America’s oldest Second Amendment News outlet.
RSS feed
Reacting with lightning speed Thursday, the Second Amendment Foundation and National Rifle Association filed a federal lawsuit challenging Virginia’s new restrictive gun control law.
George Peterson’s case began with an armed ATF raid on his Louisiana home and business. It ended, at least for now, with the Supreme Court refusing to review his NFA suppressor conviction and a two-year prison sentence hanging over him.
Brady, Giffords, and Everytown are urging a federal court to uphold New York’s body armor ban, arguing ordinary Americans have no Second Amendment right to buy protective gear unless the state approves their profession.
After six years of litigation, the Pennsylvania State Police agreed to revoke its policy treating partially manufactured frames and receivers as firearms under state law. The Firearms Policy Coalition did not get a final merits ruling, but it secured the practical result it sought.
Attorneys representing the plaintiffs in a federal lawsuit challenging the constitutionality of the National Firearms Act (NFA) have filed a motion for summary judgment in U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Kentucky.
A new summary judgment motion challenges California’s AB 28 gun and ammo tax, arguing the state cannot put the Second Amendment behind a paywall through special taxation.
Plaintiffs in Heeter v. James say New York’s body armor ban is unconstitutional because it blocks law-abiding citizens from acquiring common defensive equipment.
Zimmerman, Firearms Policy Coalition, and the Second Amendment Foundation have filed a federal lawsuit challenging firearm carry restrictions in national parks, arguing the bans fail the Supreme Court’s Bruen test and unlawfully expand so-called sensitive places.
A federal judge upheld Texas carry bans at bars, racetracks, and sporting events in Ziegenfuss v. Martin, rejecting a Bruen-based challenge from gun-rights plaintiffs.
A Missouri federal judge has ordered supplemental briefing in Brown v. ATF, a case challenging the National Firearms Act’s registration scheme and the regulation of suppressors and short-barreled rifles.
Firearms Policy Coalition and a licensed New York carrier have filed a federal lawsuit challenging the Times Square gun ban, arguing it violates the Second Amendment under Bruen.
California’s gun advertising ban was struck down under the First Amendment, and the state now faces about $1.3 million in combined fee payouts tied to the failed law.
A federal judge expanded a major Second Amendment ruling against the post office carry ban, confirming the injunction applies to current and future FPC and SAF members.
Firearms Policy Coalition (FPC) issued a statement condemning the Trump Administration’s ongoing defense of federal gun control laws.
The 13-page motion exposes a post-judgment clash between gun-rights confidentiality and the government’s attempt to limit the number of people allowed to carry guns in post offices.
The case is seeking to get full Second Amendment rights to young adults in the 18-20-year age group who wish to purchase handguns, but are currently prohibited by federal law.
People do not lose their right to keep and bear arms when they visit California. With this injunction, they can finally protect themselves and their families while in the Golden State…
“The Trump DOJ’s scheme would gut nearly every lawsuit against the federal government unless and until the Supreme Court steps in,” said FPC President Brandon Combs.
Firearms Policy Coalition (FPC) has commenced appellate briefing at the Second Circuit Court of Appeals in Calce v. City of New York.
At issue are federal laws that ban licensed firearm dealers from selling handguns to buyers who live in another state.
Under HB 407, residents of any state will be able to acquire a Louisiana carry license and lawfully exercise their right to bear arms…
This outrageous regulatory scheme simply cannot pass constitutional muster and the Second Circuit should hold as much without delay…
The government’s ban preventing firearm dealers from selling handguns to people that reside in other states is unconstitutional. The ban has no historical support and cannot be justified under Supreme Court precedent.
The Biden-Harris Administration’s Emerging Firearm Threats Task Force report has once again demonstrated their complete and manifest contempt for the People of the United States and their constitutionally protected rights..
The Commonwealth of Massachusetts is not exempt from the United States Constitution and it cannot ban the sale of common handguns, full stop…
…law-abiding 18-to-20-year-olds are broadly restricted from exercising their fundamental right to carry firearms for self-defense and other lawful purposes in Pennsylvania,,,
The case of Paris v. Lara, revolves around the rights of 18-to-20-year-old adults to carry firearms for self-defense under the Second Amendment.
States like NY can not impose residency-based restrictions on constitutionally protected rights like the right to bear arms.
Too many lower courts are ignoring binding Supreme Court precedent because they do not like what the Constitution means. The district court in this case was wrong…
Refusing to stand down, Gun Activists have filed a new Second Amendment lawsuit challenging laws prohibiting individuals from carrying firearms at certain locations in the State of Texas.
