David Codrea

Is this the way we want the police to act? If they can do this to him, they can do it to you, maybe over a pistol brace or a false “red flag” report. And how do you think it would be “reported”?

In one fell swoop, The Times has reversed its position not just on “background checks,” but if you think about it, on “red flag laws,” too.

“But it showed a glaring problem in the law in Virginia:  All gun sales, even private ones, were stopped dead in their tracks until that system came back up.”

Remove violent criminals from society. And leave our guns and our children alone, just like the Founders intended.

So why should California Republicans (and those from other states where they think they can get away with it) do anything more than give lip service to gun owners, assuming they even need to do that?

If proven, it seems a curious relationship for a bank that presumes to be the “woke” moral arbiter for its customers’ right to keep and bear arms.

Look for Brazilians who question the election and defy tyrannical disarmament to be attacked and marginalized as extremists, criminals, racists, and “deplorables”…

Those can all be worthy goals for gun owners to aspire to, but they neglect the preservation and restoration of legal recognition of the right to keep and bear arms.

You don’t know what a lawless mob brazen enough to loot with impunity, with the implied threat that anyone who tries to stop them will be dealt with physically, will do …

Adair, Iowa Chief of Police Bradley Wendt was charged with unlawfully obtaining and possessing machine guns.

Yet “botched gun sting” has been the narrative parroted by the media and politicians, including far too many Republicans who should know better.

Brown did not identify the psychic technology that will allow Amalgamated to reliably predict future probabilities accurately enough to justify reporting citizens to law enforcement for investigation

To assume Schiff and fellow Democrats are the only ones who can be trusted is an obvious political move to keep claims from being verified while the freedom of citizens hangs in the balance.

Murphy also knows that just because an agent of the state is given an order, that does not make it lawful.

For whatever reason, the saying comes to mind that “a right delayed is a right denied,” derived from Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr., in his “Letter from Birmingham Jail”

Yet in spite of this, national and state gun groups are virtually all silent on “immigration”/invasion.

The 97percent “gun safety” organization purports to have a plan to reduce “gun violence” that can bring people on both sides of the issue together. Of course, it will do none of that.

Let’s now look at the four “policy” infringements the 97percent group wants to see imposed under the force of law.

You’ll note they purposely avoid telling you which guns they’re working on not allowing you to “purchase and possess.”

“December 07, 2022 (Wednesday) will be the last day to purchase ANY firearm without a valid Oregon Firearm Purchase Permit.”

“Because, while they might not supply weapons, they can effectively radicalize individuals to obtain them and put them to use — even from the comfort of their own homes via the internet.”

What that question fails to answer is the fact that a critical mass of gun owners would like to resolve things politically, but in the final analysis, Republicans need us more than we need them.

Contradicting those “principles,” in 2020, McMullin endorsed open borders, pathway-to-citizenship gun-grabber Joe Biden.

This is not science—this is propaganda and it’s a gross abuse of public trust by leftist quacks with a naked political agenda.

This is managed news, that is, propaganda and free publicity designed to sway political sentiment on a massive scale.

“A former policeman killed 34 people, including 23 children, during a knife and gun rampage at a daycare center in Thailand on Thursday”