Republicans Change Text of HPA and SHORT Act to Satisfy an Unelected Bureaucrat

Rugged Razor 556 Rifle Silencer IMG Rugged MFG
Rugged Razor 556 Rifle Silencer IMG Rugged MFG

Late Friday night, Republicans introduced new text to the reconciliation bill, trying to satisfy the Senate Parliamentarian’s view on the Byrd Rule. The new text will keep short-barreled rifles (SBRs), short-barreled shotguns (SBSs), any other weapons (AOW), and suppressors under the National Firearms Act of 1934 (NFA), but would reduce the tax stamp fee to $0. Machineguns and destructive devices tax stamp fee will remain $200.

The Byrd rule is named after former U.S. Senator Robert Byrd of West Virginia, a member of the Democratic Party. The Byrd Rule states that only budgetary and tax items can be passed through the reconciliation process. A reconciliation bill differs from a standard bill as only 50 votes are needed to pass it through the Senate. In contrast, any other bill requires a supermajority of 60 votes to pass due to the filibuster. Republicans argued that since the NFA is a tax law, as confirmed by the United States Supreme Court in 1937, it could be changed through reconciliation. Democrats argued that it was a policy issue, not a tax issue, and therefore off-limits to reconciliation.

The Senate Parliamentarian, Elizabeth MacDonough, a Democrat, ruled that the Hearing Protection Act (HPA) and the Stop Harassing Owners of Rifles Today (SHORT) Act violated the Byrd Rule.

She surmised that the tax was intended to help enforce the NFA, rather than the NFA being established to implement the tax, which is an entirely different stance than the Supreme Court took in 1937. Ms. MacDonough has gutted much of Trump’s “One Big Beautiful Bill,” including cutting benefits for illegal immigrants, leading many to call her a partisan hack.

The Senate Parliamentarian serves at the pleasure of the Senate majority leader, who is currently Republican John Thune of South Dakota. Democratic Senator Harry Reid appointed Ms. MacDonough to the position during the Obama administration in 2012. The role is to advise the Senate, and her advice is not binding. Yet, Thune has vowed to follow it. He could choose to ignore her advice or fire her, but neither is likely.

Republicans claim they don’t want to set a precedent of overruling the Parliamentarian, but Democrats have done just that in the past. Judicial appointees used to be able to be blocked using the filibuster, but in 2013, the Democrats changed the rule.

The Parliamentarian said they could not, but then the Majority Leader, Harry Reid, chose to disregard her advice, which was his right to do. Many in the gun world look to Democrats, ignoring the will of the Parliamentarian, in contrast to Republicans giving in to the will of an unelected Democrat, as proof that Republicans lack a backbone.

On Friday, after the Parliamentarian rejected both the SHORT Act and the HPA, gun owners flooded John Thune’s email and office phone lines demanding that the Republican fire MacDonough or ignore her advice. By Friday evening, Thune’s office voicemail was full, and gun owners reported that they were receiving busy signals when attempting to call. Calls placed by AmmoLand to Sen. Thune’s cell phone went directly to voicemail.

Gun Owners of America (GOA), the American Suppressor Association (ASA, the Firearms Policy Coalition (FPC), the Second Amendment Foundation (SAF), the National Rifle Association (NRA), National Association of Sporting Goods Wholesalers (NASGW), and the Firearms and Ammunition Import/Export Roundtable (F.A.I.R.) Trade Group issued a joint letter condemning what they see as the Parliamentarian’s anti-gun partisan actions.

The gun rights groups called MacDonough’s actions “egregious” and said that if the Senate is not willing to overrule the Parliamentarian, it should at least reduce the tax to zero, which appears to be happening.

Sen Thune could still act to fire MacDonough and choose to ignore her advice. Gun owners should know for sure by 2 P.M. Eastern, Saturday, when the Senate will be in session working on the “One Big Beautiful Bill.”

Democrats have vowed to fight the reduction of the tax stamp, claiming that it still violates the Byrd Rule, despite having used the reconciliation process to create the Affordable Care Act. In the end, Republicans might leave it up to an unelected Democratic bureaucrat to decide if they will protect gun rights.

Senate Parliamentarian Removes HPA and SHORT Act from Reconciliation Bill

DOJ Files Amicus Brief Opposing Illinois’ “Assault Weapons” Ban


About John Crump

Mr. Crump is an NRA instructor and a constitutional activist. John has written about firearms, interviewed people from all walks of life, and on the Constitution. John lives in Northern Virginia with his wife and sons, follow him on X at @crumpyss, or at www.crumpy.com.

John Crump

Subscribe
Notify of
164 Comments
Most Voted
Newest Oldest
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
DIYinSTL

It’s not about the effing $200. It about the registration and the government keeping tabs on who owns what. The invasive and egregious process adds insult to injury. Even worse, eliminating the $200 tax removes the option for most or all of legal challenges to their presence in the NFA. If Congress can’t do the job it was elected for, then they can at least leave the tax at $1 to preserve legal avenues for us.

The other Jim

Doublecrossed again by the RINO’s. John Thune is a coward like China Mitch. And he is even going along with the Non-elected Left Democrat MacDonough’s advice to increase Taxpayer’s funding for Medicaid Money for Illegal Aliens free Health Insurance with no copayments no deductibles and no coinsurance. And as usual John Cornyn is bending over.

hoss

That’s the problem, Repubs got no balls!

TexDad

I’d pay $200 to not have to register them.

Arizona

The bill is full of sellouts, to every special interest, from illegals to green new deal crap, banks to genderqueer normalizing. All on your taxes. The left got what they wanted, and the gop screwed us. As they always do. Let them hang in the midterms, stay home or primary em.

Grigori

Not good enough. Eliminating the tax and keeping it NFA will not stop the problems associated with transfer of a SBR/SBS to a relative or leaving one to survivors. Yeah, yeah, I know about “trusts” but who wants to be bothered with that bs? Ditto having to ask BATF’s permission well in advance to transport your SBR/SBS across state lines.