The Department of Justice was originally formulated in order to protect the rights of the people of the United States. The DOJ’s role has morphed and changed over the years, perhaps been perverted. Is the Department under Bondi going in the right direction? Or is it time to step up?
The Trump DOJ’s brief in Vincent v. Bondi shows a smart play to protect the Second Amendment—reviving rights restoration while sidestepping a risky Supreme Court fight that could set bad precedent.
If you want relief, contact your state representatives, the Democrat ones who are passing citizen disarmament edicts, and ask them not to.
It appears to be the first time in history the government—in this case the Department of Justice—has taken the side of gun owners. The case, known as Wolford v. Lopez, challenges Hawaii’s Act 52..
“The new project I’ve got going in the civil rights division to the surprise of many people on both sides is the Second Amendment.” – Assistant Attorney General Harmeet Dhillon, DOJ Civil Rights Division
In Knife Rights’ Second Amendment lawsuit against the unconstitutional Federal Switchblade Act we hoped that the Trump administration would come through on the President’s executive order “Protecting Second Amendment Rights” Unfortunately, NOT!
Colorado House Republicans urge Attorney General Pam Bondi to review the state’s new gun control law, arguing it violates gun rights.
So, what gives with Podolsky’s very public filing, siding with notorious New York Democrat gun prohibitionists? And will AG Bondi and her new appointees now rein him in and slap him down?
Gun rights leaders and legal scholars could be identified and nominated to analyze and prioritize bills, lawsuits, regulations, opportunities, and threats, to advise on judicial and other federal nominees, and to help educate the public.
The DOJ announced the formation of the “Second Amendment Enforcement Task Force,” setting off praise from the gun rights community and drawing the ire of the anti-gun syndicate.
Gibson’s inclusion smacks of political favoritism, Bondi’s move is part of a long overdue effort to restore the 2nd Amendment rights of “prohibited persons” who pose no threat to public safety.
It’s been roughly 60 days since Pamela Bondi stepped up as Attorney General under President Trump, and the pro-gun community is talking.
“If the NRA decides to seek further review at SCOTUS, I am directing my office not to defend this law.” – Florida Attorney General James Uthmeier
Trump’s DOJ has made it clear: going forward, they will focus on truly dangerous criminals—not law-abiding citizens caught in the web of arbitrary gun laws.
Many cases could be reviewed, but a few stand out as violating not only someone’s right to bear arms but also free speech and entrapment.
The internal memo from the Attorney General highlights a strategic shift in ATF resources to tackle what the administration considers more pressing issues.
President-elect Donald Trump’s nominee for Attorney General of the United States, Pam Bondi, gave some troubling answers on guns during her confirmation hearing in front of Congress.
I believe in asking political candidates and nominees specific questions that demand unequivocal answers…
Bondi’s nomination is expected to face smoother confirmation in the Senate, but her record on gun rights has sparked concerns among Second Amendment advocates.