A Federal District Judge has declared the law unconstitutional, and yet the government’s knee-jerk reaction is to continue enforcing it against as many Americans as possible. Decades of settled case law says that it’s wrong.
A federal District Judge ruled the government ban on the possession and carry of firearms in Post Offices violates the rights protected by the Second Amendment.
The recent federal court rulings striking down the post office gun ban are not just legal footnotes; they are personal. They cut to the core of what it means to be an American who refuses to surrender his rights.
Bans on the possession of firearms in federal government buildings are a recent innovation in the history of the United States of America.
We believe the ruling should be affirmed. The government has provided no evidence of a historical tradition of disarming federal employees, same as it has shown no tradition of prohibiting firearms from postal facilities.
A federal lawsuit challenging the ban on firearms carry in U.S. Post Office facilities has been filed by the Second Amendment Foundation in U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Texas, Fort Worth Division.
A new Federal lawsuit in Texas challenging the ban on firearms carry in U.S. Post Offices and on postal property as violations of the Second Amendment…
The challenge to the ban on rights protected by the Second Amendment on Post Office property is being appealed to the Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals.