Any manufacturer who continues to supply Dick’s with anything firearms-related is choosing to give them aid and comfort.
These are precisely the measures gun owner rights advocates should expect from manufacturers.
Like “gun control,” it’s basically about driving a narrative and attendant actions with emotions rather than with verifiable facts.
It was done for no other apparent reasons than Kashuv disagreeing with prevailing “progressive” sentiment on guns.
Think of one job you’ve ever applied for where you’d have gotten it if you decided to play coy with the hiring managers.
While bump fire stocks were reported found in the suspected shooter’s hotel room, where are the official reports that the devices were used?
If someone is proven to be a danger, the only way to protect society is to keep him away from the rest of us for as long as he remains a threat.
Naturally, media bias against guns and for the rampant cultural terraforming that threatens to politically eradicate “legal” ownership will be the standard for “right thinking”…
Can such in common use at the time arms contribute to the common defense?
But he wants to expand infringements and punishments to be applied to prior restraints that have nothing to do with harmful actions.
“Under no circumstances should anyone bring a weapon to work.”
Perhaps cluelessness is something those behind putting Biden in positions of power can count on for reasons of their own.
These are non-negotiable terms of surrender, dictated by a “pro-gun” president, a “pro-gun” attorney general, and enabled by our “gun rights leaders.”
If a tyrannical government does repeal the Second Amendment it will not take away our right to keep and bear arms. Only we can give that up.
It’s pretty obvious that the gun-grabbing feeding frenzy we see going on is as much based on a cult of personalities as it is on anything else…
Are YOU giving aid and comfort to the enemy? Why?
The article is garbage and unworthy of a publication that includes the word “Scientific” (or “American”) in its title.
Once they’re off script, we’re basically dealing with people not necessarily more talented than those still waiting tables who never got a break.
Concessions on these measures by the NRA, which in turn gives the green light to Republicans, is nothing short of preemptive surrender.
He’s hardly the first criminal to call for citizen disarmament in the wake of his own aberrant behavior.
What Cox is doing is reining Trump back in, getting him to “walk back” preemptive surrender-signaling and stick to NRA talking points.
Have Yu Ning’s masters got some human rights examples for you!
You could give the antis everything they ask for… scratch that, everything they demand, and here’s what happened in a country that did:
If the object is to protect Americans from those who wish to do them harm, the “solution” will never be in a piece of paper with a disarmament order.
Plenty more examples exist to refute the reassurances that no wider disarmament goals exist.