FPC Statement Following Tragic Santa Fe High School Shooting in Texas

Protest Gun Free Zones
FPC Statement Following Tragic Santa Fe High School Shooting in Texas

SACRAMENTO, CA – -(Ammoland.com)- Ten of our brothers and sisters in Texas died because craven politicians and the gun control lobby that feeds them would rather attack firearm owners and our rights than address the systemic issues that confront our nation today.

Yet again we see the disastrous consequences of reliance on magical thinking and mystical “gun-free” zones. Yet again we see that evil and insane people intent on causing death, injury, and chaos simply ignore the thousands of federal, state, and local criminal laws that criminalize conduct including murder, terrorism, assault, and illegally carrying guns onto school grounds. Yet again our news outlets show us proof that the evil and insane will find a way to hurt or kill the innocent in so-called “gun free” zones until they voluntarily end their attack, commit suicide, or are stopped by a hero – often one who is armed.

Sadly, this tragedy was all-too-predictable, not because our Constitution enshrines the fundamental human right to keep and bear arms, or that tens of millions of people in America exercise it, or even that there are hundreds of millions of firearms in the United States, but because un-American billionaires and their shrill, marionette front groups for global paternalism have a vicious and relentless agenda of transforming our country into a police state that benefits their lust for power, control, and money.

Thus, to the enemies of freedom and opponents of individual liberty, we offer the following: As we have said before, all constitutional rights have social costs – sometimes tragic and heartbreaking ones. But as the Supreme Court so aptly held in McDonald v. Chicago, “The right to keep and bear arms, however, is not the only constitutional right that has controversial public safety implications. All of the constitutional provisions that impose restrictions on law enforcement and on the prosecution of crimes fall into the same category.”

Our Constitution stands for the proposition that it is preferable for the People to live in freedom at some risk, perhaps even at the cost of some innocent lives, rather than merely exist in an oppressive and tyrannical scheme that, as history shows, comes at the cost of millions of lives every century. Our social interests in public safety and order were weighed and balanced when the People established the Constitution, enshrined the Bill of Rights, and enacted the Reconstruction Amendments. Indeed, in our very social fabric is the conscious choice to value individual liberty and limited government powers at sometimes great costs, over an arrogant and false sense of security at all costs.

We recognize that some do not feel bound by our Constitution. And we are well aware that some would prefer to see much of our constitutional guarantees stricken from the books. There are, of course, vehicles for such change. Article V of the Constitution provides a lawful way for our country to evolve our fundamental principles and protections through a re-weighing of those things we as a country wish to protect.

But – and never forget this truth – our human rights do not come from the government, the people, or even the Constitution itself. Our rights, including the right to keep and bear arms, would exist with or without official constitutional recognition of them, with or without judicial enforcement of them, and with or without a desire for them to be exercised or respected. To be very clear, it is nothing short of domestic terrorism for gun control advocates and their wealthy elitist backers to continue their assault on our rights and property by using illegitimate and unlawful means, even if those efforts are joined by willing accomplices in our legislatures, courts, and executive offices.

To our members, supporters, and fellow advocates of freedom, we say this: Stay the course.

Our cause of liberty is righteous, our goals just, and our labors necessary to preserving our unique and special Republic. Firearms Policy Coalition remains focused on defending and advancing individual liberty and, through these efforts, seeks to avoid yet another less-cold conflict to maintain the Union and our civil rights.

We will continue working to pass comprehensive legislation to restore access to the right to bear arms outside our homes throughout the nation. We will continue to press for strong federal preemption legislation to eliminate state and local restrictions on law-abiding people and access to constitutionally protected arms, ammunition, accessories, and training. We will continue to support important reforms of federal statutes and regulations that are in tension with the Constitution and put people at risk of severe criminal liability. We will continue to push for tax credits for firearm safety training and storage devices. We will continue to support real and effective firearm safe handling education in homes and schools. We will continue our legal action to oppose President Trump’s lawless executive actions on “bump stocks” that will turn law-abiding gun owners into felons. We will continue to fight against the specter of unjust ‘red flag’ restraining orders that separate people from their rights without even having an opportunity to oppose the action in a court of law. We will continue to oppose poorly-crafted, unconstitutional, and dangerous policies no matter where they originate or which political party may support them.

Firearms Policy CoalitionAnd we will continue to hold true to our mission of protecting the entire body of fundamental rights so that we, our members and supporters, and others may continue to defend the individual right to keep and bear arms for self-defense against unjust force—wherever it may come from.

Firearms Policy Coalition (www.firearmspolicy.org) is a 501(c)4 grassroots nonprofit organization. FPC’s mission is to protect and defend the Constitution of the United States, especially the fundamental, individual Second Amendment right to keep and bear arms.

23 Comments
Most Voted
Newest Oldest
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
brentwoodjon

Boy I sure would not want to be in his shoes [Taking a gun into a ‘Gun free zone’ I bet he gets 90days and loses his Gun!]

Roger

How about a national move to close school campuses and prevent monsters from entering those premises, similar to what we do with federal, state, county and city buildings, instead of the absolutely ridiculous notion of callin out “gun free zones”. I am 70, retired and an honorably discharged Army MP with no felony offenses, and still need to go through the CA background checks every time I want to engage in a firearms transaction, which in this state essentially means I am a registered owner, and the state could decide at any time that I shouldn’t retain ownership, but I… Read more »

Jim Hovater

I’m a teacher, former LEO trained in ASR, former corporate security supervisor, NRA member, dad, and grandpa. I’m also a CCW permit holder. I’ve been through more background checks than you can imagine. Yet I am DENIED MY 2nd Amendment RIGHTS because of my profession.

Marc DV.

@ Old Vet
Here ! here ! I like that, But
You Have to Add ALL Politicians Also !
They Make The Mess ,They Need to Live
With it Too !

Tionico

quote press for strong federal preemption legislation to eliminate state and local restrictions on law-abiding people and access to constitutionally protected arms, ammunition, accessories, and training. this is NOT what is needed. What IS needed is for Congress to make it clear that the Second means what it says, that there will be NO infringements upon our right to arms at any level, from any source, for any reason. TheTenth ARticle of Ammendment states that all powers not granted FedGov (power to regulate arms is NOT granted) or prohibited to the states (shall not infringe does not specify who may… Read more »

Tim

But please don’t think the Dems will do any better.

Marc DV.

When Was the Last Time Anyone ,
Saw A Politician in a Gun-free Zone
Before A Mass Shooting ( without Armed Security ) ?
Even After They Have Tons Of Guards When They
Come and Preach about Guns Afterwards (Armed to the Teeth)
So other than then? Can’t Recall Seeing Them There !

Repo

If these antiguners stopped attacking the 2nd amendment all the money used by both sides could have a percentage of it used to secure the schools and for armed security. This would cost nothing extra and actually save all that money that goes towards attacking the 2nd and forces us to spend to defend it. It would make schools safer and save more lives than any redundant law will ever do. The fact that they will never do this shows that saving lives is not the goal and disarming citizens is.

Darrell M.

I am of the opinion that the whole purpose of gun free zones was to wait for, and possibly instigate, these evil actions.
Reason being that the sheeple will be herded into demanding that our RIGHTS be taking away for sake of safety. Rather than providing for their own safety by standing ready and guarding the children they consider so precious.

PhantomPhlyer

Thousands and thousands of laws and yet there is one law that has been ‘on the books’ for over 2,000 years:
THOU SHALT NOT MURDER.

In the movie ‘Oh, God!’ – GOD (George Burns) asks Jerry Landers (John Denver) the following: “I gave you the Ten Commandments what else do you need?’

‘Nuff said/’