Research Finds Men Who Own Guns Have Greater Sexual Satisfaction

The rubberized grip, integral comp and a perfect shooting position can only do so much; the Raging Hunter’s recoil impulse is still very stout. IMG Jim Grant

Recent research shows a significant correlation between the possession of guns and a man’s satisfaction with his sexual equipment.

A common fantasy thrown at male gun owners is they are using guns as “compensation” for an undersized penis or sexual disfunction. This speculation has long been a staple of those seeking to discredit the ownership of firearms. This earlier paper gives an overview of the psychosexual insult and its use.

In 2016, an editorial in HuffPost argued that “the compulsion to own firearms stems from an unconscious need to compensate for a deep-seated psychological sense of insecurity and inadequacy in terms of power: in males, specifically for having a small or smaller-than-desired penis” (). In 2020, John Cleese, a famous comedian, quipped on Twitter that “the British are proud that they DON’T [emphasis in original] need a gun to make themselves feel manly” and that Americans need “assault weapons” to “keep ED [erectile dysfunction] away” ().

In a recent paper, researchers decided to test the theory with actual data. The collection of the data was funded by a group that desires to disarm the American population. From newatlas.com:

The researchers disclosed that data collection for the study was financially supported by the organization Change the Ref, whose mission is “Shifting America’s social response to gun violence by uniting creativity, activism, disruption, and education.” The researchers state that although Change the Ref has a clear anti-gun stance, it played no role in the planning or implementation of the study.

The study was published in the American Journal of Men’s Health.

Chart from the recent paper published in the American Journal of Men’s Health.

The results of the study were precisely the opposite of the psychosexual insult thrown at male gun owners. The more male gun owners were satisfied with their penis size, the more they were likely to own guns, to own more guns, and to own “military-style” rifles.

Here is the abstract from the study, bold added. From pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov:

Abstract

In this study, we formally examine the association between penis size dissatisfaction and gun ownership in America. The primary hypothesis, derived from the psychosexual theory of gun ownership, asserts that men who are more dissatisfied with the size of their penises will be more likely to personally own guns. To test this hypothesis, we used data collected from the 2023 Masculinity, Sexual Health, and Politics (MSHAP) survey, a national probability sample of 1,840 men, and regression analyses to model personal gun ownership as a function of penis size dissatisfaction, experiences with penis enlargement, social desirability, masculinity, body mass, mental health, and a range of sociodemographic characteristics. We find that men who are more dissatisfied with the size of their penises are less likely to personally own guns across outcomes, including any gun ownership, military-style rifle ownership, and total number of guns owned. The inverse association between penis size dissatisfaction and gun ownership is linear; however, the association is weakest among men ages 60 and older. With these findings in mind, we failed to observe any differences in personal gun ownership between men who have and have not attempted penis enlargement. To our knowledge, this is the first study to formally examine the association between penis size and personal gun ownership in America. Our findings fail to support the psychosexual theory of gun ownership. Alternative theories are posited for the apparent inverse association between penis size dissatisfaction and personal gun ownership, including higher levels of testosterone and constructionist explanations.

Another fantasy of those who want to control your access to defensive tools has been exposed. The arguments of those who want to prevent people from owning and using guns are fantasy arguments that do not hold up under examination. More guns do not cause more crime. More guns do not cause more suicides. Concealed Carry permit holders are more law-abiding than the police.


About Dean Weingarten:

Dean Weingarten has been a peace officer, a military officer, was on the University of Wisconsin Pistol Team for four years, and was first certified to teach firearms safety in 1973. He taught the Arizona concealed carry course for fifteen years until the goal of Constitutional Carry was attained. He has degrees in meteorology and mining engineering, and retired from the Department of Defense after a 30 year career in Army Research, Development, Testing, and Evaluation.

Dean Weingarten

35 Comments
Most Voted
Newest Oldest
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
swmft

explains why magnum condoms are too small ,and so are my gun safes

Colt

.

gregs

i have a huge arsenal, or so i have been told.

Matt in Oklahoma

People that need to put others down to feel good about themselves aren’t anything anyway.
Simply being a man will get you all you want because there seems to be a shortage of men these days.

musicman44mag

Ok, now how about a study on the women who have the men who own the guns! Do women that own guns have greater sexual satisfaction? Special note. I was in the store the other day and there was a lady at the counter and I walked buy and whispered, buy a gun, she said “I am” I walked buy again and told the guys at the counter ” you guys make sure and sell her something that will take care of business and not a 22″ She laughed and said ” I know better than that” I said oh… Read more »

Marc

Amazing what misfires some gun control groups will spend money on. Sponsors of this one: https://www.influencewatch.org/non-profit/change-the-ref/

Marc

A quick look and you’ll find that this misfire was funded by gun control advocates: https://www.influencewatch.org/non-profit/change-the-ref/

Darkman
OlTrailDog

PS: I’m not shooting blanks, cuz I’m packing ‘bird’ shot. 😉

Roland T. Gunner

John Cleese is 50 years past relevence.