Today is Tuesday, May 22, 2012rss RSS feed

SKS Rifle Owner Prevails in Chicago “Assault Weapon” Case

Yugoslavian SKS 7.62x39 Rifle

SKS Rifle Owner Prevails in Chicago "Assault Weapon" Case

NRA-ILA

NRA - ILA

FAIRFAX, Va. --(Ammoland.com)- In a case supported by the NRA, David Lawson, who had previously been a plaintiff in McDonald v. Chicago, challenged the decision by the City of Chicago not to allow him to register two normal SKS rifles with fixed ten-round magazines.

Although the rifles do not meet Chicago’s definition of an “assault weapon,” Chicago refused registration because they were “convertible” into “assault weapons.”

The city denied the registration in spite of the fact Chicago has a separate provision for dealing with registered rifles that are converted into “assault rifles” after registration.

Following an initial rejection and preliminary appeal before a hearing examiner, the case was appealed to the City Court. The judge ruled the hearing examiner had to take evidence as to whether the guns were actually capable of accepting a detachable magazine, which is one of the criteria to define a rifle as an “assault weapon,” and sent the case back to the hearing examiner.

At the hearing, Mr. Lawson and his counsel presented the SKS rifles for examination by the court, but the two “expert witnesses” for the City, both police officers, refused to even touch them.

The judge ruled in favor of Mr. Lawson and ordered the rifles to be accepted for registration.

This case shows how far the city will go to deny law-abiding citizens their Second Amendment rights, refusing to abide by its own regulations until forced by the court.

Ammoland Click to read AmmoLand FTC Marital Disclosures Distributed to you by - AmmoLand.com – The Shooting Sports News source.
  • 2 User comments to “SKS Rifle Owner Prevails in Chicago “Assault Weapon” Case”

    1. Bullsh*t!! Forcing an owner to register a firearm – ANY firearm – is INFRINGEMENT of the RTKABA. Read the definitions, people. Any elected official, appointed judge or bureaucrat that violates the Constitution is guilty of TREASON.

      Impeach. Try. Convict. Sentence. …?

    2. Comment link | Neil Evangelista | October 22nd, 2011 at 5:35 AM
    3. “At the hearing, Mr. Lawson and his counsel presented the SKS rifles for examination by the court, but the two “expert witnesses” for the City, both police officers, refused to even touch them”

      sounds like the expert witnesses were coerced/ordered by someone not to touch them. ~OR~ they were afraid of there incompetence rubbing off on the weapons devaluing them probably for the best.

    4. Comment link | tmuir | October 22nd, 2011 at 3:56 PM

    Leave a Comment

    • Firearms News Daily sign up

      captcha

    • Recent Comments

      • Charmaine KLaus: This law must be kept as written. Citizens have a right to defend themselves outside of their home...
      • Bill: Sooo.. what does this have to do with Washington State????
      • chad collins: This article says some good things but don’t forget president Bush and the Republican party are...
      • Aide Lym: Aw, this is an incredibly nice post. In idea I would like to put in writing such as this additionally...
      • wesp22: Let’s put this in perspective: If you are in a “shoot your way out” situation and...
    • maximum
      Login with Facebook: Log In
      Powered by Sociable!
    • Facebook Activity

    Copyright 2012 AmmoLand.com Shooting Sports News | Sitemap | Μολὼν λαβέ