Washington AG Files Lawsuit Against Gun Store for Violation of Magazine Ban

Magpul PMAG Gen3 (Window) 30 Round AR-15 Magazines
Magpul PMAG Gen3 (Window) 30 Round AR-15 Magazines

U.S.A.-(AmmoLand.com)- The Attorney General of Washington State filed a consumer protection lawsuit against Federal Way Discount Guns, claiming the store illegally sold magazines that held more than 10 rounds of ammunition.

It has generally been illegal for anyone to sell magazines that hold more than 10 rounds of ammunition in Washington State, since July 1st of 2022, this year. There are some specific exceptions. The law is being contested in the courts. From the complaint:

Plaintiff State of Washington, by and through its attorneys Robert W. Ferguson, Attorney General, and Ben Carr, John Nelson, and Bob Hyde, Assistant Attorneys General, brings this action against Defendants Federal Way Discount Guns, LLC, and its owner Mohammed Baghai. The State alleges that Defendants engaged in unfair and deceptive acts or practices, as well as unfair methods of competition, in violation of the Consumer Protection Act, RCW 19.86, and RCW 9.41.375. The State alleges the following on information and belief.

When the law was passed, it contained both a straight criminal statute, RCW 9.41.370, and a strange criminal statute that defines the distribution of magazines as an “unfair method of competition” under 9.41.375. This allows a civil suit to be brought to the court. From wa.gov:

RCW 9.41.370

Large capacity magazinesExceptionsPenalty.

(1)
No person in this state may manufacture, import, distribute, sell, or offer for sale any large capacity magazine, except as authorized in this section.

RCW 9.41.375 

Large capacity magazines—Unfair method of competition.

Distributing, selling, offering for sale, or facilitating the sale, distribution, or transfer of a large capacity magazine online is an unfair or deceptive act or practice or unfair method of competition in the conduct of trade or commerce for purposes of the consumer protection act, chapter 19.86 RCW. [2022 c 104 § 4.]

Civil suits are easier to prosecute than criminal cases. In a civil case, the plaintiff only needs to show a “preponderance of the evidence” instead of establishing guilt “beyond a reasonable doubt”. Washington State provides for jury trials on all civil cases except for traffic infractions.

Official prosecutors are unusual in the law. They have been given almost unlimited immunity from lawsuits themselves by an unprecedented legal decision at the Supreme Court in 1976.  In the case of Imbler v. Pachtman, the Progressive Burger Court declared prosecutors could not be sued.

Prosecutors may lie. They may present false evidence. They may withhold exculpatory evidence. But, according to the decision, no lawsuit can be brought against them.

In the recent Bruen decision at the Supreme Court of the United States of America, Magazine bans, which had been ruled to be constitutionally valid, back to the Third Circuit and the Ninth Circuit. The cases were granted certiorari, vacated by the Supreme Court, and remanded to the two circuits to be reheard, considering the restoration of the protection of the right to keep and bear arms under Bruen.

It seems likely magazine bans such as the Washington state ban will be found to be unconstitutional under the protections of the Second Amendment.  Court actions are not certain. Some of the courts seem to be playing delaying games, perhaps in the hope of progressive judges replacing those who say the Constitution has to be understood as it was written when it was ratified.


About Dean Weingarten:

Dean Weingarten has been a peace officer, a military officer, was on the University of Wisconsin Pistol Team for four years, and was first certified to teach firearms safety in 1973. He taught the Arizona concealed carry course for fifteen years until the goal of Constitutional Carry was attained. He has degrees in meteorology and mining engineering, and retired from the Department of Defense after a 30 year career in Army Research, Development, Testing, and Evaluation.

Dean Weingarten

32 Comments
Most Voted
Newest Oldest
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Wass

When you consider how the mere presence of state lines, like the line between NJ and Pa, in the matter of magazine bans, can mean the difference between freedom and a felony charge (with mandatory imprisonment), you see how egregious gun laws are.

Straight-Shootr

Idiots in the Peoples Repubelick of Pugetopia elect these morons, but we (Washington State) STILL need to go back to the ‘show up in person and vote’ method…

The anti gunners keep throwing Europe as the model to follow, EXCEPT when it comes to voting…

Most of Europe will NOT allow mail in balloting because of the ease of corruption.

Last edited 3 years ago by Straight-Shootr
StLPro2A

Abrams’ food never gets to a Tupperware container…..

Ledesma

Large mags. Small mags. If there’s a humanly way to get shot, pushy liberals will still find it!

TStheDeplorable

It’s odd that the state is forcing the issue by filing this suit. This is perfectly timed to fall into the collection of cases throughout the 9th Circuit that will be coming to the Court of Appeals in the next year in the wake of the Bruen decision. Even before Bruen most appellate courts were overturning bans on 20- and 30- round magazines, but after Bruen the would have to prove that 30-round magazines are BOTH dangerous AND unusual. The police cars that protect the courthouses all have rifles and 20- and 30-round magazines that were bought over the counter… Read more »

Steve

Washington, Oregon, California…..Maine, New Hampshire, Connecticut, New York, Delaware, Rhode Island, New Jersey, Maryland – all of you pathetic, coastal LOSERS that have gone full Socialist Mommy States…really sad. Of course, this list would not be complete without including the coastal state (barely) of Illinois with that Septic Tank of a city – Chittcago.

hippybiker

“The Lunatics Have Taken Over the Asylum!”

Montana454Casull

Didn’t the SCOTUS rule on this in California already ? I believe they ruled it unconstitutional if I am not mistaking. Does the state of Washington think they are exempt from the same ruling ? Time to cancel these unconstitutional bullshit laws and send all the crybaby gun grabbing sore chapped Gina’s a case of Premarin .

totbs

Ferguson will go after anything he doesn’t like. It’s hard to believe that people re-elected him, knowing his track record for abusing the citizens of this Tammany Hall nightmare of a state.

BigAl

Another take on this is that it could be a good thing for us as a whole. One of legal tactics the state uses is to say that the plaintiff has no standing as there has been no injury and promise that they don’t intend to enforce the provision anyway.

Now we have proof they intend to enforce the statute and a plaintiff that has standing. Let the games begin.

Last edited 3 years ago by BigAl