So our freedoms are now supposed to be defined by the fear level of the enforcers and those who deploy them?
That most mass media will not follow suit and instead share a”symbiotic relationship” with mass killers does not alter a fundamental truth.
Vox … refers to “developed nations” as the ultimate benchmark for demonstrating how barbaric America’s gun laws are when compared to the rest of the world.
Tellingly, the same “progressive” subversives complaining about how easy it is to send guns south across the border then turn around and demand the borders be open.
“I’m a Second Amendment guy, but no one needs a gun that just begs the owner to start shooting people.”
Serial compromises and betrayals that demotivate a growing number constituents ought to be what really scares Republicans.
That says a lot about the mindset, that political power is something to be seized, and that political opponents are to be disarmed.
Basically, none of these people — or those whose interests they serve — want your right to keep and bear arms to be recognized by the courts…
You wouldn’t tolerate a cheating spouse, would you? Why would you take it from a politician?
The weapons that were in common use at that time were precisely the arms the military had.
There is no such thing as a truly “pro-gun Democrat” politician.
What’s not unprecedented are gun-grabbing politicians who would deny you the right to protect yourself and your family while using tax plunder to make sure their safety is taken care of.
You may not possess any type of weapon in Fifth Third’s facilities, at work-related functions or while performing Bancorp business of any kind.
In other words, Levi Strauss intends to enable further Hogglike behavior…
Could the SPLC-style smear against non-Democrats be more blatant?
A study of WWII Germany’s innovative FG42, a technological breakthrough…
If that’s what they’d say about a man many of us considered unacceptably “moderate,” what must they want followers to think about those of us that are more hardline?
A thought I can’t shake is “Is this for real or are we all being punked?”
Yes, these are anecdotal, but there’s something to be said for the supposition that these misfits are projecting.
“Defendant FBI is unlawfully withholding records requested by Plaintiff pursuant to 5 U.S.C. §552.”
ATF was “not allowed to physically examine the interior of the weapons” recovered from the Las Vegas shooter’s hotel room…
That means the alleged hiding of “cancer danger” was going on during Shannon Watts’ watch. It’s legitimate to look at the work product she produced related to Monsanto’s defense of its product.
…the question remains why State did not pursue violations by DOJ – and who was involved in making (ordering) that outcome.
That we as individuals must take on a government with limitless resources to fight for our entitlements is an intolerable situation.
This has nothing to do with “commonsense gun safety” and everything to do with control. “We don’t trust you with knowledge. Best leave that to us.”