Opinion

The Second Amendment Foundation has submitted an amicus brief supporting the plaintiffs in a federal challenge of California’s ban on so-called “large-capacity magazines” in a case known as Duncan v. Bonta.
The brief was filed with the Ninth U.S. District Court of Appeals in San Francisco. SAF’s brief was prepared by attorneys Edward A. Paltzik, Serge Krimnus and Meredith Lloyd with Bochner PLLC.
The brief refutes California’s argument that gunpowder storage laws relate to the state’s magazine ban.
“California continues to grasp at straws by attempting to defend its magazine ban based on gunpowder storage laws,” said SAF Executive Director Adam Kraut, who is also a practicing attorney. “The contention that such laws are somehow analogous to the modern day prohibition of firearm magazines capable of holding more than ten cartridges is, at best, a giant stretch of logic. The state’s reliance on these laws suggests they have no credible justification for defending a ban which has already been declared unconstitutional twice.”
SAF was a plaintiff in an earlier challenge of California’s magazine ban, known as Weise v. Becerra, which was stayed pending the outcome of the Duncan case.
SAF founder and Executive Vice President Alan M. Gottlieb observed, “California has been fighting tooth and nail to defend an extremist gun control statute that common sense dictates is absurd, as well as unconstitutional, and unquestionably impotent in preventing violent crime. Attorney General Rob Bonta’s contention that gunpowder storage restrictions somehow equate to limiting the number of rounds in a magazine is ridiculous.”
As explained in the amicus brief, California’s statute “burdens the right to self-defense by mandating the use of limited capacity magazines. This unconstitutional statute is applicable only to the mechanism by which ammunition is loaded into a firearm and does not seek to regulate the quality or quantity of stored explosive material.”
Live Inventory Price Checker
![]() |
Imr Powder 4227 Smokeless Powder - 4227 1lb Smokeless Rifle Powder | Brownells.com | $ 62.99 |
|
|
Lee Precision, Inc. Deluxe Perfect Smokeless Powder Measure | Palmetto State Armory | $ 91.99 $ 70.99 |
|
![]() |
Accurate 5744 Smokeless Powder | Midsouth Shooters Supply | $ 511.99 |
|
![]() |
Imr 7828 Ssc Smokeless Powder - 7828 Ssc(R) 1lb Smokeless Rifle Powder | Brownells.com | $ 57.99 |
|
Second Amendment Foundation
The Second Amendment Foundation (www.saf.org) is the nation’s oldest and largest tax-exempt education, research, publishing and legal action group focusing on the Constitutional right and heritage to privately own and possess firearms. Founded in 1974, The Foundation has grown to more than 720,000 members and supporters and conducts many programs designed to better inform the public about the consequences of gun control.
Calif AG Rob Bonta wants a sane person to believe this fantastic Gunpowder Limitations tale? That’s really ALL they’ve got? Bwaaahahahahaha. Socialist tyranny comes up pretty thin on Constitutionally consistent ideology. No wonder all they know how to do is lie, cheat and steal. FGavin. FBonta.
IIRC, the analog test in Bruen requires the law to be similar in reason and method.
The powder storage laws in effect at the time of the founding were due to the desire to safeguard the community from the damage of large quantities of black powder exploding in a residential area.
The California magazine law is intended to limit the number of shots that can be fired without reloading.
Not the same at all so the California law fails the Bruen test IMHO.
Storage is like training and background. They hope to create a condition where compliance becomes impossible.
California should be penalized for such a stupid argument.
Another reason I left Kommiefornia. Anyone with over a pound of powder is a terrorist. So I am a terrorist at least 30 times over again or more. Now my pistols don’t pass the kommiefornia requirments which should be changing because the court found you cannot limit the amount of bullets in a pistol that a person can have.
Wake up kommiefornia, wake up Gavin, your days are numbered. You will never be president no matter how much pull Auntie Peolsi has.
the intelligent people of this country should start a lobbying effort to turn California into a mental health and criminal confinement area and build a fence around it.