America’s oldest Second Amendment News outlet.
RSS feed
The NRA Foundation, was created by the NRA to fund NRA programs. The money was raised from NRA members, under the NRA name, for the express purpose of supporting NRA programs.
NRA programs have been thrown into jeopardy by the foundation’s current leaders, mostly former NRA directors who were allied with prior leadership [Wayne LaPierre] and who presided over scandals and financial improprieties.
The Second Amendment Foundation has shown they can win real battles where it counts and make positive change for gun owners. We’re proud to continue to support SAF…
“In no other context would the American people tolerate limiting the civil rights of adults based solely on their age,” said SAF Executive Director Adam Kraut.
Once again, they are attempting to violate landmark Supreme Court decisions and disarm law-abiding citizens by banning some of the most commonly owned handguns in America. This flagrant violation of rights cannot, and will not, go unchecked.
In what could become one of the most consequential Second Amendment battles in decades, a coalition of gun-rights organizations have filed a new lawsuit challenging the constitutionality of the National Firearms Act of 1934 (NFA).
…applicants for concealed carry licenses were forced to wait an average of 281 days (over nine months) before even the initial processing of their applications began, “with some waiting as long as 1,030 days (nearly three years).”
The previous ruling “blessed New Jersey’s effort to designate as ‘sensitive places’ nearly everywhere that ordinary human action occurs” and allowed the state to transform a “fundamental constitutional right into a mere privilege.”
The suit claims that the NSSF “received Plaintiffs’ personal information and used it for political purposes—and benefited from doing so.”
The recent federal court rulings striking down the post office gun ban are not just legal footnotes; they are personal. They cut to the core of what it means to be an American who refuses to surrender his rights.
The Department of Justice on Tuesday filed a federal lawsuit against the Los Angeles County Sheriff’s Department, alleging deliberate foot-dragging by the department in processing applications for California concealed carry licenses.
Gun-rights advocates are taking Santa Clara County to court over what they call an “outrageous” concealed-carry permit process that makes it nearly impossible for average residents to exercise their rights.
The case challenges California Penal Code 26806 which states “…a licensee shall ensure that its business premises are monitored by a digital video surveillance system…” along with a long list of requirements.
Tennessee has joined a coalition of 25 states asking the U.S. Supreme Court to strike down Massachusetts’ firearm licensing requirements for nonresidents.
The Second Amendment Foundation has filed a motion for summary judgment in its lawsuit challenging Illinois law that bans firearms in homes licensed to provide foster or day care.
AG Miyares is directly involved in fighting the Virginia Citizens Defense League and Gun Owners of America, not just some underling in his office…
Seattle is suing GLOCK and local gun shops over banned “switches,” blaming the manufacturer for criminals illegally modifying pistols. That key fact hasn’t stopped the city from twisting the law into a political weapon against lawful businesses.
The new law enacts a permit-to-purchase scheme for firearms that could take months to process, leaving citizens stuck in bureaucratic limbo…
“If a person chooses to legally use medical marijuana it should not automatically translate to surrendering their Second Amendment rights. We look forward to fighting this restriction and vindicating the rights of those who…”
“The Trump DOJ’s scheme would gut nearly every lawsuit against the federal government unless and until the Supreme Court steps in,” said FPC President Brandon Combs.
The 10th Circuit just struck down New Mexico’s 7-day waiting period, ruling that the Second Amendment protects not only owning guns—but buying them without government-imposed delays.
Two major lawsuits are taking aim at the NFA after Congress cut its suppressor and SBR tax to $0 — but veteran gun-rights lawyer Matt Larosiere says winning won’t be easy….
Citizens are expected to play by the rules in the permitting law, the police administering the scheme are not, giving rise to a reprehensible situation that strips away constitutional rights when they may be most needed.
According to the court, there was not a “clearly established” prohibition against using government power to suppress the NRA’s First Amendment rights by pressuring insurance companies & banks…
The government cannot categorically ban them without first proving a historical tradition of such bans – a burden it cannot meet….
B&T is asking the court to declare SureFire’s patent invalid, affirm its right to sell Rotex suppressor mounts, & award damages. The case has the potential to shake up the U.S. suppressor market for years to come.
At issue are federal laws that ban licensed firearm dealers from selling handguns to buyers who live in another state.
California lawmakers believe they can vote away the fundamental rights of a subset of the adult population, ..But fortunately the rights codified in our Constitution are memorialized there to prevent precisely that sort of behavior.
NJ will lose this as no historical analogue exists for prohibiting adults under 21 from purchasing, acquiring, possessing, or carrying handguns nor for banning otherwise lawful commerce between dealers and adults under 21.
In a bombshell lawsuit filed in federal court, longtime NRA powerhouse is suing the National Rifle Association (NRA), claiming the group she helped build and protect for over 45 years has turned its back on her..
