Gun Groups Challenge WA Ballot Initiative & Seek Invalidation

Confusing Washington Ballot Initiative 1639
Confusing Washington Ballot Initiative 1639 is filled with tiny unreadable fine print full of gun bans and taxes on gun owners.

BELLEVUE, WA – -(Ammoland.com)- The Second Amendment Foundation and Citizens Committee for the Right to Keep and Bear Arms recently asked the Washington State Supreme Court to invalidate Initiative 1639 and enjoin the Secretary of State to reject the petitions on the grounds that petitions circulated by paid signature gatherers failed to meet state requirements for readability nor did they include a “full, true, and correct copy of the proposed measure printed on the reverse side.”

“We publicly warned the initiative sponsors about these problems and they ignored us,” said SAF founder and Executive Vice President Alan Gottlieb. “We are now taking the issue to the state high court to seek a declaratory judgment and injunction.

“During the signature gathering process,” he continued, “we were contacted by several people who were alarmed at the unreadability of the text, and also because they could not really tell what changes they were being asked to make to existing law. The microscopic maze of fine print used by the initiative sponsors disguised the actual language of the measure on the back of their petitions, which violates state law.

“ Reading that petition is like taking a bad eye exam,” Gottlieb stated.

“When paid signature gatherers told people to ‘read it online,’ that simply did not meet the requirements of state law,” he noted. “Use of such fine print is unconscionable, and when you compound that problem with the omission of underlines for proposed changes to existing law, and strike-out lines showing what current law would be eliminated, it’s not just alarming, it amounts to deception.”

Gottlieb said there are “a lot of problems hidden in that small print.” The proposed measure not only impairs the rights of young adults to own modern sporting rifles, it classifies traditional semiautomatic rifles, even rimfires, as “assault weapons.” It adds a hidden tax, disguised as a paperwork processing fee, on the exercise of a fundamental right protected by the state and federal constitutions, and it requires an ill-defined standard of ‘safe storage’ that carries a felony-level penalty for a violation.

“How were voters supposed to know what they’re being asked to change,” Gottlieb wondered. “How could they tell the difference between what would become law, and what would be replaced?

“Just because this initiative is supported by wealthy Seattle elitists doesn’t mean it could be circulated in a form that violates the law,” Gottlieb said. “The court needs to step in enforce state law and the state constitution.”

Second Amendment FoundationThe Second Amendment Foundation (www.saf.org) is the nation’s oldest and largest tax-exempt education, research, publishing and legal action group focusing on the Constitutional right and heritage to privately own and possess firearms. Founded in 1974, The Foundation has grown to more than 650,000 members and supporters and conducts many programs designed to better inform the public about the consequences of gun control.

The Citizens Committee for the Right to Keep and Bear Arms (www.ccrkba.org) is one of the nation’s premier gun rights organizations. As a non-profit organization, CCRKBA is dedicated to preserving firearms freedoms through active lobbying of elected officials and facilitating grass-roots organization of gun rights activists in local communities throughout the United States.

  • 7 thoughts on “Gun Groups Challenge WA Ballot Initiative & Seek Invalidation

    1. Another epic fail in this proposed Citizens Initiative is this: The Wasington State Cosntitution provides that citizens initiaves, of which this is an example, can ONLY deal with ONE ISSUE for each Initiative proposed. This one sets out several separate issues: it changes the age to purchase, provides waiting periods, imposes a new tax, defines certain classes of weapons as prohibited, It hus is unconstitutional ON ITS FACE. To be lawful, EACH of these issues will require a separate initiative to be launched. EACH will then have to stand on its own merits or fall. Initiatves can NOT be omnibus bills.

      The same stunt was ulled back when these same Bloomburg funded marxists foised I 594 on us… I may have the umber wrong.. which imposed about six changes in state law…. the so-called Universal BackgrondCheck law that brought the end of private transfers. It demanded FFL’s perofrm a state function not mandated by their federal license, it changed tax laws, it changed handugn registration laws, it redefind the age at which one can purchase a handgun in this state, and a couple other things I’ve since forgotten. I pointed this FACT out to Second Ammendment Foundation, Citizens Committee for the Right to Keep and Bear ARms, and to Washingto ARms Collectors.. NO ONE paid any heed, right there was solid grounds to bring legal action to nullify the new law, but no one took any action to launch a legal challenge. VERY disappointing. Gottlieb,Workman, etc, need to bring THIS detail up before the high court of Wahington. That alpone makes the initiative dead in its tracks. WILL THEY? We shall see.

    2. Ahh, the seeds of californicate/kommiefornia have spread to the northwest. My fellow 2A’ers, welcome to socialist hell.

    3. When they were collecting signatures in front of my local Wal-Mart “as they always do” I asked the guy was there any gun laws in these bills,seeing as he had two others on top of it covering this one,he said absolutely not. Liar. I called bim out on it he said and i quote “you are the only one to catch that”. These people should not be allowed to collect signatures in front of these stores. They are liars,deceivers and paid to take away rights,that alone by itself should be enough to have this type of behavior outlawed. It’s not a choice when you are lied to. It is a choice taken.

      1. @Louis Barber, You mean like Michael Gruber of the Oblabla administration to get Oblabla Care passed into law.

    4. I was asked to sign petition for “sensible gun laws”. I replied, it’s not sensible gun laws-It’s Gun Control. I said it loud enough the petition person left. Too many people heard me.

      1. I was confronted outside of my local Safeway by a young male wearing a man bun. I looked over the petition and then politely informed this young male, that this was an illegal tactic to overthrow the Constitution of The United States of America. I informed him that his actions were in FACT Infringement of the 2nd and clearly Treasonous in nature, and that I would be calling the U.S. Marshals Service in King County to have him arrested and detained for Treason. I demanded his ID, the name of his supervisor and I kept applying pressure. He freaked out, his lower lip started quivering. I told him I would sit right here and make sure he did not leave while awaiting his arrest. He called two of his buddies for help. They showed up and I informed the others of the same as I had informed the first. They all became very afraid, took their petitions and clipboards and left the Safeway. Push-back can be painful if one is on the receiving end.

    5. The Washington State Supreme Court could care less about state law and the state constitution. It is merely another arm of the Dumocrats, who rule the roost in Washington State. This appeal will go down in flames. Count on this initiative passing; which means get your preferred semi-auto rifles NOW.

    Leave a Comment 7 Comments

    Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *