Idaho Senate Opens Door to Gun Confiscation Orders with SJR101 Vote ~ VIDEO

Firearms Confiscation Orders Gun Red Flag Laws
Idaho Senate Opens Door to Gun Confiscation Orders with SJR101 Vote

Idaho – -(AmmoLand.com)- The Idaho State Senate stunned the citizens of Idaho yesterday by opening the possibility of Idaho implementing Gun Confiscation Orders, better known as “Red Flag” laws.

Despite repeated warnings from the Idaho Second Amendment Alliance and gun owners across Idaho, the Idaho State Senate moved forward with their ill-advised resolution known as SJR101 or Marsy’s Law.

We’ll get to who voted for and against Marsy’s Law in just a moment.

States across the country continue to push through Red Flag Gun Confiscation Orders. Bloomberg and his cronies with Moms Demand Action are dumping millions of dollars in the fight to destroy the 2nd Amendment, and passing Red Flag laws is just one of their objectives They are determined to fight gun owners at the Congressional and State level. And one of their biggest pet projects is to confiscate firearms from gun owners who they feel are a threat to themselves or others. These “Red Flag” laws may sound great on the surface, but they remain unconstitutional and a threat to the American judicial system.

Let’s recap why Red Flag laws are so dangerous:

  1. There is NO conviction required to confiscate the gun owner’s firearms.
  2. There is NO arrest of the gun owner being accused.
  3. There is NO indictment of the gun owner being accused.
  4. There is usually NO notification that the gun owner’s firearms are about to be confiscated.
  5. The police show up at your door and confiscate your firearms with NO due process!

Red Flag laws fly in the face of everything our judicial system was designed to do — protect your innocence until you were proven guilty in a court of law.

So, how are Red Flag laws and Idaho’s current Constitutional Amendment proposal (SJR101/Marsy’s Law) similar?

Here is what we know about SJR101:

  1. The alleged victim has the right to “reasonable protection” from the accused. That means there is NO conviction.
  2. What does “reasonable protection” even mean? The legislators proposing this Constitutional Amendment only tell you what that phrase “typically” means. They can’t deny that a judge could order the confiscation of your firearms as “reasonable protection.”
  3. The “reasonable protection” would apply to any level of accusation, misdemeanor or felony. Again, no conviction is necessary.
  4. Some legislators claim that gun confiscation can’t happen because the 2nd Amendment would prevent it. While we agree that it should, the fact remains that thousands of infringements exist across the country, including right here in Idaho. The 2nd Amendment didn’t stop them.

The judicial system in our country continues to spit on gun owners!

Activist judges across the country continue to rule against the 2nd Amendment. 25 Idaho State Senators just voted to give the ability to implement gun confiscation orders in Idaho to Idaho’s judges.

Here is the breakdown of the Senators who voted in favor of SJR101 which will jeopardize your gun rights:

Agenbroad – R, Anthon – R, Bair – R, Brackett – R, Buckner-Webb – D, Burgoyne – D, Cheatham – R, Crabtree – R, Grow – R, Guthrie – R, Harris – R, Heider – R, Hill – R, Jordan – D, Lakey – R, Lent – R, Martin – R, Mortimer – R, Nelson – D, Nye – D, Patrick, Souza – R, Stennett – D, Ward-Engelking – D, Winder – R

We want to thank the following Senators for voting AGAINST SJR101 to not give judges the ability to implement gun confiscation orders in Idaho:

Bayer – R, Den Hartog – R, Johnson – R, Lee – R, Lodge – R, Rice – R, Thayn – R, Vick – R, Woodward – R

The battle to stop SJR101 isn’t over yet. Now that the resolution has moved over to the Idaho House, gun owners must continue to reach out to their legislators to oppose it!

Because this is a Constitutional Amendment, it requires a 2/3 majority in both chambers. That means that the Idaho Senate just barely made the threshold to pass it.

We anticipate our chances of killing this dangerous amendment is much better in the Idaho House. Once the resolution has been assigned to the appropriate committee, we will need your immediate help to encourage the committee to kill it!

In the meantime, be sure to check out a video next that we did last night which explains this crucial issue in more detail!

Thank you for your continued effort to stop a potential gun control disaster in Idaho!

For Freedom,

Greg Pruett
President
Idaho Second Amendment Alliance


Idaho Second Amendment AllianceAbout Idaho Second Amendment Alliance:

Idaho Second Amendment Alliance is a nonprofit, nonpartisan, single-purpose organization dedicated to preserving and protecting the Constitutionally protected right to keep and bear arms through an aggressive grassroots program designed to mobilize public opposition to the anti-gun legislation.
Our website can be located at www.idahosaa.org.

 

235 Comments
Most Voted
Newest Oldest
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Stan Jacobs

Too many Democrats hate America and vote accordingly. Too many Republican politicians are their enablers.

Jonnybees

After reading ALL the comments placed, from Feb.28, 2019 through March 29, 2019, AND, myself being 71 yo, born and raised in Wisconsin until moving to what was then The Golden State in 1974, and then watching the Culture and Politics change from Conservative to CORRUPT Progressive Liberal over the past 30+ years, I agree with all the Writers who are Concerned about this proposed ‘Law’. This is how it’s been done Politically in Kalifornia over the years, and why, after Practicing Acute Patient HealthCare for 40 years and now Retired, I purchased a 5 acre parcel and am building… Read more »

RG

I have read several comments here, and I totally agree with many that this a BS law. Yes, I am from California, a staunch Republican who also believes in our 2nd Amendment. This State of California is slowly becoming a state of illegals whom could care less about what our Constitution says. I have long wanted to relocate to your beautiful State but feel I would be hated. Not because I hunt and fish and love the outdoors but because I would be considered a conservative just because I am a Californian. But your State is far better than this… Read more »

Gdubb

RINOs are alive and well in Idaho. I thought this was the last Western bastion of hope. Why are so many Americans so stupid nowadays, willingly voting to hand over their rights?

Lyn

There is a huge hint as to the real problem in the bit of the article. All the ‘-R’s that voted for this Nazi idea. There MUST be a way to get these asshats out of office…and keep them out of office while they are misrepresenting themselves to everyone. They are without doubt -D. Ditch them.

Marty

Let a mother fucked come to my doorstep on my private property and try to take my guns. I will be buried 20 feet under before that happens. I will die for my rights. My grandfather always told me one day they will ask you to give up arms. You have a choice follow the sheep and die with honor. I’m going with choice two.

MrPhister

All they have to do is say conservative gun owners pose a threat and Boom you got full confiscation.

Pat Fisher

No one should be allowed to come into your home and take anything without due process, this bill is a crook of BS Needs to put on ballet for citizens of Idaho to vote on a few people should not be allowed to decide what the people of Idaho want if the governor has any balls he will veto it that bill gives police too much authority LET the people of Idaho vote on this bill.

superfly

A Gun is a Right
A Firearm is a10th Amendment privilege

There are no gun laws.
All laws specifically pertain to firearms, not guns.
Word trickery, Legalese semantics

The conversion oc a Right into a privilege

Can show the Federal definitions if anyones interested.

Unless you are LEO, active military, or a Cirearm instructor, your stock rifle, shotgun, pistol, or revolver is Not a Firearm (commercial use weapon)

Jamie

Actually, page 2 line 13 states “(D) Nothing in this section is intended to, or shall be inter-
14 preted to, supersede an accused’s federal constitutional rights,