Public defender Matt Gonzales showed some of his cards in an op-ed earlier this month by blaming the gun.
Natural human sympathy evoked by tragedies is not a pass for allowing grieving survivors to restrict the rights of others.
By presenting such “researchers” as the arbiters of what is moderate, it makes opponents seem unreasonable and extreme, which is the goal.
Yet the cultural terraforming, by all objective measures, represents the greatest growing threat gun owners will face.
Murray is the latest in a long list of Bloomberg mayors accused over the years of crimes that have resulted in numerous convictions.
So it would more accurately be described as the Manipulated Leftist Women’s March. Left unstated is who is doing the manipulation and why.
The feigned outrage doesn’t seem to extend to the fist representing One Pulse for America.
Once the headlines have been absorbed, reinforced biases will make unquestioning voters receptive to politicians promising more disarmament legislation.
The real objection is to any American having rights forcibly stripped without full due process.
That public officials will open carry while the practice has been criminalized for the whole people is exactly opposite of what was intended.
Everyone has opinions. There’s no indication that the respondents have informed ones. And that’s what Watts is counting on.
Obey or refuse to comply, and decide which choice endangers life and liberty the least.
He claims “over 95% of gun crime in Australia involves illegally imported guns” and then proposes what he calls “a happy medium” we all should be able to live with.
Why should an erroneously denied individual be on the hook for thousands of dollars to fix the government’s mistake?
In an honest report, armed citizens saving the day would have been the headline.
One area that won’t be as thoroughly explored is Hodgkinson’s purported Facebook pages, because they’re no longer active.
That seems to be the message of “Only Ones” everywhere, including here in the U.S.
“The National Firearms Registration and Transfer Record (NFRTR) is insufficient for criminal proceedings…”
The elites who can afford armed security details aren’t affected by edicts imposed on commoners.
Just ask yourself which you would rather have: U.S. sovereignty or the approval of some drunken Luxembourgian with delusions of global governance?
If the provocative words attributed to Barbeau were actionable, we’d have seen criminal charges. They are irrelevant to the core issue.
Can there really be such a thing as a “pro-gun Democrat”?
It’s better for the ultimate unity of the community if legislative differences are resolved…
So it’s not so much an “advocacy group” issuing organizational advisories as it is individual sellout “artists” assuming a role of masked propagandists in their “art.”
These elite establishment LEOs are the epitome of “Only Ones,” those who presume themselves to be trustworthy and competent enough to carry guns.