This Deep Dive is based on the excellent document “Second Amendment Law Applied to Attachments and Modifications to Firearms By Christopher R. Estock,” which was published in association with the Firearms Research Center.
::::
The debate over “assault weapons” is more heated than ever, especially after the landmark Bruen decision by the Supreme Court. Let’s dive into what this means for gun owners and the ongoing battle over gun rights in America.
What’s an ‘Assault Weapon’ Anyway?
First off, the term “assault weapon” gets thrown around a lot, but what does it actually mean?
Legally, it varies—a lot. Federal and state governments can’t seem to agree on a single definition. Some say it’s about features like telescopic stocks and pistol grips, while others list specific models. Federally, it’s about specific features that make a firearm more like those used by the military, such as pistol grips and telescopic stocks. This confusion isn’t just a headache—it affects every gun owner’s rights. States like California and New York define them through an even stricter lens, creating a complex patchwork of laws that can confuse even the most informed gun enthusiasts.
Federal Rules on Assault Weapons
At the federal level, guns like the AR-15 are often labeled as “assault weapons” based on their features—think detachable magazines and military-style components. But here’s the kicker: the specifics are mushy. The rules can be about whether a rifle has one, two, or more of certain features like a folding stock or a grenade launcher attachment.
The federal approach often feels broad and inconsistently applied, leading to significant debate over its effectiveness and fairness.
State By State: A Patchwork of Laws
States like California and New York take it even further. They’ve got their own lists and rules that make the federal guidelines look lax. For instance, California’s regulations include extensive definitions that classify many semi-automatic weapons as assault weapons based on their features alone, often creating a more restrictive environment than found at the federal level.
The Bruen Decision’s Impact
Post-Bruen, the legal landscape is shifting. The Supreme Court’s decision insists that any gun regulation must be rooted in historical tradition—meaning a lot of modern gun control measures could be on shaky ground. This decision could lead to a rollback of some of the more restrictive state regulations on what they call “assault weapons.”
Engage with the Full Story
For those intrigued by these developments, diving deeper into the specifics is crucial. I recommend listening to our detailed discussion in the accompanying audio file and reviewing the original document, “Second Amendment Law Applied to Attachments and Modifications to Firearms,” which inspired this conversation. Both are embedded in this article. They provide a thorough exploration of the legal intricacies and potential implications of the evolving landscape of gun control.
Final Shots
As the dust settles, one thing is clear: the fight over “assault weapons” is far from over. With states pushing back against federal guidelines and the Supreme Court setting new precedents, gun owners need to stay informed and engaged.
Knowing your rights—and the ongoing changes to these rights—is more crucial than ever.
The Militia & the Army in American Constitutional Law ~ DEEP DIVE
Second Amendment Law Applied to Attachments and Modifications to Firearms
If our government honestly and legally followed the Bill of Rights, no laws affecting the purchase, owning and carrying firearms would still be in effect or actually ever have been on the books. The Founders all said the Bill of Rights is a written documentation of GOD Given Rights, which no one shall infringe upon. That means the Government cannot tell you what firearms you can own, it cannot restrict you from carrying a firearm and if you can afford to fed the bullet hog, you should be able to walk in a gun shop and buy an M-60 with… Read more »
Deep dive? Lol, this skinny kid is still changing into his swim trunks.
Good grief, this side of word salad is poorly written, and serves up a plate of sizzle but no steak.
“At the federal level, guns like the AR-15 are often labeled as “assault weapons””. THIS IS A LIE! The term “assault weapon” IS a DREAMED UP TERM by the Anti-American GUN CONTROLLING NAZI organizations. The term “ASSAULT WEAPON” WILL NOT BE DEFINED by ANY of the NAZI organizations.
Two years going on the ban in Illinois. Jaba the Governor will not lie down, his hand picked liberals in the north over turn any case from the south. The tyrant and Crook county need to be exercised from the rest of the state.
In my opinion in order for a weapon to be considered an ” assault weapon” it must have the full auto or 3 shot burst selector . A Semi auto does not qualify as an ” assault weapon” and anyone trying to classify a semi auto in that category is just over reaching and anti gun and anti freedom .