ATF Issues Conflicting Responses About Warrantless Firearm Inspection

ATF Agents IMG ATFHQ-IG Public Domain
ATF Agents IMG ATFHQ-IG Public Domain

U.S.A.-(AmmoLand.com)- ATF’s severely underworked public information officers are flustered. A story we first published Monday about a surprise firearm inspection at a Delaware man’s home has gone viral, exposing their agents’ misdeeds and questionable tactics.

Now, ATF’s PIOs are answering questions from the national media and an irate Montana Congressman. Before, the PIOs didn’t even answer their phones.

The story chronicled the plight of a law-abiding Delaware man, who asked that his name not be published. Two ATF agents and a Delaware State Police trooper showed up on his front porch – unannounced – wearing tactical vests, t-shirts and dirty jeans. They pleaded with the homeowner to show them several of his firearms. One of the agents told the man they were investigating whether he had committed a “straw purchase,” since he had bought seven firearms since January. If they could just see his guns, they said, they would leave immediately and not have to return. They did not have a search warrant.

The homeowner’s security system captured a video of the encounter:

To be clear, no one from ATF commented for the story prior to publication – neither the Resident Agent in Charge of ATF’s Wilmington, Delaware field office, nor Amanda Hils, PIO for ATF’s Baltimore Field Division or anyone at ATF’s headquarters in Washington D.C.

Things changed on Tuesday after the story was published. Hils issued a quick statement:

On 2022-07-19 12:32, Hils, Amanda M. wrote:

Good afternoon, Lee — Thank you for reaching out and I appreciate your patience with my reply. ATF does not release the process in which it conducts investigations.

I hope you have a great day.

V/R

Amanda M. Hils

Public Information Officer

ATF Baltimore Field Division

Both the Washington Times and the Daily Caller began asking ATF questions about the incident. The ATF sent them similar statements:

“The ATF defended itself in a statement to The Washington Times, saying the agents’ actions were ‘entirely appropriate.’ ‘We are unable to comment on the details of any ongoing investigations; however, interviews are an entirely appropriate part of the investigative process for any law enforcement agency,” the Washington Times reported.

According to the Daily Caller:

“A spokesperson for the ATF said they ‘are unable to comment on the details of any ongoing investigations; however, interviews are an entirely appropriate part of the investigative process for any law enforcement agency.’”

Wednesday night, Mils sent another statement describing the process ATF uses to conduct investigations, which she had previously said was secret:

The Delaware State Police partners with the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives (ATF) via a task force model to help combat gun violence in our state by investigating potential illegal gun purchases made by individuals on behalf of others who are prohibited from purchasing or possessing firearms, also known as straw purchases. At times, this leads to interviews conducted by task force officers, which are non-custodial, voluntary interviews done in full compliance will all applicable local, state, and federal laws. ATF and DSP remain committed in our mission to reduce violent crime and help make communities safer.

V/R

Amanda M. Hils

Public Information Officer

ATF Baltimore Field Division

Possible Congressional inquiry

The story caught the attention of at least one Congressman. According to the Washington Times, Montana Republican Rep. Matt Rosendale was not pleased, and he wants answers:

“The ATF must answer questions on why they decided to conduct an illegal search, especially since the homeowner had done nothing wrong. These actions by the federal government are unsettling, and they have no business going door-to-door to see who owns firearms. I fear that there will be more illegal inspections to come as the Left continues its assault on our 2nd Amendment rights. Congress should investigate this immediately.”

When he learned about the possible congressional inquiry, the anonymous homeowner said only, “Hell yes!”

Takeaways

ATF’s claim that these task force interviews are “voluntary” is laughable. Most folks are not attorneys, so when three armed men wearing tactical vests show up on their front porch unannounced, they don’t realize they can tell them to leave and slam the door.

ATF is using the public’s legal naiveté to their advantage. In fact, they’re counting on it. This is not law enforcement. It’s intimidation. The Delaware homeowner had done nothing wrong. He had the financial means to purchase a few firearms, which is a constitutional right guaranteed in the Second Amendment, so he bought a couple of guns. This is not a crime – at least not yet.

The fact that ATF declined to comment about the Delaware encounter because it was an “ongoing investigation” is ludicrous. What federal crime did the homeowner commit? Is there a Grand Jury investigating his lawful firearm purchases? Does he need a lawyer? If the agents had actual probable cause he committed a crime, they would have brought a search warrant rather than a page from an illegal gun registry.

It should come as no surprise that this encounter came just a few days after ATF’s new director, Steve Dettelbach, was sworn in. Dettelbach is notoriously anti-gun. When he ran unsuccessfully for Ohio Attorney General in 2018, he was endorsed by Barack Obama, Joe Biden and Everytown for Gun Safety. During his campaign for AG, Dettelbach called for reinstating the failed federal “assault weapon” ban and for universal background checks.

These warrantless home intrusions make it crystal clear where the new director is taking the agency. Under Dettelbach, the ATF is ready, willing and able to serve on the front lines of Joe Biden’s war on our guns.

Expect the worst and make ready.

This story is presented by the Second Amendment Foundation’s Investigative Journalism Project and wouldn’t be possible without you. Please click here to make a tax-deductible donation to support more pro-gun stories like this.


About Lee Williams

Lee Williams, who is also known as “The Gun Writer,” is the chief editor of the Second Amendment Foundation’s Investigative Journalism Project. Until recently, he was also an editor for a daily newspaper in Florida. Before becoming an editor, Lee was an investigative reporter at newspapers in three states and a U.S. Territory. Before becoming a journalist, he worked as a police officer. Before becoming a cop, Lee served in the Army. He’s earned more than a dozen national journalism awards as a reporter, and three medals of valor as a cop. Lee is an avid tactical shooter.

Lee Williams

 

 

172 Comments
Most Voted
Newest Oldest
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Paul1911ACP

Is it just me that notices when the overlords start a crime control program they go after the law abiding citizen, not the criminals in the cities? Notice they call it GUN CONTROL and never CRIME CONTROL. It is easier to make political hay going after low hanging fruit (Lawful citizens that will comply) than criminals that will shoot them. And it looks good to the anti-gunners!

GomeznSA

Hmm, had a thought after moving to another story so had to return. When the (supposed) bat said up front that the home owner hadn’t done anything wrong, the very next question should have been: ‘then why are you here?’ – followed by ‘who sent you?’ and then ‘how did you get your information?’.
That should have been the end of the encounter but unfortunately most of us don’t think fast enough to do so on the spur of the moment. That I didn’t think of this immediately shows that we aren’t always as quick as we should be.

nrringlee

ATF is very sorry. Very sorry indeed. Very sorry they got caught and outed.

Montana454Casull

The cowards all ran and hid when unarmed citizens took the capital by force on January 6th . What the hell will these spineless basturds do when pissed off Americans show up armed and ready for battle ?

gregs

do you think they will release any information about this incident after the “ongoing investigation” is completed, or will it be forgotten?

ALWAYS record interactions with government agents. it is your RIGHT.
NEVER talk with a government agent without an attorney present.
DO NOT let government agents in your house/home or onto your property, it they are TELL THEM TO LEAVE.
even if government agents have a search warrant you DO NOT have to talk to them.
Government agents are NOT your friend.

lynnard

the need for the 2nd amendment is more important every day.

Beowulf

Perhaps these agents should quit harassing law abiding gun owners and knock on Obama and Holder’s doors if their looking for gun runners.

Bill

Remember Ruby Ridge and Waco and a couple of other incidents. The results when a private citizens requires the BATFE to produce a search warrant usually end in disaster (for the citizen).

Ed

Get off my porch, get off my property and don’t come back…

Carbuilder

My question is, how did they have the serial numbers of the firearms purchased. It’s illegal for the federal government to keep a firearms owner/serial number database. When a multiple sales report is issued to the CLO it does NOT have any serial numbers attached to it.

So how did they illegally have the serial numbers of this guy’s firearms?