Donald Trump’s NYC Handgun Carry Application Revealed

Donald Trump's NYC Handgun Application
Donald Trump's NYC Handgun Carry Application
Arbalest Quarrel
Arbalest Quarrel

New York, NY  -(Ammoland.com)-  A recent freedom of information request to the NYC license division released this copy of the President elect's NYC Handgun Carry Application.

As you can see, the reproduction is very poor. Moreover, the document is Trump’s handgun renewal application. It isn’t a copy of the actual unrestricted carry application.

At most it simply shows that Trump does have or did have a handgun license issued by the license division of New York City.

Regardless it is very reassuring to see that the future President of the United States believes in the freedom to carry concealed.

About The Arbalest Quarrel:

Arbalest Group created `The Arbalest Quarrel' website for a special purpose. That purpose is to educate the American public about recent Federal and State firearms control legislation. No other website, to our knowledge, provides as deep an analysis or as thorough an analysis. Arbalest Group offers this information free.

For more information, visit: www.arbalestquarrel.com.

Subscribe
Notify of
14 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
herb
herb
3 years ago

Should have a free carry country wide my state is free carry and I do not want to get a permit that I do not need now!

spartacus
spartacus
3 years ago

All politicians carry guns.

Trump is a businessman who at least filed his

permit, and paid for the license, unlike most of those

POLITICIANS, who when caught with a gun, and no concealed carry

license, would lawyer up, and start blathering endlessly about THEIR

Second Amendment rights, which they so blithely deny US.

Jim Macklin
Jim Macklin
3 years ago

Tim Sullivan wrote the first NY gun law, known as the Sullivan Act. It was intended to assist crime since Tim was a leader of the Irish Five Points Gang. He wrote the law so he could disarm victims and primarily disarm rival gangs. He could issue a permit or deny a permit.

Not much has changed except the fraud that this was crime control and states and cities all over tried to copy the NY law as crime control.

Captain Carl
Captain Carl
3 years ago

There shouldn’t be any permits! The right to keep and bare arms IS A RIGHT! NOT a privilege.

Joe
Joe
3 years ago

It has long been known that anybody with enough money could get a permit to carry in NYC: and judges, and lawyers, and people who carry tons of cash regularly. But you try and get one.

Pistol Pete
Pistol Pete
3 years ago

There should be a national right to carry permit, the 2nd Amendment gives people the right to carry a gun, it does not give the states or the federal government the right to limit when and where people carry there guns. One permit should cover all 50 States.

wood and steel
wood and steel
3 years ago
Reply to  Pistol Pete

We should have constitutional carry through out U.S. no permit required. The 2A says nothing about permits it says “shall not be infringed” permits of anykind are infringement by definition

Just my $0.02

CoosaTotahK9
CoosaTotahK9
3 years ago
Reply to  Pistol Pete

“…the 2nd Amendment gives people the right to carry a gun,…”?????? This mentality is why we are in such deep doo-doo! The Second Amendment, The Bill of Rights, The Constitution of the U.S. DOES NOT give or grant Rights! The government, the socialists, the progressives, and other anti-free-will dictator what-a-bees have done a good job at brainwashing the general population into a position of submitting your Rights to the control of “Other Men”, “Elitists”! When you do this your liberties are no more, your Rights are no more. You are a slave to the will and wishes of other men,… Read more »

Vanns40
Vanns40
3 years ago
Reply to  CoosaTotahK9

Well, you almost qualified for writing a tome. That said, you are correct on all points (although I admit to speed reading through a good deal). The Constitution merely reaffirms existing rights that predate ALL forms of govt. Given that, let’s bend just a tiny bit and agree that National Reciprocity would simply be the Fed. govt reaffirming our preexisting right to carry in all States and denying those recalcitrant States the unlawful power they have seized in denying us that right! Now, when you look at it from that viewpoint and also understand that the Federal Govt. would have… Read more »

Richard
Richard
3 years ago
Reply to  Pistol Pete

The Second Amendment does NOT “Give” people the Right to keep and bear Arms, we are Born with that Right… The Constitution Enshrines and Enumerates these God-Given Rights… Government’s ONLY legal Duty, is to Protect and Defend these Rights…

Eric_CA
Eric_CA
3 years ago
Reply to  Pistol Pete

I agree. In my opinion, all the State laws violate the 2nd and 10th Amendment.

DaProf
DaProf
3 years ago

I imagine, since he spends time in Florida, he has more than one permit. Especially with such a

After all, Florida is the Gunshine State!

hippybiker
hippybiker
3 years ago
Reply to  DaProf

Florida the “gun shine state?” This year in Florida, with a large tourist population we have had less murders in the whole state then one lousy city in Illinois with less population and stricter gun laws. Your comment is disingenuous to say the least.

Scott Fortney
Scott Fortney
3 years ago
Reply to  hippybiker

I think he meant Gunshine as a compliment. That’s great that Florida has less crime and it’s probably because the bad guys know their potential victims could be armed.