SAF Files Amicus Brief with SCOTUS in S&W Legal Fight Against Mexico
Ammoland Inc.https://www.ammoland.com/Posted on by Alan Gottlieb
iStock-919659526
The Second Amendment Foundation (SAF) has filed an amicus brief with the U.S. Supreme Court in support of Smith & Wesson in its legal fight against the government of Mexico, which seeks to hold the American gun manufacturer liable for criminal acts of third parties in Mexico.
The 23-page brief was submitted by attorneys Thomas R. McCarthy and Tiffany H. Bates of Arlington, Va. It outlines the history of firearms litigation and explains why Congress adopted the Protection of Lawful Commerce in Arms Act (PLCAA) during the George W. Bush administration.
“As our brief explains,” said SAF Executive Director Adam Kraut, “allowing Mexico to prevail in suing firearm manufacturers for the criminal acts of third parties defies logic and would embolden a new round of lawfare against industry members. Ultimately, these lawsuits would drive many manufacturers out of business and potentially impose requirements on firearm designs that have been rejected by Americans. In the end, it is the American citizen who would suffer, as their choices for arms would be limited to the few surviving manufacturers. The Second Amendment is meaningless without the ability to acquire arms.”
SAF notes in its brief the Mexican government’s demand for literally billions of dollars in damages is exactly the kind of thing the PLCAA was designed to block.
“Almost 20 years ago,” SAF founder and Executive Vice President Alan M. Gottlieb recalled, “Congress passed the Protection of Lawful Commerce in Arms Act to prevent such litigation, which was essentially designed to bankrupt the firearms industry, thus endangering the ability of American citizens to exercise their rights under the Second Amendment. Allowing foreign governments to hold American firearms manufacturers responsible for criminal activity in other countries is both unjustifiable and preposterous.”
For more information, visit saf.org.
The Second Amendment Foundation (saf.org) is the nation’s oldest and largest tax-exempt education, research, publishing and legal action group focusing on the Constitutional right and heritage to privately own and possess firearms. Founded in 1974, The Foundation has grown to more than 720,000 members and supporters and conducts many programs designed to better inform the public about the consequences of gun control.
Background
The legal battle between the government of Mexico and U.S. gun manufacturers centers on the attempt by Mexico to hold American gun makers liable for criminal activities carried out by third parties within Mexican territory. This case is unprecedented in its scope and has significant implications for both international law and the firearms industry in the United States.
Mexico’s lawsuit seeks to obtain substantial financial damages from U.S. gun manufacturers, arguing that their products have been used extensively in violent crimes and drug-related activities within Mexico. The Mexican government contends that the gun makers are responsible for the flow of firearms into the hands of criminal organizations, contributing to the country’s ongoing violence and instability.
In response, U.S. gun manufacturers and their advocates argue that this legal action is fundamentally flawed. They assert that holding manufacturers accountable for the actions of individuals who illegally obtain and misuse firearms is not only unjust but also contradicts established legal principles. Furthermore, they emphasize that these sales were conducted in accordance with U.S. laws, and the manufacturers cannot control the downstream illegal activities that may involve their products.
The Protection of Lawful Commerce in Arms Act (PLCAA), passed by the U.S. Congress in 2005, is a critical element in this dispute. The PLCAA was designed to protect firearms manufacturers and dealers from being held liable for the criminal misuse of their products by third parties. Proponents of the PLCAA argue that the act is essential to safeguarding the firearms industry from crippling lawsuits that could threaten its existence and, by extension, infringe on the Second Amendment rights of American citizens.
Critics of Mexico’s legal strategy warn that a favorable ruling for Mexico could open the floodgates for similar lawsuits from other foreign governments or entities, potentially destabilizing the firearms industry and limiting the availability of firearms to law-abiding citizens. They argue that such outcomes would not only harm the industry but also have broader implications for constitutional rights and international trade relations.
The outcome of this legal battle is poised to set a significant precedent. If Mexico’s claims are upheld, it could lead to a reevaluation of the responsibilities and liabilities of firearms manufacturers in the U.S. and potentially across the globe. Conversely, a decision in favor of the U.S. gun makers would reinforce the protections afforded by the PLCAA and underscore the challenges of holding manufacturers accountable for the independent actions of third parties.
This case remains a pivotal collision of international law, domestic legislation, and the ongoing debate over gun control and manufacturers’ liability.
Maybe Mexico should have a suit filed against it for allowing their drug Cartel to cross the border with their drugs which have led to over 300,000 deaths of our citizens. 50 trillion should be about right.
Toxic Deplorable Racist SAH
23 days ago
Gee, why doesn’t Mexico sue Holder and O’Bozo? THEY are the ones that encouraged and enabled the cross-border trafficking of arms in the F&F debacle.
Unfortunately, Brian Terry was unavailable for comment.
Brian and Brian….Terry and Malinowski should be a rallying cry for Patriots.
Top
21 days ago
The Mexican government lets the cartels run through out the country with impunity! Hell the government is bought and paid for just like Biden and China. F___ the Mexican government
Bill
22 days ago
I wish some history of what the appealed issue was & lower courts rulings. I wonder how Mexico even has standing to sue in the US. Dims there treaty that gives the right?
StLPro2A
19 days ago
Legal filing probably a 50lb snoozer. Could have been handled succinctly….”Mexico go fuck yourself. Exterminate the cartels. Clean up your corruption. Then, get back to us. Have a nice life. BTW, Vets are gonna’ shut the border down, float the refuse down the Rio to the Gulf as fishy food. Pinky promise.!!!”
We use cookies on our website to give you the most relevant experience by remembering your preferences and repeat visits. By clicking “Accept All”, you consent to the use of ALL the cookies. However, you may visit "Cookie Settings" to provide a controlled consent.
This website uses cookies to improve your experience while you navigate through the website. Out of these, the cookies that are categorized as necessary are stored on your browser as they are essential for the working of basic functionalities of the website. We also use third-party cookies that help us analyze and understand how you use this website. These cookies will be stored in your browser only with your consent. You also have the option to opt-out of these cookies. But opting out of some of these cookies may affect your browsing experience.
Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. These cookies ensure basic functionalities and security features of the website, anonymously.
Cookie
Duration
Description
cookielawinfo-checkbox-advertisement
1 year
Set by the GDPR Cookie Consent plugin, this cookie is used to record the user consent for the cookies in the "Advertisement" category .
cookielawinfo-checkbox-analytics
11 months
This cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookie is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Analytics".
cookielawinfo-checkbox-functional
11 months
The cookie is set by GDPR cookie consent to record the user consent for the cookies in the category "Functional".
cookielawinfo-checkbox-necessary
11 months
This cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookies is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Necessary".
cookielawinfo-checkbox-others
11 months
This cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookie is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Other.
cookielawinfo-checkbox-performance
11 months
This cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookie is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Performance".
viewed_cookie_policy
11 months
The cookie is set by the GDPR Cookie Consent plugin and is used to store whether or not user has consented to the use of cookies. It does not store any personal data.
Functional cookies help to perform certain functionalities like sharing the content of the website on social media platforms, collect feedbacks, and other third-party features.
Cookie
Duration
Description
Cloudflare
30 minutes
This cookie, set by Cloudflare, is used to support Cloudflare Bot Management.
Performance cookies are used to understand and analyze the key performance indexes of the website which helps in delivering a better user experience for the visitors.
Analytical cookies are used to understand how visitors interact with the website. These cookies help provide information on metrics the number of visitors, bounce rate, traffic source, etc.
Cookie
Duration
Description
Alexa Analytics
1 year
This is an Alexa Analytics cookie that is used to track user behavior.
Alexa analytics service - keep track on user informations
30 minutes
This cookie is used to keep track on user informations and reports it to Alexa analytics service.
Google Analytics
2 years
The _ga cookie, installed by Google Analytics, calculates visitor, session and campaign data and also keeps track of site usage for the site's analytics report. The cookie stores information anonymously and assigns a randomly generated number to recognize unique visitors.
Google Analytics - Google Tag Manager
1 minute
A variation of the _gat cookie set by Google Analytics and Google Tag Manager to allow website owners to track visitor behaviour and measure site performance. The pattern element in the name contains the unique identity number of the account or website it relates to.
Google Analytics gid cookie
1 day
Installed by Google Analytics, _gid cookie stores information on how visitors use a website, while also creating an analytics report of the website's performance. Some of the data that are collected include the number of visitors, their source, and the pages they visit anonymously.
Google DoubleClick
1 year 24 days
The __gads cookie, set by Google, is stored under DoubleClick domain and tracks the number of times users see an advert, measures the success of the campaign and calculates its revenue. This cookie can only be read from the domain they are set on and will not track any data while browsing through other sites.
Google Tag Manager
3 months
Provided by Google Tag Manager to experiment advertisement efficiency of websites using their services.
Vimeo
2 years
Vimeo installs this cookie to collect tracking information by setting a unique ID to embed videos to the website.
YouTube
16 years 3 months 5 days
YouTube sets this cookie via embedded youtube-videos and registers anonymous statistical data.
Advertisement cookies are used to provide visitors with relevant ads and marketing campaigns. These cookies track visitors across websites and collect information to provide customized ads.
Cookie
Duration
Description
crwdcntrl.net - statistical data
8 months 26 days
The cookie is set by crwdcntrl.net to collect statistical data such as the number of visits, average time spent on site, and what pages have been loaded, for targeted advertising.
crwdcntrl.net - statistical data
8 months 26 days
The cookie is set by crwdcntrl.net to collect statistical data such as the number of visits, average time spent on site, and what pages have been loaded, for targeted advertising.
crwdcntrl.net - Statistical data 3
session
The cookie is set by crwdcntrl.net to collect statistical data such as the number of visits, average time spent on site, and what pages have been loaded, for targeted advertising.
doubleclick.net - browser supports cookies.
15 minutes
The test_cookie is set by doubleclick.net and is used to determine if the user's browser supports cookies.
Google DoubleClick IDE
1 year 24 days
Google DoubleClick IDE cookies are used to store information about how the user uses the website to present them with relevant ads and according to the user profile.
Quantcast
1 year 26 days
The __qca cookie is associated with Quantcast. This anonymous data helps us to better understand users' needs and customize the website accordingly.
Quantserve
1 year 1 month
Quantserve sets the mc cookie to anonymously track user behaviour on the website.
YouTube - bandwidth
5 months 27 days
A cookie set by YouTube to measure bandwidth that determines whether the user gets the new or old player interface.
YouTube - Store data on what videos from YouTube the user has seen - 2
never
This cookie, set by YouTube, registers a unique ID to store data on what videos from YouTube the user has seen.
YouTube - Store data on what videos from YouTube the user has seen.
never
This cookie, set by YouTube, registers a unique ID to store data on what videos from YouTube the user has seen.
YouTube - Store the video preferences
never
YouTube sets this cookie to store the video preferences of the user using embedded YouTube video.
Youtube - Track the views of embedded videos
session
YSC cookie is set by Youtube and is used to track the views of embedded videos on Youtube pages.
YouTube Remote Connected Devices
never
YouTube sets this cookie to store the video preferences of the user using embedded YouTube video.
_cc_id
8 months 26 days
The cookie is set by crwdcntrl.net to collect statistical data such as the number of visits, average time spent on site, and what pages have been loaded, for targeted advertising.
Maybe Mexico should have a suit filed against it for allowing their drug Cartel to cross the border with their drugs which have led to over 300,000 deaths of our citizens. 50 trillion should be about right.
Gee, why doesn’t Mexico sue Holder and O’Bozo? THEY are the ones that encouraged and enabled the cross-border trafficking of arms in the F&F debacle.
Unfortunately, Brian Terry was unavailable for comment.
Brian and Brian….Terry and Malinowski should be a rallying cry for Patriots.
The Mexican government lets the cartels run through out the country with impunity! Hell the government is bought and paid for just like Biden and China. F___ the Mexican government
I wish some history of what the appealed issue was & lower courts rulings. I wonder how Mexico even has standing to sue in the US. Dims there treaty that gives the right?
Legal filing probably a 50lb snoozer. Could have been handled succinctly….”Mexico go fuck yourself. Exterminate the cartels. Clean up your corruption. Then, get back to us. Have a nice life. BTW, Vets are gonna’ shut the border down, float the refuse down the Rio to the Gulf as fishy food. Pinky promise.!!!”