according to FBI data. They are used for self-defense, hunting, predator control, competition and recreation, and there can be no doubt they are protected by the Second Amendment.”

The case has actually been “on hold” for the past couple of years, during which the Supreme Court handed down the 2022 Bruen decision, and the Illinois Legislature passed a statewide ban on so-called “assault weapons” in January 2023. Plaintiffs had asked the court to stay the case pending resolution of the Illinois ban’s constitutionality, but the court declined to grant a stay.

“It’s time for a resolution to this case,” Kraut observed.


Second Amendment Foundation

The Second Amendment Foundation (saf.org) is the nation’s oldest and largest tax-exempt education, research, publishing and legal action group focusing on the Constitutional right and heritage to privately own and possess firearms. Founded in 1974, The Foundation has grown to more than 720,000 members and supporters and conducts many programs designed to better inform the public about the consequences of gun control.

Second Amendment Foundation

14 Comments
Most Voted
Newest Oldest
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Arizona

We the People are entitled to every type of arms: the horrible implements of war are OUR BIRTHRIGHT! From M4’s to select fire UMP’s & MP5SD’s, from belt fed SAW’s to bolt action 308’s, from trench knives to katanas and tomahawks. Every weapon can be used in war, or in self-defense, protection of property, or to fend off looters, invaders and foreign soldiers. The government was specifically prohibited from infringing on this right in any manner. Any limit, restriction, prohibition, licensing or permit prerequisite is UNCONSTITUTIONAL and without any lawful authority. Period.

swmft

need to form a constitutional enforcement police and start taking out the trash, leo governor judge whatever violate peoples rights visit big house or renounce citizenship and leave

hasbeen

constitutionality has nothing to do with. it is what the criminal politicians are told to do and we know the politicians sold out to the “highest bidder” and don’t care about the USA r you. why do you keep voting for these traitors? are you that stupid? guess so.

musicman44mag

Gee, I seem to remember a 10 year ban on the sale of AR style guns and after it was over they discontinued the ban. Do they remember why?

PMinFl

From the back of the choir, preach on but turn around and preach to the rest of the society. We already know that this ban is unconstitutional.