On Wednesday, starting at 1:00PM, the Senate Judiciary Committee will hear Senate Bill 2, to impose a Maryland-style “handgun qualified purchase card” and a handgun transfer registry. Please contact committee members and ask them to OPPOSE SB 2.
CLICK HERE TAKE ACTION!
Senate Bill 2 requires citizens to obtain a deceptively named “handgun qualified purchaser permit” to purchase or receive a handgun, with an exemption for carry permit holders. To obtain a permit, an applicant is required to, at their own expense, have taken approved training and to submit fingerprints, though the bill does create a voucher system for low-income individuals to cover the cost of training. The State Bureau of Investigation is allowed up to 30 days to issue a permit. Because permits are valid for only 180 days and training is only accepted if taken within the past five years, this creates recurring costs, delay, and hassle for citizens to maintain the ability to exercise their Second Amendment right to obtain a handgun. In addition, the bill also creates a registry of all handgun transfers.
Again, please contact committee members and ask them to OPPOSE SB 2.
About NRA-ILA:
Established in 1975, the Institute for Legislative Action (ILA) is the “lobbying” arm of the National Rifle Association of America. ILA is responsible for preserving the right of all law-abiding individuals in the legislative, political, and legal arenas, to purchase, possess, and use firearms for legitimate purposes as guaranteed by the Second Amendment to the U.S. Constitution. Visit: www.nra.org
Americans don’t ask permission to buy or build a gun, and we certainly don’t fall for a Nazi style registration and confiscation scheme. This is blatantly unconstitutional, and such ” laws” have no legal power, from the moment they are established.
Wholly void order before it ever gets signed.
Yup, and per SCOTUS precedent about laws repugnant to the Constitution, all 23,000+ gun control laws are likewise void, yet corrupt agents of gov are jailing and fining millions with them.
People need to go buy a handgun now before this BS takes effect.
“No State shall convert a liberty into a privilege, license it, and charge a fee therefore.” Murdock v. Pennsylvania, 319 US 105 (1943). … and
“If the State converts a right (liberty) into a privilege, the citizen can ignore the license and fee and engage in the right (liberty) with impunity.” Shuttlesworth v. City of Birmingham, Alabama, 373 U.S. 262 (1969)
Thank GOD I moved from Delaware.
Sorry Delaware, no new registries are allowed. 18 USC section 926(a) … (3)regulations providing for effective receipt and secure storage of firearms relinquished by or seized from persons described in subsection (d)(8) or (g)(8) of section 922. No such rule or regulation prescribed after the date of the enactment of the Firearms Owners’ Protection Act may require that records required to be maintained under this chapter or any portion of the contents of such records, be recorded at or transferred to a facility owned, managed, or controlled by the United States or any State or any political subdivision thereof, nor… Read more »
I think the problem with using 926, is the: “records required to be maintained under this chapter or any portion of the contents of such records, ” will probably be “interpreted” as only applying to federal records maintained under that chapter and doesn’t apply to states regulations and records, because the states do not require state “records to be maintained under this chapter”.
I follow your concern though one might also interpret the “relinquished by or seized” in the first sentence to be a greater hurdle. HOWEVER, the key phrase “under this chapter” would mean Chapter 44: Firearms, encompassing sections 921-934.