Supreme Court Asked to Rule Against Mexico in Lawsuit Targeting Guns

lawfare lawsuits government pigs iStock-udall30 1401677883
iStock-udall30

WASHINGTON, D.C. – Today, Firearms Policy Coalition (FPC) announced the filing of an important merits-stage brief with the United States Supreme Court in Smith & Wesson Brands, Inc., et al. v. Estados Unidos Mexicanos, which seeks to stop Mexico’s attempts to impose its gun control preferences on Americans through frivolous litigation. The brief can be viewed at FPCLegal.org.

What is the case Smith & Wesson Brands, Inc., et al. v. Estados Unidos Mexicanos about?

This case involves a groundbreaking legal battle initiated by the government of Mexico against leading U.S. firearms manufacturers, including Smith & Wesson Brands, Inc., and others. The lawsuit claims that the firearms industry is responsible for the violence perpetrated by Mexican drug cartels. Mexico argues that certain business practices of these companies—such as the production and distribution of firearms, marketing strategies, and failure to implement stricter safety measures—have indirectly facilitated illegal gun trafficking into Mexico, where these weapons are used in cartel-related violence.

Core Issues:

  1. Proximate Cause: The case questions whether the firearms industry’s lawful business activities in the U.S. can be deemed the proximate cause of the violence inflicted by drug cartels in Mexico.
  2. Aiding and Abetting: Mexico alleges that by continuing these practices, the firearms companies knowingly facilitated gun trafficking, constituting “aiding and abetting” criminal activity.

Legal Context:

The case tests the boundaries of the Protection of Lawful Commerce in Arms Act (PLCAA), which generally shields firearms manufacturers from liability for harm caused by third-party misuse of their products. A district court dismissed the case, citing PLCAA protections, but the First Circuit Court of Appeals reversed this decision, allowing the suit to proceed under an exception to the PLCAA that applies when federal or state firearm laws are knowingly violated.

Implications:

Mexico seeks $10 billion in damages and significant injunctive relief, including stricter gun control measures in the U.S., such as banning so-called “assault weapons” and large-capacity magazines. [which are really normal capacity magazines] The lawsuit raises questions about the extent of liability for legal manufacturers regarding the downstream misuse of their products, with potential ripple effects for other industries. Critics argue this could open the floodgates for similar lawsuits globally, challenging long-standing legal norms around proximate cause and product liability.

This high-stakes case underscores a clash between U.S. legal protections for firearms manufacturers and a foreign governments’ efforts to address violence linked to illegally smuggled U.S.-made weapons​

“The financial toll of this abusive litigation has already been devastating to the community—and for one major company, it has been fatal,” argues the brief. “The Court must act now to preserve the statute Congress passed to secure Americans’ access to the tools protected by the Second Amendment—and prevent the industry from being driven out of business.”

“Mexico’s lawsuit is designed to effectively destroy gun rights by eliminating the American firearms ecosystem through frivolous lawfare. Congress enacted the Protection of Lawful Commerce in Arms Act to stop this kind of abusive litigation and ensure individuals had enduring access to the tools necessary for self-defense and other lawful purposes.”

“The Supreme Court should decide against Mexico and make clear that the law means what it says,” said FPC President Brandon Combs.

Protection of Lawful Commerce in Arms Act (PLCAA): Why Are Anti-Gunners so Desperate to Repeal it?


Firearms Policy Coalition

Firearms Policy Coalition (firearmspolicy.org), a 501(c)4 nonprofit membership organization, exists to create a world of maximal human liberty, defend constitutional rights, advance individual liberty, and restore freedom. We work to achieve our strategic objectives through litigation, research, scholarly publications, amicus briefing, legislative and regulatory action, grassroots activism, education, outreach, and other programs. Our FPC Law program (FPCLaw.org) is the nation’s preeminent legal action initiative focused on restoring the right to keep and bear arms throughout the United States. Individuals who want to support FPC’s work to eliminate unconstitutional laws can join the FPC Grassroots Army at JoinFPC.org or make a donation at firearmspolicy.org/donate. For more on FPC’s lawsuits and other pro-Second Amendment initiatives, visit FPCLegal.org and follow FPC on Instagram, X (Twitter), Facebook, and YouTube.

Firearms Policy Coalition

Some of the links on this page are affiliate links, meaning at no additional cost to you, Ammoland will earn a commission if you click through and make a purchase.
22 Comments
Most Voted
Newest Oldest
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Montana454Casull

Time for America to sue Mexico for a100 billion for flooding our country with illegal aliens .

The other Jim

FJB is soon out and likewise FJB’s hate for the U.S. Citizens and his “dump on American Citizen”, and “here is a few billion more U.S. Citizen Dollars for you”, and his “empower the criminal, disarm the law-biding U.S Citizen” agenda’s in an effort to kill and destroy America and U.S. Taxpayer Citizens. There now needs to be fantastic reimbursement to the U.S. Taxpayers and U.S. Government from Mexico in the form of Pam Bondi sueing the Mexican President Claudia Steinbaum and the Mexican Government in Mexican Court for trillions of dollars for the killing of U.S. Citizens willfully thru… Read more »

musicman44mag

Legitimate response: First off, this case should never been allowed and the dumb ass judge that allowed it should be disbarred. Other countries do not tell us what to do and what their people do with our product is their responsibility, not ours. Smart ass answer: Sure, what ever amount you want mexico, we will give it to you because you claim the arms in America going to mexico effects your country because your people do not act responsibly with the guns and we will do it as soon as you pay us first for the drugs you illegally bring… Read more »

Mudhunter

How much should Mexico pay us to wipe out its narco-terrorist crime wave, including prosecuting all corrupt officials and bureaucrats and giving them their just recompense for every murder and bodily injury they have aided and abetted.

What about allowing human/sex trafficking and the assaults and rapes of women and children making their way across their land to the USA?

What about the land areas taken over by them on our side of the border and their corrupt/terrorizing organizations established here?

I’m thinking in the neighborhood of several 100 trillion dollars.

PMinFl

The cartels also drive Toyota pick-ups, does this make Toyota complicit in drug distribution and violence in Mexico?

JohnBored

Mexico has no standing in federal courts to sue any American company. Mexico is responsible for the cartel violence that is ruining their country. Their oppressive gun control has done nothing to curb cartel violence, in fact it has made such violence worse as law abiding Mexican citizens cannot protect themselves because of the repressive gun control laws in Mexico.

Iamnivek

The official narrative is that the Mexico Cartels afe not taken control of Mexicos military, but, they have likely infiltrated local law enforcement.
Which means they already have access to purchasing US and other foreign firearms.

Is this really about American gun violence perpetrated by Mexican drug cartels?
Could it really be that the common people in Mexico have access to guns making it more difficult for the Cartels to do business?
Could this be more about disarming the mexican people while the Cartels will remain armed?

Iamnivek

So, a foreign government is attempting to disarm the american militia.
Japanese Admiral Isoroku Yamamoto: “There would be a rifle behind every blade of grass”
While this is a matter of 2nd amendment rights, It is also a matter of National Security.

Nick

It’s nice to see a 2A group get involved. I hope GOA and SAF do as well. With that much legal firepower it’d be harder for the court to ignore the constitution and the PLCAA.

FtDarling

There has been a move afoot for some time that intends to erode many of our rights away, including support from other countries, many of whom have benefited from our arms support and US military deaths. Mexico is one of them. Smuggling across the Rio Grande dates back many years. I think they have a lot of nerve to sue a very old firearms manufacturing organization for “allowing” and “facilitating” its arms that have been sold in lawful commerce to be smuggled into Mexico.