
U.S.A. -(AmmoLand.com)- Yesterday, the Firearms Policy Coalition-supported H.B. 1927 has passed both the Texas House and Senate, sending “constitutional carry” (i.e., permitless carry) legislation to Governor Greg Abbott for his signature.
This essential legislation represents a historic achievement and landmark victory, restoring a more robust right to bear arms for tens of millions of people in the Lone Star state.
The Texas Legislature’s action on this bill is another powerful example of the nationwide movement towards restoring the full right to keep and bear arms and making the exercise of that right accessible to all.
On behalf of our members and supporters, FPC thanks Rep. Matt Shaefer, Sen. Charles Schwertner, Speaker Dade Phelan, and Lt. Gov. Dan Patrick for their hard work and commitment to passing this important legislation.
FPC will continue working towards the enactment of this legislation and other bills that expand human liberty and promote freedom.
Individuals that are interested in joining FPC in the fight for liberty and against tyranny can become a member of the FPC Grassroots Army for just $25 at JoinFPC.org.
Firearms Policy Coalition and its FPC Law team are the nation’s next-generation advocates leading the Second Amendment litigation and research space. Some FPC legal actions include:
- A brief supporting certiorari in NYSRPA v. Bruen, which was granted by the U.S. Supreme Court
- A challenge to Tennessee’s ban on handgun carry by adults under 21 (Basset v. Slatery)
- A challenge to Maryland’s ban on handgun carry (Call v. Jones)
- A challenge to New Jersey’s ban on handgun carry (Bennett v. Davis)
- A challenge to New York City’s ban on handgun carry (Greco v. New York City)
- A challenge to Pennsylvania’s ban on handgun carry by adults under 21 (Lara v. Evanchick)
- A challenge to the federal ban on the sale of handguns and handgun ammunition to adults under 21 years of age (Reese v. ATF)
- A challenge to Maryland’s ban on so-called “assault weapons” (Bianchi v. Frosh)
- Challenge to California’s ban on so-called “assault weapons” (Miller v. Calif. Att’y General)
- A challenge to California’s handgun “roster”, microstamping, and self-manufacturing ban laws (Renna v. Bonta)
- A challenge to Pennsylvania’s laws completely denying the right to carry to individuals who were previously granted relief from prior non-violent convictions and are not currently prohibited from possessing firearms (Suarez v. Evanchick)
About Firearms Policy Coalition
Firearms Policy Coalition (www.firearmspolicy.org) is a 501(c)4 nonprofit organization. FPC’s mission is to protect and defend constitutional rights—especially the right to keep and bear arms—advance individual liberty, and restore freedom through litigation and legal action, legislative and regulatory action, education, outreach, grassroots activism, and other programs. FPC Law is the nation’s largest public interest legal team focused on Second Amendment and adjacent fundamental rights including freedom of speech and due process, conducting litigation, research, scholarly publications, and amicus briefing, among other efforts.


Who knows. With a little more work Texas may just qualify as a free republic. Work on civil asset forfeiture, warrantless searches, drug law reform, and expansive concealed carry and you might just get there. Look to Arizona.
Another step forward.
When the Texas bill goes into effect over 50% of the land mass of the USA.
Well have permit-less carry.
this bill is a crude joke because:
“(h) ( 1) A peace officer who is acting in the lawful discharge of the officer’s official duties may disarm a person at any time…”.
Any one of the exceptions, exclusions, or understandings in the 50 pages of this bill or any other law which it references can be claimed and the officer will keep your property and deny you its use on the officer or any other malevolent entity who may threaten you.
So much for a Right, as opposed to governmental permission.
HLB
glad to see texas is finally catching up to Oklahoma. long overdue!
Saw another article about H.B 1927 passing that mentioned it would require NICS check (not new) as well an FFL. Hopefully the requirement to have an FFL was a mistake. Have you seen this???
Is this for concealed carry or only open carry?