“Defendant FBI is unlawfully withholding records requested by Plaintiff pursuant to 5 U.S.C. §552.”
ATF was “not allowed to physically examine the interior of the weapons” recovered from the Las Vegas shooter’s hotel room…
That means the alleged hiding of “cancer danger” was going on during Shannon Watts’ watch. It’s legitimate to look at the work product she produced related to Monsanto’s defense of its product.
…the question remains why State did not pursue violations by DOJ – and who was involved in making (ordering) that outcome.
That we as individuals must take on a government with limitless resources to fight for our entitlements is an intolerable situation.
This has nothing to do with “commonsense gun safety” and everything to do with control. “We don’t trust you with knowledge. Best leave that to us.”
It’s not about controlling guns, it’s about controlling us as individuals, including the information they would “allow” us to access, from the files we own to the books we read..
While it appears NRA and NSSF were included, most organizations represented are a rogue’s gallery of gun-grabbers motivated to parrot talking points, not advance “science.”
Teachers shouldn’t have to be armed!” various sheep bleat, coming up with every excuse in the world to abdicate responsibility for their own safety and the safety of children.
It’s an interesting concept, and from an IRS perspective is no doubt compliant with tax rules. Whether ATF will consider it compliant with the Gun Control Act of 1968 remains to be seen.
Appeasing gun-grabbers, generally couched as “compromise,” is impossible.
His views could be critical if and when SCOTUS hears a case challenging state bans on what they pejoratively term “assault weapons.”
The “supreme Law of the Land” exists “to secure the Blessings of Liberty” for all – at least that’s the theory.
When did the State Department find out about Fast and Furious, and what was the Department’s role?
Does anyone really believe trying to drag NRA into the “collusion” conspiracy theory is simply a coincidence?
So basically, the FBI is denying you based on its database, and then wholesale refuses to allow you to appeal it.
[T]he manufactured individual vs. collective “controversy” actually did not arise until the gun ban lobby invented their argument…
“We’re pro second amendment” reveals itself to be not just a lie, but a big one.
Who thinks the Bloods, the Crips, the Latin Kings, MS-13, Vatos Locos, the 18th Street Gang and all the others will have their activities curtailed in the slightest?
It may turn out that Weinstein does not personally own any firearms and relegates the task of carrying them (in places “ordinary” citizens may not) to bodyguards (but I wouldn’t bet on it).
…nothing they demand will have the slightest impact on the violence that their own policies and edicts make inevitable.
…where is the consolidated itinerary of cities, locations, dates and times, and is withholding that information intentional?
Ladies, these people really don’t want you armed. And there’s no shortage of shrill, ignorant women who agree.
If they’re going to mandate we get approval from their system, it’s on them to make sure adequate resources are allocated to rectify errors.
The shameful level of subject matter ignorance is hardly new.