The Second Amendment Foundation has filed a federal lawsuit in Texas challenging the ban on firearms carry in U.S. Post Offices and on postal property as violations of the Second Amendment, and is seeking declaratory and injunctive relief.
Joining SAF is the Firearms Policy Coalition and two private citizens, Gavin Pate and George Mandry, both Texas residents. Named as the sole defendant is Attorney General Merrick Garland, in his official capacity. The complaint was filed in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Texas, Fort Worth Division.
Plaintiffs are represented by attorneys R. Brent Cooper at Cooper & Scully, P.C. in Dallas, and David H. Thompson and Peter A. Patterson at Cooper & Kirk in Washington, D.C.
“Under the Bruen ruling of June 2022,” noted SAF founder and Executive Vice President Alan M. Gottlieb, “if the government seeks to restrict firearms in a particular location as a ‘sensitive place,’ it must prove that its current restriction is sufficiently analogous to a well-established and representative historical analogue.”
“Current federal law bars the ‘knowing possession’ of firearms in federal facilities, which includes post offices,” said SAF Executive Director Adam Kraut. “Millions of legally armed private citizens, whose daily routines may include visits to post offices to pick up or drop off mail, are directly impacted by this infringement. There is no well-established, representative historical analog to justify this regulation, which violates the Second Amendment.”
Complaint Firearms Policy Coalition, Inc., Second Amendment Foundation, Gavin Pate, And George Mandry
About Second Amendment Foundation
The Second Amendment Foundation (saf.org) is the nation’s oldest and largest tax-exempt education, research, publishing and legal action group focusing on the Constitutional right and heritage to privately own and possess firearms. Founded in 1974, The Foundation has grown to more than 720,000 members and supporters and conducts many programs designed to better inform the public about the consequences of gun control.
About time and I hope SAF wins. I’m tired of parking across the street and leaving my sidearm locked in the car.
Hopefully the SAF shows these federal idiots the errors in thier over reaching ways .
This would have been corrected in Congress some years back but for lame brained votes against correction by Begich from Alaska and a few others.
What about the new “extended” background check? Let that be our post office pass credential. Because it sure better be good for something!
Supposed to be clearly posted. It isn’t in my local post office.
18 U.S.C. § 930(a) and 39 C.F.R. § 232.1(l) contradict in some parts. No one on line seems to know that and keep reporting wrongly. I hope the lawyers and judges understand that and come up with a ruling that clears the whole mess out where I can carry my machine gun in to a post office to get some stamps – because that is exactly what I will do.
HLB