Today is Thursday, April 24, 2014rss RSS feed
Letters to the AmmoLand Editor

Letters to the AmmoLand Editor: Got something on your mind? Let us know and you can see it here.

Gold Beach, OR --(Ammoland.com)- I previously wrote of fighting the proposed encroachment on our 2nd Amendment Rights using the model of Mothers Against Drunk Driving.

This included mandatory punishments for violations of the law, expanding the information available for background checks, and encouraging people to report those who could be a danger if armed.

The push by the Progressives and Liberals to further restrict our 2nd Amendment gun rights continues. Did they feel the same about restricting any of the other rights in the Bill of Rights? Let’s start with the 1st Amendment.

Many citizens were being injured or killed in automobile accidents caused by talking or texting on cellular telephones. Were cellular telephones banned outright? Was an age limit placed on owning a cellular telephone? Were background checks required on anyone wishing to carry a cell phone? Was texting banned? The answer to all of the above is a resounding “NO”. What, then was done.

Law or regulations were put in place to impose a fine on those caught talking on the cell phone or texting while driving. Do they take away your cell phone if you are caught breaking the law? Again, the answer is “no”. You can have all the gadgets in your car you can afford to allow you to continue to talk on the cell phone and text if your cell phone has enough gadgets. To summarize, a costly slap on the wrist is what you can expect regarding the 1st Amendment and cell phone use in automobiles.

Let’s look at the use on the internet, an excellent example of our exercise of the 1st Amendment right to free speech. It has been widely reported in the news of the cyber bullying that has led to citizens/students committing suicide or hate crimes. What should we do?

If you use the standards being used to limit the 2nd Amendment Rights, we will have to do the following:

  • Place an age limit on those wishing to buy a computer/smartphone or set-up an internet account.
  • Perform a background check on any purchaser of a computer, Smartphone, or anyone seeking internet access.
  • Limit access to social media sites.
  • Require a special permit to have a computer/smartphone that is concealed from view.
  • Limit the speed and storage capacity of hard drives and SD cards.
  • Take away wireless capabilities for internet access.
  • Ban use the internet for life of anyone convicted of bullying or causing a death or injury to another.

Do you think this is ridiculous? It is exactly what the Middle Eastern countries are doing to their citizens. Their citizens are also disarmed. How is that working out for them?

Food for thought…..

- Georganne Greene

Ammoland Click to read AmmoLand FTC Marital Disclosures Distributed to you by - AmmoLand.com – The Shooting Sports News source.
  • 2 User comments to “1st Amendment Versus 2nd Amendment Rights”

    1. Seanoamericano on February 19, 2013 at 2:38 PM said:

      I always hear about the 2A only covers firearms of the day. Applying this logic then the 1A Freedom of Speech only applies to hand set type offset printing press media and public speaking in the town square. Your point is well thought out. Its like them seeing the truth about the medications and the effects they have. Big pharma paid to stay out of the light.

    2. Seanoamericano on February 19, 2013 at 2:49 PM said:

      Yearly permit fees
      Only use 1 function at a time.
      Cell free zones
      Limit memory cards to 128 mb
      Cant pass cellphone on must turn it in
      Must be stored in a phone vault when not in use.
      to block access by minors.
      Doctors must as if parents own phones
      Cell phone owners must tell school officials if the own phone
      Mr and mrs America turn in those phones
      Public officials will of course be exempt from this

    Leave a Comment

    • Sign up Ammoland for your Inbox

      Daily Digest

      Monthly Newsletter

    • Recent Comments

      • Paul: There are probably many more that could be added to that list. I had one anti gunner say that people...
      • Janek: An informed “world view” almost always trumps the mainstream media’s “talking...
      • TSgt B: The “Executive Director” of the Ohio Coalition Against Gun Violence admitted during a televised...
      • Janek: This is just another way that California government interferes in lawful commerce to achieve it’s goals.
      • D. Murphy: democraps at work again, this is what they have planed for the whole country.
    • maximum
      Login with Facebook: Log In
      Powered by Sociable!
    • Facebook Activity

    • Google+ Direct Connect

    Copyright 2014 AmmoLand.com Shooting Sports News | Sitemap | Μολὼν λαβέ

    Sign up for the Ammoland Daily Digest

    * indicates required
    Daily Digest is a daily recap of Firearms industry news, 2nd Amendment politics , and product articles delivered to the inbox. Stay informed to keep your Individual Right to Keep and Bear Arms.
    Yes, I want the Monthly email newsletter subscription to Ammoland so I can get a single newsletter once a month on the hot new products from the Firearms Industry!
    9103352
    9604064