Should School Teachers Be Armed? The Uft Doesn’t Think So

CO-FOUNDER OF ARBALEST GROUP, LLC., RESPONDS TO UFT OPINION PIECE CONCERNING THE ARMING OF NEW YORK'S SCHOOL TEACHERS

Guns Teachers Schools
Should School Teachers Be Armed?
Arbalest Quarrel
Arbalest Quarrel

New York, NY -(AmmoLand.com)- The “United Federation of Teachers (UFT”), a New York City affiliate of the American Federation of Teachers, posted an article in its publication, Teacher, titled, Gun Fight.

The article appeared in the May 5, 2016 edition of Teacher. The link to the article may be accessed here: http://www.uft.org/editorials/gun-fight. The editorial takes aim at the notion that arming teachers to protect students is a bad idea.

Stephen L. D’Andrilli, one of three founders of the weblog, the Arbalest Quarrel, was a licensed New York teacher and receives the UFT publication, Teacher.

After reading the UFT Op-Ed, Stephen felt a need to respond and did so. Stephen’s response to the Op-Ed was published in the June 2, 2016 edition of Teacher, under the Editor's title, “Editorial shoots blanks.”

Stephen's response to the UFT editorial appears, in full, below:

“I am responding to your recent editorial (‘Gunfight'). The question posed is whether allowing educators to bring firearms to K-12 schools in New York would protect students against gun violence. The editorial considers the question from the standpoint of the 2012 Sandy Hook Elementary School tragedy.

In arguing that arming educators is a bad idea, a few hypothetical situations involving armed educators are presented; outcomes are postulated; and a tacit conclusion is drawn: educators should not be allowed to bring firearms to school.

The scenarios are typical straw man arguments. Nothing substantive can be deduced from them. One may argue just as readily that an armed educator would likely successfully protect the lives of his or her students from an armed aggressor. The editorial’s hypotheticals amount to straw man arguments. Straw man arguments obfuscate. They do not elucidate. Any possibility follows from a false antecedent in a counterfactual.

The editorial concludes by discussing another matter entirely: the need to provide adequate mental health care for deeply disturbed individuals is no more than a stopgap. The point does not address deeply disturbed individuals who slip through the cracks; nor does it address the issue of criminals and terrorists that threaten soft targets like schools.

So, if the invasion of schools by armed lunatics, terrorists, or assorted criminals cannot be contained and, through time, becomes pervasive and, if educators are not armed, what is the alternative? There is one we can think of: an armed contingent of police officers, peace officers, or private armed security to protect students, faculty, and administrators in schools. That will work, but, what will it cost? One armed guard, as the editorial staff of New York Teacher admits, will, arguably, never be enough.”

STEPHEN D'ANDRILLI'S BIO:

Stephen was President and CEO of two security consulting and criminological research firms. He was also a business partner in a New York City licensed indoor gun range. Stephen is a decorated veteran police officer of the New York City Police Department. While employed with the N.Y.P.D., Stephen earned three University degrees from John Jay College of Criminal Justice. Stephen earned a Bachelor of Science degree in Police Science, a Master of Arts degree in Criminal Justice Administration and a Master in Public Administration degree.

Later, Stephen served as an Adjunct Professor/Lecturer of Police Science at John Jay College of Criminal Justice. Stephen then served as a high school Social Studies Teacher for the New York City Department of Education and served as Dean and Athletic Coach for the Department. He is an expert in personal and corporate security.

Stephen is a National Rifle Association Certified Firearms Instructor (pistol, rifle and shotgun) and Training Counselor, and is an active member of the International Association of Law Enforcement Firearms Instructors. He has testified on firearms, crime, and self-defense before governmental committees and at governmental hearings, on many occasions.

Stephen has written many articles on these subjects and has appeared on television and radio. Major national and international newspapers, magazines and professional journals have profiled Stephen. Stephen is passionate about the Constitution and passionate about the Bill of Rights, the cornerstone of the Republic. Stephen is aware the Bill of Rights is under attack. Stephen understands that Americans must defend the Bill of Rights if they are to protect and preserve their heritage.

About The Arbalest Quarrel:

Arbalest Group created `The Arbalest Quarrel’ website for a special purpose. That purpose is to educate the American public about recent Federal and State firearms control legislation. No other website, to our knowledge, provides as deep an analysis or as thorough an analysis. Arbalest Group offers this information free.

For more information, visit: www.arbalestquarrel.com.

  • 4 thoughts on “Should School Teachers Be Armed? The Uft Doesn’t Think So

    1. All mass shootings are stopped by a good guy with a gun. Every rampage / active shooter situation ends when the good guys with guns arrive. Every. Single. One. The good guys either shoot the maniac or the maniac shoots himself or the maniac gives up. If a good guy with a gun

      doesn’t show up? The maniac continues to kill at his leisure.

      Truly, it isn’t that hard to understand, is it?

      I always come back to the children who have died needlessly, virtually killed by those who refuse to do everything in their power to keep them safe, murdered by those who ignore the facts of gun free zones due to their twisted, hoplophobic fear of an inanimate object, executed by those who feel morally superior when children are slaughtered by a maniac with a gun, rather than protected by a good guy with a gun.

      For me it is beyond the scope of comprehension.

      I remember thinking, when the news reports filtered down from Sandy Hook…
      What would have happened that fateful day if Principle Dawn Hochsprung had run down that terror filled hallway towards a crazed gunman with something more than a fearless soul and a heart as big as all outdoors?

    2. Wouldn’t it be more accurate to say that the Jackasses who are running the AFT don’t want teachers to be armed. The Leftist Liberal Progressives, who may be being influenced by Bloomberg, Soros, and Obama don’t want teachers to be armed?
      I’m quire sure that if you could pole the body of teachers you would get a mixed bag of answers.

      1. Love the way they always hang a cowboy action 6 shooter and fast draw rig on these pics when doing their best to make the story a negative in the minds of the reader.
        The school resource officers are armed and no one ever complains about them. BUT, let one of them retire from his or her position as a sworn officer and become a teacher the following Monday and you can bet they would be burned to stake if they came armed as a teacher…..WHY? I worked as a LEO for 25 year and the day I retired I immediately became a criminal if I carried on a school campus. WHY?
        I was a Marine for 9 year before becoming a police officer and for a total of 34 years of my life I worked with or carried a weapon on duty. BUT let me retire and or become a teacher and by golly I am a complete crazy for having a firearm in possession when on a school campus. Am I a danger, NO, am I a need on the campus, I suppose that depends on who you talk to. I look at it this way, our department had a 4.30 sec response time to priority one calls (the hot ones) and if that is true today and I am one of only 2 on campus with a weapon when an active shooter go berserk at the school well guess what. If the two of us, the officer assigned to the school or my self are not near the shooter at his or her beginning of fire we have to find them and do our best to stop the firing of a weapon and hurting or killing students and staff before any called officers arrive outside and try themselves to locate the shooter. If you look at the arrival times for most active shooter calls they are more than 4 minutes and most shooters are done with and have killed themselves in five, so, Should a teacher who is trained and carried discreetly be allowed to carry on campus or should we just wait and hope the single officer on campus if he/she is there that day can find and stop the shooter before they carry out the madness we know they are capable of

    3. I think the editorial staff of that rag, and that administrative staff of the parent organization should be disbursed to NY schools to be the first line of defense for the students armed only with “gun free zone” signs. Then their next of kin can report on how well their plan worked.

    Comments are closed.