CBS and CNN and the rest of the DSM are deliberately allowing their viewers and readers to be lied to.
In a way, we are put inside their skins, meaning once started, the book is hard to put down.
“Because of inaction, this Court has allowed the lower courts all the latitude they need to render the Second Amendment a paper tiger,” the brief charges…
Cummings had a personal culpability stake in seeing any investigation into “gunwalking” stonewalled, deflected and left to die on the vine.
It is really a simple request and the way they are going about fighting it and ignoring it is simply bizarre.
…not one single firearms owner has been entered into the service. However…the state has been requiring firearm owners to sign a waiver (of their constitutional rights) and collecting the fees…
This was exactly the rhetoric when Operation Fast and Furious “gunwalking” got its start…
It’s not the first time we’ve seen gun-grabbers create what became known as “Astroturf” gun groups.
What’s clear is, the danger from such internecine strife has the potential to be more destructive to NRA than anything Cuomo or Bloomberg could throw at it.
Why do identical findings of “did not establish” and “found no evidence” result in a furious demand for heads in one case and triumphant cries of vindication in the other?
The true guilty parties here are those who are making “violent revolution inevitable”…
… it would seem the only thing left would be to ban gun ownership.
Harris is pulling one of the oldest cons in the book, the “I’m a gun owner but” dodge, and in this case, her “but” is huge.
“Knives and butterfly knives as a form of knife are bearable arms… Butterfly knives as a form of knife are arms protected by the Second Amendment.”
If plaintiffs do not surrender or destroy their property by that time, they will be considered felons and subject to life-destroying fines, imprisonment and being designated “prohibited persons”…
An application to stay implementation and enforcement of the “bump stock” ban pending a writ of certiorari was filed Tuesday in the Supreme Court…
Wednesday’s decision is based on procedure rather than “shall not be infringed.”
What this means is, for now, the named plaintiffs, including this correspondent, will not be subject to enforcement action after the ban goes in effect Tuesday.
“New York State Police are hereby ENJOINED from enforcing New York Penal Law … as applied to ‘electronic dart guns’ and ‘electronic stun guns.”
Since Watts has an influential voice in shaping public policy through demanding gun laws, it’s fair to ask, in her executive capacity, what role she and those reporting to her played…
Without the ability to check what we are being told for ourselves, we are dependent on what “authorities” pass on to the “Authorized Journalists” to parrot.
In the … media scramble to get scoops before all the facts are in, it would be helpful to introduce some known information into the mix.
Not content to disregard the Second Amendment, the collectivists are bent on subverting the First (and more).
One of the ideas promoted by the gun-grabbers is that “we have a right to feel safe.”
Because aside from the one and only report, no local news outlets appear interested in the story and the Fox affiliate has gone quiet. Why?