Who else has noticed that these are the same people who demand our guns?
“Just how much do you know about gun laws in the first damn place?”
Ideally, we should be working toward all three goals: A Second Amendment Sanctuary resolution, a Militia resolution, and a Second Amendment enforcement bill.
They make all gun owners out to pose the same risks as passed-out crackheads leaving guns within reach of three-year-olds.
Anyone with factory experience, aware of the myriad interrelated disciplines required, will quickly peg this arrogant poseur as a pure Astroturf figurehead.
I’m no surveillance pro, but isn’t it a cardinal rule not to let your subject know he’s being watched?
It’s hardly surprising that Chipman, a careerist with his snout in the disarmament trough, would want to point fingers at everybody else…
It has been designed to smear gun owners and advance citizen disarmament by swindling the ignorant into surrendering their rights.
The question really is: Why wouldn’t deputy Gill think corruption is systemic, lies are rewarded, and the only rule not to break is to not get caught?
“But I will say that even if the accusations are true, if anybody has redeemed himself through a life well-lived, that would be Michael Pfleger,” columnist Neil Steinberg hideously advocates.
In other words, those gathered in support of President Trump were (what did CNN call arsonists setting a building ablaze?) “mostly peaceful protestors.”
Anyone who tells you “this is just about a stupid piece of plastic” doesn’t understand the issue.
That’s a lot of government guns being deployed against unarmed citizens whose right, by Constitutional mandate, “shall not be infringed.”
Armed security for Cook? The CEO who “calls US inaction on gun control ‘insanity’?”
Note Pfleger wasn’t exactly consumed with concern for innocence and due process when he urged a mob to “snuff out” a gun store owner who had committed no crimes.
Contrary to the lies told by those who use that incident to discredit “stand your ground” laws, George Zimmerman’s legal defense did not use that argument.
That means if you don’t want to go, they’re not giving you a choice. Likewise, if you want to leave the facility, expect armed “camp guards” to say “No.”
It’s not like their political positions aren’t influenced by globalist and foreign government interests and investors from the Middle East and China.
They define an incompetent administration that revels in power but has no idea how to effect basic management controls.
If there is not massive noncompliance with the rule that comes out of this, they’ll only be encouraged when the time comes to order the surrender of our semiautomatics.