Today is Monday, September 01, 2014rss RSS feed
microstamping

microstamping

Second Amendment Foundation

Second Amendment Foundation

BELLEVUE, WA --(Ammoland.com)- Responding to the court’s request for additional information in the Second Amendment Foundation’s long-running case of Pena v. Lindley, a lawsuit challenging the state handgun roster requirements that include microstamping and magazine disconnects, a supplemental brief filed yesterday by attorney Alan Gura that included an additional declaration by Lawrence G. Keane, secretary and general counsel to the Sporting Arms and Ammunition Manufacturers’ Institute (SAAMI).

Keane is also senior vice president and general counsel to the National Shooting Sports Foundation (NSSF).

In his statement, Keane told the court that, “To date, I am not aware of a single handgun manufacturer worldwide that has produce a functioning, commercially available semiautomatic pistol designed and equipped with ‘a microscopic array of characters that identify the make, model, and serial number of the pistol’ etched or otherwise imprinted in two or more places on the interior surface or internal working parts of the pistol…”

“It is important for the court to understand that the microstamping requirements now included in California’s law simply cannot be met,” said SAF founder and Executive Vice President Alan M. Gottlieb. “We are delighted and grateful that a reliable and knowledgeable representative for SAAMI and NSSF has weighed in.”

Keane’s detailed brief reinforces earlier documents submitted by Glock, Smith & Wesson and Sturm, Ruger.

“Our challenge to California’s statute now includes important support information from recognized experts,” Gottlieb observed. “Clearly, our arguments are backed up by facts and technical information that shows the state’s requirements are not simply unreasonable, but cannot possibly be met any time in the foreseeable future. In short, California has passed a law for which compliance is impossible.”

The case was originally filed in 2009 as a challenge to California’s regulation that arbitrarily bans handguns based on a roster of “acceptable” handgun models approved by the state. The revised case addresses microstamping, which has made it even harder to legally purchase a handgun in the Golden State.

The Second Amendment Foundation (www.saf.org) is the nation’s oldest and largest tax-exempt education, research, publishing and legal action group focusing on the Constitutional right and heritage to privately own and possess firearms. Founded in 1974, The Foundation has grown to more than 650,000 members and supporters and conducts many programs designed to better inform the public about the consequences of gun control.
  • One User comment to “Supplemental Briefs Filed In SAF’s California PENA Case ( Microstamping )”

    1. Californian approved pistol- made by Super-Soaker.

    Leave a Comment

    • Sign up Ammoland for your Inbox

      Daily Digest

      Monthly Newsletter

    • Recent Comments

      • Cliff: Looks like yet another “liberal progressive” trying hard to be a dictator. Kind of sounds like the...
      • Javert: Two SCOTUS decisions prohibit crime victims from suing law enforcement. Secondly, he was elected and will...
      • dato karazanishvili: hello. Im contacting you from Republic of Georgia. we have body armor development and we are...
      • TEX: @Big Boy,I think forged !
      • Chris Rasmus: It has nothing to do with the fact that you can’t double stack rimfire ammo?
    • Social Activity

    • Most Popular Posts

    • AmmoLand Poll

    Copyright 2014 AmmoLand.com Shooting Sports News | Sitemap | Μολὼν λαβέ
    13575488
    14182688