This new California law is designed to suppress any defense of the Second Amendment in court by imposing standards that violate the First Amendment. We will not let this stand.
The California Legislature & Gov. Gavin Newsom may think they can ride roughshod over the Constitution,but they really can’t, & we’re hoping the court quickly erases any doubt.
The lawsuit challenges California’s recently passed law banning the sale of tools & CNC machines made exclusively to finish firearms frames or receivers.
Make no mistake: this is NOT the end of the anti-gun war – especially here in California. We know full well that the Left will come back at us in January, angrier than ever
One might expect this censorship in Putin’s Russia, but it is in Biden’s America. When fanatics take their fight to this level, it’s an attack on Americans.
Californians have been held hostage under the state’s arbitrary determination of what is a “safe handgun” while the rest of America enjoys modern guns.
Conditioning a carry license on a discretionary …‘good moral character’ is patently inconsistent with Bruen’s …..carry right may not be denied by non-objective criteria applied by a local governme
The Supreme Court’s decision in Bruen eliminates any plausible argument for a stay in this case… The people of California have endured for long enough.
If the California AG is to be believed, then the system architects are grossly incompetent or massively unqualified to design the system, or did so on purpose?
CA Attorney General Rob Bonta’s move was clearly retaliation against law-abiding gun owners for the Supreme Court’s decision reaffirming your 2nd amendment rights.
California Attorney General says “effective immediately, issuing authorities should no longer require proof of good cause for the issuance of a public-carry license.”
According to his plea agreement, O’Reilly, had been adjudicated as mentally defective, preventing him from legally possessing firearms. However….
When a three-judge panel struck down California’s law prohibiting sales of semiautomatic rifles to young adults, it underscored the importance of who occupies the oval office.
According to an update from Sacramento police, “Evidence in the case indicates that at least five shooters fired guns during the shooting…”
But according to CNN, the single firearm recovered at the scene was a stolen handgun. There would have been no background check for that pistol.
The message here: the laws are still not enough. Every state will have to follow suit. And they still won’t be enough.
To be clear, he, and they, support Chinese communist citizen disarmament edicts and want to impose them here.
The Los Angeles Times keeps shoveling their anti-gun propaganda, but no one is listening. The readers are too busy trying to buy guns.
“This is clearly an attempt violate the law, and the constitutional privacy rights of California gun owners…” — Alan Gottlieb, Second Amendment Foundation
The Second Amendment has applied to the states via the 14th Amendment ever since the June 2010 Supreme Court ruling in McDonald v. City of Chicago, a case brought by SAF and ISRA.