Adamiak’s Attorney Strikes Back at his Criminal Charges

Scales of Justice Gun Laws Court Gavel Judges iStock-Denise Hasse1136158583
Scales of Justice Gun Laws Court Gavel Judges iStock-Denise Hasse1136158583

The criminal case against Patrick “Tate” Adamiak is the first time the government has ever applied the National Firearms Act to a bunch of gun parts that the ATF still allows for unrestricted sale without requiring any federal paperwork or even ID, which somehow led to Adamiak’s 20-year federal prison sentence, his attorney Matthew Larosiere said in a document filed this week with an appellate court.

Larosiere is asking to present his case to the entire U.S. Court of Appeal for the Fourth Circuit, after a panel of three appellate judges heard the case, because “the panel opinion overlooks and misapprehends material facts and controlling law, and because the questions presented are of exceptional importance.”

Larosiere has three main legal issues:

  1. “The panel overlooked or misapprehended the undisputed record evidence that all items underlying Appellant’s convictions were non-functional relics requiring material alteration and fabrication, not mere assembly, to become NFA-subject weapons. This renders the evidence legally insufficient.
  2. The panel misapprehended and failed to address Appellant’s preserved Second Amendment challenge, short-circuiting the Bruen test and treating the challenged conduct as categorically valid without conducting the required inquiry.
  3. The panel insisted that a bill of particulars would have cured the notice issues in the indictment, but it is a settled rule that a bill of particulars cannot save an invalid indictment.”

Larosiere then put the main issues of this case into layman’s terms.

“These issues are exceptionally important because the government is applying the statutes here at issue to items the government has—for decades—explicitly permitted the unrestricted commercial sale,” he wrote. “There has been no intervening change in law, and in fact the very same items Appellant was charged with are still routinely and openly commercially sold.”

For those following this case, that is maddening. The very items that put Adamiak in prison are still sold online. Most don’t even require ID for the sale. As a result, everyone is now at risk.

Not only did the government’s charges result in a 20-year sentence for Adamiak, who had been an active-duty U.S. Navy sailor accepted for SEAL training, they threaten to “criminalize collectors and dealers for possessing inert historical artifacts that are both beyond the scope of the charged statutes and clearly entitled to constitutional protection.”

In other words, if this case is allowed to stand, anyone with gun parts could be subject to arrest by the ATF.

The appellate court panel, which heard Larosiere’s argument last month, failed to note that every single evidentiary item that Adamiak was charged with was “indisputably inert as possessed.”

“The government presented no evidence tying any charged item to a specific definitional pathway. Instead, it invited conviction on the sweeping premise that inert relics and display pieces were either now or could eventually be fabricated into NFA-regulated weapons,” Larosiere wrote in the court document. “None of the items here—cut-up parts, drilled-out training aids, or lawfully held launcher receivers—met any operative definition. The government’s case depended entirely on post-seizure alterations and machinations of the ATF.”

No real evidence

Larosiere destroys the government’s evidence, for which Adamiak is starting the third year of his 20-year sentence, specifically, PPSh-41 parts kits, inert RPG launchers and M-79 and M-203 launchers.

As to the PPSh-41 parts kits, which the government said were machineguns, Larosiere wrote, “The undisputed record establishes that the seized item was nothing more than a cut-up box of surplus parts—an inert collection of metal fragments lawfully imported and sold for decades as non-firearms.”

“ATF’s own witnesses conceded that the parts—whatever they were—were cut into multiple sections, that it could not chamber or fire a cartridge, and that substantial welding and machining would be required before any firing sequence was mechanically possible,” he wrote.

The RPGs, he noted, were “plainly marked ‘TRAINING AID DUMMY.’ Both seized RPG tubes were sold and possessed as inert training aids, bore drilled holes, and lacked any fire-control assembly.”

“The government’s expert admitted that to “fire” a projectile, ATF replaced the handgrip and trigger, inserted a 7.62 mm training insert, and fired a bullet—a caliber wholly unlike a rocket projectile,” he wrote.

Like the RPGs, Adamiak’s M-79 and M-203 parts were heavily reworked by the ATF.

The government’s theory again depended on post-seizure fabrication by ATF. In its testing, the agency assembled these receivers with 40 mm training barrels and cartridges that were never possessed by Adamiak, and only then did it achieve test-fire capability,” Larosiere wrote. “The ATF’s reconstruction created—for the first time—the NFA configuration the government attributed to Adamiak.”

Not one item, for which Adamiak is serving two decades behind bars, was a weapon until the ATF reworked it by adding parts. Therefore, Larosiere said, there is only one legitimate conclusion.

“Because no item in evidence could reasonably be a ‘weapon’ as possessed by appellant, and each required fabrication to do so, the evidence was legally insufficient as a matter of law,” he wrote. “The proper disposition is reversal and entry of judgment of acquittal.”

Massive legal concerns

If the charges against Adamiak are allowed to stand, anyone who owns any legal guns or gun parts could be subject to a search warrant and arrest by the ATF.

Anyone with a legal semi-auto could be charged with illegally possessing a machinegun. Adamiak, it should be repeatedly stressed, faced multiple machinegun charges for legal semi-autos.

Anyone with a toy gun could also be charged with unlawfully possessing a machinegun. The ATF turned Adamiak’s toy STEN submachinegun into a real submachinegun by adding a real STEN receiver and a real STEN barrel. Even though it could only fire one 9mm round after the massive alterations, the ATF called it a machinegun.

Anyone who legally sells any firearm parts could be subjected to an ATF search warrant and arrest, as was Adamiak.

In fact, everyone is now at risk by the ATF.

Apparently, based on Adamiak’s case and several others, all the ATF needs is an informant’s suggestion that you did something wrong and they can kick down your doors, point guns at you and your family, and charge you with federal felonies even though you committed no actual crime.

That is why this case is of such massive importance.

Adamiak’s case is the first time the ATF has ever charged anyone with violating the NFA for a bunch of legal gun parts. Unless action is taken quickly, based on ATF’s own sordid history, it will definitely not be the last.

This story is presented by the Second Amendment Foundation’s Investigative Journalism Project and wouldn’t be possible without you. Please click here to make a tax-deductible donation to support more pro-gun stories like this.

Loudoun Sheriff’s Office Retracts Binary Trigger Claim After Public Backlash

Special Taxes on Firearms are Unconstitutional


About Lee Williams

Lee Williams, who is also known as “The Gun Writer,” is the chief editor of the Second Amendment Foundation’s Investigative Journalism Project. Until recently, he was also an editor for a daily newspaper in Florida. Before becoming an editor, Lee was an investigative reporter at newspapers in three states and a U.S. Territory. Before becoming a journalist, he worked as a police officer. Before becoming a cop, Lee served in the Army. He’s earned more than a dozen national journalism awards as a reporter, and three medals of valor as a cop. Lee is an avid tactical shooter.

Lee Williams


Subscribe
Notify of
29 Comments
Most Voted
Newest Oldest
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Rafal

Red Flag Barbie is allowing the DOJ to go through with this travesty. She needs to go.

Cappy

This assault on the Constitutional rights of each of us needs to be shouted from the mountain tops. If this idiocy stands, each of us is in danger. Following ATF logic, a block of steel in my workshop could be turned into a machinegun with a milling machine and a proper lathe–therefore I am eligible for an extended stay in the Gray Bar Hotel. Lee, thank you for following this story.

Yaza

The ENTIRE ATF needs to be disbanded. It no longer serves a purpose. If they want to control Alcohol and Tobacco, then form a new agency just for that. Firearms, in and of themselves, only need the 2nd Amendment, and we already have that.

Will Munny

The following is a comment from John Van Stry. I copied it from the Substack app under the heading of this article. I think it’s relevant. The ATF did this in the ‘lightning links’ case. They spend hours reworking the links (which were the WRONG size to function and of course had to be cut out). Because THAT case was allowed to stand, now the ATF is legally allowed to use their shops to rework the evidence to gain a conviction. The lightning links case was the test case. Now the law is ‘set’ and good luck overturning it. Someone… Read more »

gregs

everyone involved in this prosecution and abuse of justice should be swinging from a rope, everyone.

Wild Bill

First, what was wrong with that jury?
Second, at times when the federal government can not pay (as during this shutdown), the president has extraordinary authority to furlough people and get rid of entire agencies. Why is he not getting rid of the BATFE?

BK

Thanks Lee for keeping us informed.It’s too bad it takes SOOO Long for cases like this to go through the courts.I believe he will be exonerated, and in the end, through filing lawsuits, He will return to the navy, and be a very wealthy man.

HK Beats Glock

His lawyer needs to read the Vanderstock v Bondi frame/receiver case. The SC explicitly rejected the idea that just by having a semi auto rifle you could be charged with possession of a machine gun. Even if it’s fairly easy to do changing a semi auto rifle into a select fire machine gun. They explicitly referenced the NFA and GCA as not supporting that theory

This would logically seem to apply here, since none of the items in question were functional at the time.

DIYinSTL

All cases require a remedy. The magnitude of the government’s malfeasance it so great that at a minimum: Return or replacement of (NOT compensation for) all seized items in as good or better condition than when seized. If return or replacement is not possible, then replacement with an NFA, transferable, [newly] registered, functional and as good or better equivalent from the ATF’s collection shall be substituted. Removal from the NICS list. All back pay as if he had remained in the Navy and assuming normal advancements, bonuses, and raises plus value of lost opportunity as if invested. All military records… Read more »

2NDforever

thanks for keeping us informed