America First? Not If The Democrats & Never Trump Republicans Have Their Way

By Roger J. Katz, Attorney at Law and Stephen L. D’Andrilli
How To Destroy A U.S. President.
Part Two

The Senate Axis of evil: Sen. Chuck Schumer, D-N.Y., center, flanked by Sen. John McCain, R-Ariz., left, and Sen. Lindsey Graham, R-S.C.
The Senate Axis of evil: Sen. Chuck Schumer, D-N.Y., center, flanked by Sen. John McCain, R-Ariz., left, and Sen. Lindsey Graham, R-S.C. (AP Photo/J. Scott Applewhite)
Arbalest Quarrel
Arbalest Quarrel

New York, NY  -( It should go without saying, but we will say it anyway because few other voices are saying it: This Country needs Donald Trump!

A substantial number of Americans understands this and agrees with this assertion.

Those who do not are prone to smug self-complacency, or to mournful resignation, or to emotional hand-wringing, or have simply given to parroting the nonsense spouted through the mainstream media believing that the nonsense emanates from their conscience when it is but an external virus thrust deep into the subconscious mind through insidious unrelenting psychological programming, where it remains to do its harm.

Our Country has lost its way. For far too long our Nation has been backsliding into defeatist statism. With Trump’s ascendancy, we have the means to return to our traditions, our heritage, our values, our sense of purpose, our pride in Nation, in family, in self. But, Congressional Democrats and Congressional Centrist Republicans don’t want this. The two groups share the same basic political goals and objectives. Those goals and objectives are contrary to the well-being of our Nation and its citizenry. Our President, Donald Trump, has charted a new course for our Country, one in line with the founders’ beliefs and ideals, one that asks the question, what is in our best interests of our Country rather than what is the best interests of other Countries. But, the naysayers—the Congressional Democrats and Centrist Republicans—will have none of it.

The Aims And Objectives Of Congressional Democrats And Centrist Republicans

One: Congressional Democrats and Congressional Centrist Republicans machinate continuously for an expansion of neoliberal globalist economic policies. This operates to the detriment of American labor and small business although beneficial to the multinationals, whose allegiance to any Nation State is nominal at best.

Two: Congressional Democrats and Congressional Centrist Republicans support the relaxation of our immigration laws. In so doing, they would effectively destroy the geographical integrity of our Nation. This reflects a conscious desire to mirror the aims of EU leaders, who seek, subtly, to erode the independence and sovereignty of individual European Nation States through uniform economic, political, and social governance, assisted through the slow dissolution of an individual Nation State’s national identity.

Concomitant with the relaxing of our Nation’s laws on naturalization, the two political groups, comprising the Congressional Democrats and Congressional Centrist Republicans, would give amnesty to millions of illegal immigrants, dismissing concern over the fact that at least hundred thousand of them belong to criminal gangs and drug cartels or are otherwise common criminals. A policy of amnesty for those residents in our Country, who are here illegally and are not, then, of our Country, would do nothing to curtail further influxes of illegal aliens entering our Country. To the contrary, granting amnesty to those persons who reside in our Country illegally would simply encourage millions more to enter this Country illegally, encouraging, also, the disassembling of our Nation’s history, its traditions, mores, and values, all of which would be replaced with a program reflecting new ideas and ideals–ideas and ideals at odds with our Country’s ideals and traditions. These new ideas and ideals include: multiculturalism, bilingualism or multilingualism, historical revisionism, ethical relativism, and obscuration and ambiguation of our sacred rights and liberties.

Three: Congressional Democrats and Congressional Centrist Republicans would carelessly invite into our Country—with the connivance of friendly federal Courts—millions of Muslims from failed Arab States, some of whom are, no doubt, actively in league with or who otherwise share sympathies with various Fundamentalist Islamic factions, all of which are resentful toward our Nation, its values, its laws, and which exhibit hatred toward our citizenry.

For those Islamists who are not radicalized on admission to this Country, there exists the inherent danger posed by radicalization, after the fact, as we have seen manifesting with disturbing regularity in this Country and in Europe.

Radical Islam constitutes a clear and present danger to the security of this Nation and to the safety and well-being of its citizens. Those who espouse utilitarian ethics piously endanger the safety and well-being of our citizenry.

Four: Congressional Democrats and Congressional Centrist Republicans adhere to and exhibit a fascination for neoconservative principals that reflect a desire for expanding influence–through any means—diplomatic or military—both in the Middle East and in the Baltic States. This expansionism merely for the sake of expansionism does not serve the security interests of our Nation and is, in fact, detrimental to our national security interests. It has cost our Country dearly in both currency and blood. Moreover, neoconservative policies have destabilized the Middle East. Dictators, such as Hussein, Gaddafi, and Assad have kept radical Islamic rebel groups at bay for decades. Removing two of the three has created a vacuum in the Middle East which has threatened the third. Would removal of Assad reverse the trend? Not likely. Nor would neoconservative policies designed to expand NATO influence in the Baltic States serve our Nation’s security interests. One need only consider how close the world came to nuclear annihilation when the Soviet Union encroached on our hemisphere through plans to plant nuclear weapons in Cuba, aimed at the U.S. We should not encroach on territory abutting Russia. Yet, this idea is not in line with the policies favored by the Congressional Democrats and Congressional Centrist Republicans that treat Russia as an adversary, even an enemy–policies that would in fact turn Russia into a most formidable adversary and enemy—policies in vogue with and pushed by Congressional Democrats and by Congressional Centrist Republicans and by the EU leadership, that profit from those who support them—the internationalist, globalist interests. These internationalist, globalist interests make their financial fortunes by promoting continuous tumultuous international tension, volatility, and upheaval. That is decidedly good for their profit margins. That is their upside. But, an unstable world has a downside for the American people: endangering their well-being, their own financial security, their very lives.

Five: the Congressional Democrats and Congressional Centrist Republicans seek to denigrate the notion of the inherent sovereignty of the Nation State. By undermining the value Americans place in this concept, Congressional Democrats and Congressional Centrist Republicans, seek, at the behest of the inordinately wealthy, immensely powerful, highly secretive, and utterly ruthless globalist, international forces that fund and control them, to loosen the historical ties that bind our Nation to its Constitution, that sanctify our rights and liberties, that solidify our values and traditions. With the loss of the ties that bind the American people to their Nation and to their National identity, the rights and liberties of the people are lost; the Constitution is undermined; the Nation’s great body of laws, it system of laws, the legal philosophical principals and jurisprudential underpinnings, all of which provide the foundation of our governance are subordinated to the legal system and laws of foreign courts and international tribunals. The sovereignty of our Nation is jeopardized.

Americans would see the eventual absorption of their Country into a wholly new economic, social, and political framework and reality—a new world order—a new economic, social, and political system mandating the disassembling of and the eventual eradication of the sovereignty of all Western Nation States. These Nation States would be reconstituted as subordinate elements within a large corporate consortium of member units, governed by a group of ruthless, inordinately wealthy and immensely powerful overseers who, alone, would wield supreme economic, political, and social powers over the masses. The masses would euphemistically be described as “citizens of the world”—a phrase even now coming into vogue through the assistance of the mainstream media.

This is what the destroyers of our Nation, of our Bill of Rights, of our history, of our traditions, and of our values, want, and that is what we will most certainly get, in time, if the powerful, secretive forces that seek to undermine Donald Trump’s Presidency prevail.

What is currently underway is no less than a quiet coup dˊétat of Government.

In Part three of this series we look at the mechanisms the destroyers of our Nation would use to bring down a United States President.

About The Arbalest Quarrel:

Arbalest Group created `The Arbalest Quarrel’ website for a special purpose. That purpose is to educate the American public about recent Federal and State firearms control legislation. No other website, to our knowledge, provides as deep an analysis or as thorough an analysis. Arbalest Group offers this information free.

For more information, visit:

Most Voted
Newest Oldest
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

President Trumps win last November makes it clear that “We the People” are finally waking up to the Tyranny of of the Commie/DemoRat/NWO/Rino LEFT..!!! Our Nation is in a Civil War right now and President Trump knows this! Our own Congress is full of TRAITORS to our Republic and our U.S. Constitution! Fellow Americans, OUR NATION is in real trouble and this summer the Soro’s Anitifa Commies are going to take this luke-Warm Civil War completely HOT! That is one of the reason’s the Traitors in the Military, Congress, and the Fraud Obama hold-overs are making sure our Troops are… Read more »

Wild Bill

@USPO, relax, the Soros paid libs do not have the intestinal fortitude to hold a regular job for long, much less start a hot civil war.


So you have the right to shoot dead people who are different from you? Sounds Muslim-ish.


So the short answer is returning to Whites-only immigration policy?

Clark Kent

Who said or implied that? Take a reading comprehension 101 class.

Wild Bill

@Clark, Where does GFYG, get the idea that immigration was ever based upon skin color? Country based immigration was the brain child of Ted Kennedy. Before that immigration was based upon having a skill that no American had (like the Leupold family). Before that I don’t know want it was.


Who then defines “us’ versus “them” then? What special values are being lost? Somehow I doubt certain values aren’t “lost” but diluted. It’s akin to the Christian is being told something worse than he’s banned from being a Christian (“they so afraid of Christianity they must ban it”) rather he’s free to Christian but it’s no more special alongside others’ religion (“wait, Christianity is the One True Faith and other religions are idolatry!”).


You are attempting to use reason with a Troll, certainly an effort in futility. Gil is probably completely unaware of the incident concerning the slave ship Amistad. This was a Spanish slave vessel where the captured Africans managed to take over and steer the ship away from it’s intended landing in the Caribbean and guide it to New England. Our white Founders fought Spain in our courts to free these slaves and allow them to return home to Africa. Spain was, in fact, the largest trafficker in Africans and went to war in order to defend this almost monopoly. We… Read more »

Wild Bill

@Dr S, Yes, it is an effort in futility. I don’t recall mentioning an “us’ versus “them” (sic) issue. Or lost values, or Christianity. Before Ded Kennedy got Congress to change the basis of immigration, immigration was based upon skills.
And thanks for the facts on the Amistad.


Gil you appear to be an intelligent individual but your ignorance hides it well. Mexicans are Caucasian (white as you would describe it) yet they should not be allowed to enter out country illegally. Nobody should. In fact, all well governed countries have very strict laws governing who is allowed to enter their countries. Germany for example, requires that if you were to go there to live, you must provide information to show you are financially or supported by someone already there secure BEFORE you enter the country. If you work there, you must obtain a permit and the work… Read more »

Wild Bill

@chiefton, If what you say is true about Germany, then how are all those moslems getting admitted?


Stupidity of a leader “educated” in the East Germany run by the Communists/Russians at the time.


They are getting admitted thanks to the idiocy of their leftist administrator Merkle who was raised and educated in East Germany when it was run by the communists.


If the survival of the United States of America, the Constitution, the Bill of Rights, the Nation State status, free from international rules ,policies, regulations, and economic dictates ,including but not limited to, the independence of the American citizenry from any from of a “one world” government , religion or ability to buy and sell goods and services, any restrictions on the self -defense mechanism of the United States of America and in general any infringement on the God given rights of any individual American citizen at any point in time be considered necessary, there should be inacted a ”… Read more »


The liberal lame brained moron spews its usual load of left winger liberal idiocy.

Kenneth Waggoner

The usual liberal line “You’re a racist” anytime you try to protect yourself, your family etc. It’s old, it’s burned out, I don’t care anymore, fine whatever. If trying to protect my family makes me a racist then so be it. By the way muslim is not a race fyi.