Congress Votes 98 to 1 Against His Plan. Media buries the story.
PHOENIX, AZ –-(Ammoland.com)- The Historic bipartisan vote was and is unprecedented.
The lamestream media told you:
“The Senate voted 98-1 to approve bipartisan legislation that would require president Obama to let Congress review, and possibly reject, any final nuclear deal with Iran. The bill still must be approved by the House, where Speaker John Boehner, R-Ohio, said he will urge its passage.” USA Today
The Uninvited Ombudsman notes however that:
In a one-inch blurb buried at the page bottom under “Briefs,” and then last, under “Also,” USA Today, an outspoken promoter of the person currently in the White House, embarrassingly buried a disastrous defeat in Mr. Obama’s radical effort to provide radical Iran with nuclear-weapon capabilities.
By a virtually unheard of vote of 98 to 1 against Obama’s major foreign-policy initiative, Congress voted against his plan to create a nuclear scheme for the world’s most rogue islamist nation that would expire completely in a number years, and during its existence would do little to prevent the sharia-based warlike jihadi muslim dictatorship gear up for atom-bomb production.
As USA Today describes it, Congress will be able to see only the “final” deal, and “possibly” reject it, as if the near unanimous vote doesn’t signal the outrage within Congress over Mr. Obama’s efforts — which have been obvious so far. As a last-gasp effort to suggest Obama may somehow squeak through without a need for Congress, the one incher points out that John Boehner, Speaker of the House, would still have to move the bill. Boehner and Obama are arch rivals.
Iran has already publicly stated it has no duty to obey the terms of the deal, and it wants sanctions against it lifted immediately upon signing.
The mainly financial sanctions are hurting it badly and are the only reason it is negotiating at all, if you can call it that, and all deals with it in the past have been grossly violated without compunction. It refuses to repeal its adamant call to murder all Jews and wipe Israel off the map, it remains the largest state-funding source for the global jihad, the jihad it sponsors calls for the extermination, enslavement or conversion of the entire world population to islam, and Hussein-Obama has already agreed, through his rep John Kerry, to let the entire deal expire in a decade and a half anyway, making it basically a go ahead for Iran to build atom bombs.
Why would an American president do that, Congress asks itself, then votes 98 to 1, in unheard of unison effort, against letting him do so.
USA Today decides this news should be buried. The biggest story on page one for the day, including a large color photo and double-spaced type, announced that David Cameron might win as Prime Minister of Great Britain, but they don’t know yet. Was that bigger news? (He eventually won.)
About GunLaws.com:
Scottsdale, Ariz.-based Bloomfield Press, founded in 1988, is the largest publisher and distributor of gun-law books in the country. Our website, gunlaws.com, features a free national directory to gun laws and relevant contacts in all states and federally, along with our unique line of related books and DVDs. “After Your Shoot” for media review is available on request, call 800-707-4020. Our authors are available for interview, call to schedule. Call for cogent positions on gun issues, informed analysis on proposed laws, talk radio that lights up the switchboard, fact sheets and position papers. As we always say, “It doesn’t make sense to own a gun and not know the rules.” Visit: www.gunlaws.com
Why would an American president do that?
The answer: A sworn pact of Solidarity between the Communist SDS (1960’s”New Left”) and the Radical Islamic Jihad terrorists. His communist and Jihadist mentors imbedded this alliance deep into his basic beliefs.
When you become aware of this solid Solidarity Alliance the goals of his policies become obvious.
My source personally transported representatives of the Communist SDS and Middle Eastern Jihadists to conferences and meetings in the performance of his duties.