
U.S.A.– -(AmmoLand.com)- February 14th is the third anniversary of the attack at Marjory Stoneman Douglas High School in Parkland, Florida. If you’re like me, it is uncomfortable to stir that painful memory. I’ve studied that attack because it would be worse to see it repeated simply because we didn’t learn a difficult lesson. You might not remember, but the attack at Columbine High School was almost 22 years ago. The attack at Sandy Hook Elementary School more than 8 years ago. That is plenty of time for us to act so our children are protected. I have an uncomfortable prediction about the next mass murder. The next attack will be at a place that politicians told us was safe because law-abiding people like us were disarmed. It is time we looked harder.
Gun control is the promise that ink on paper will protect our children. That isn’t a new idea. We’ve had gun control laws for over a century. Today, we have over twenty thousand firearms regulations, and we were told that each and every one of them was the essential step that would finally make us safe.
We’re told that honest civilians should be disarmed, but the first thing we do at the sign of danger is called someone with a gun.
We were told that mandatory background checks would keep crazy people from getting firearms. That claim assumes that the government is always doing its job. The government might disarm a million honest citizens who are no threat to anyone, but that doesn’t stop the damage done from allowing a single criminal to get a gun. We know what happens next.
We saw background checks fail when a crazy man attacked college students in a gun-free zone in Isla Vista, California. Background checks failed when a crazy man attacked a prayer meeting in a gun-free zone at the African Methodist Episcopal Church in Charleston, South Carolina. Background checks failed when the murderer passed his background check despite being a prohibited individual and attacked the First Baptist Church in Sutherland Springs, Texas. Those are the clear examples where we knew the murderer was crazy or criminal before he attacked, and he passed his background check anyway.
The murderer at Parkland, Florida got a gun despite people contacting the FBI and saying the former student wanted to commit mass murder. Most of us recognize that as a significant clue.
If gun control depends on perfection, then it is doomed to fail.
We can cite example after example where the murderer got his firearm without bothering with a background check. The murderer at Sandy Hook Elementary School murdered his mother to take her guns. The murderer at Red Lake, Minnesota murdered his grandfather, a tribal deputy, to take his firearms. The political leftists who tried to kill dozens of Republican legislators at a baseball field in Alexandria, Virginia was a prohibited person who took his guns illegally from his father.
It now takes over a year to get a carry permit in Detroit while criminals get a gun in minutes on the street corner. How will disarming more honest citizens make us safer?
Mass murder shocks us. In contrast, the news media barely reports the hundreds of people who are shot in our failed cities every week. If we’re going to talk about saving lives, then we have to look at the ordinary citizens who are the victims of violent crime every day.
Some politicians said we would be safer if law-abiding good guys were disarmed. Is anyone surprised that their gun control laws left guns in the hands of criminals who break the law for a living? Drug gangs easily smuggle a few ounces of steel, brass, and lead as they smuggle millions of people across the border, and smuggle thousands of tons of drugs each year. Are you surprised that prohibition doesn’t work? Gun prohibition only disarms the law-abiding, and that hasn’t made our cities safer.
I want to clear up a possible misunderstanding. I’m convinced that gun control leaves us at risk. I know you might feel differently and I beg you to hear me out. I think gun control laws put our children in danger, but that isn’t because I’m different than you are; it is because I’ve seen things you might not have seen. I’ve looked into the eyes of the police officer who ran toward the sound of gunfire to save kids. That officer arrived too late. I’ve listened to a victim who was shot by a mass murderer and survived. They both begged us to keep the kids safe until the police arrived. That is exactly what the investigators said after the attack in Parkland, Florida.
It is time we listened.. before it is too late.
‘I looked at the video, and we could have stopped him if someone inside the school had a gun.’
About Rob Morse
The original article is posted here. Rob Morse writes about gun rights at Ammoland, at Clash Daily, and on his SlowFacts blog. He hosts the Self Defense Gun Stories Podcast and co-hosts the Polite Society Podcast. Rob was an NRA pistol instructor and combat handgun competitor.
Rob Morse states the obvious, at least to gun owners who understand that inanimate objects are not the issue. It does appear that the government has convinced brainwashed a large portion of the population having them believe that fearing guns is healthy and gun owners are enemies of the state. These socialists – I’m married to one so I’ve got first hand experience – comment and reiterate and ‘follow’ and ‘re-tweet’, or whatever they call it, anything that feels like or sounds like something bad happened with a gun. It doesn’t matter that more people die in automobile accidents –… Read more »
Ghettos in large Democrat urban centers experience equal to this count each weekend and 100″ X worse nationwide annually. However it is easier and more profitable for Democrats to blame firearm homicides on white,law abiding conservatives that obey the laws . Most carnage is from stolen firearms and committed by habitual felons of known ethnicity. But why let facts ever get in the way of emotions of democrats.
In reference to the last of the first paragraph I guess I am not always a, “law abiding” person. I can live with that.
Secondly the school jobs are where a lot of officers go to retire. And some of them are cowards. As was the case in this instance.
There was a Deputy Sheriff on the school grounds with a gun. But, he had “no duty” to protect any one or any group of students or teachers / administrators – Only “society”. … That is he was there for “show” / a “political prop”. I am glad you wrote the above essay. … However, I would offer additionally “our common culture” is non existent. “Government” has become a religion to too many – alleviating “the believers” of any personal responsibility for themselves: there is always some else who is at fault, and evil does not exist except in inanimate… Read more »
The reason the powers that be want us the law abiding citizen disarmed is because, when the SHTF the criminals will not be the ones that fight for freedom. They will do what criminals always do, sit back, and wait for the most opertune time to do their evil deeds. Which is to rob, kill, rape, and take advantage of the defenseless. History tells us this is true!
@mm44m – As I heard it, New Zealand shooter actually was a white supremacist. He figured his rampage in NZ would trigger gun control laws in the US – leading to revolt by American white supremacists – who would of course win. Thus he was attempting to bring on a new world order by manipulating us.
Silly ditze that he was, he didn’t realize that gun rights are human rights. Any pushback will be by freedom lovers regardless of race or creed. Only racism involved is coming from Democrats pushing for it to divide us.
“I predict future happiness for Americans, if they can prevent the government from wasting the labors of the people under the pretense of taking care of them.”
THOMAS JEFFERSON
that image heading this piece has always bothered me. What if they had NOT fully cleared and verified the area? What if the guy who took this photograph had instead been a BGWG? Note thetwo officers.. they are watching the kids. The kids are safe and obedient, if not confused and maybe scared. THEY DO NOT NEED WATCHING. Where are the eyes everywhere else, searching for signs of another or a new threat? But the “leaders” are watching the kids for compliance as they dutifully march onward……. And the kids are indanger purely because of the “hands on shoulders of… Read more »
I didn’t see it in any of the other comments but IIRC the first two victims at Isla Vista were murdered with edged weapons – yet the only outcry by the lame stream media is over the ones murdered with a gun.Nah, not a bit of selective outrage or bias, move along, nothing to see here.
Solution = become a criminal.