Today is Monday, April 21, 2014rss RSS feed

LIMA – For Mercer County Sheriff Jeff Grey, it’s a no-brainer.
By Sarah Stemen

Buckeye Firearms Foundation

Buckeye Firearms Foundation

Ohio --(Ammoland.com)- If the United States Congress passes new gun control laws, including a ban on assault weapons for law abiding residents, he won’t enforce it.

“Let me make it crystal clear, the Mercer County Sheriff’s Office will not be confiscating firearms from law abiding citizens,” Grey said.

His position comes in defiance of the National Sheriffs’ Association, which represents more than 3,000 county sheriffs across the country. The NSA met this month in Washington, agreeing to support President Obama’s push for tougher laws to prevent gun violence.

That decision has caused a growing divide in the group, but how big of a split is debatable. The organization’s president, Larry Amerson, insists it is just a small minority of the nation’s sheriffs, but every day seems to bring more news reports of sheriffs across the nation who are speaking out against the decision.

Among them are at least four sheriffs from the Lima region – Sam Crish of Allen County, Al Solomon of Auglaize, Mike Heldman of Hancock and Grey.

“I’ve always taken the stance that people have the right to bear arms and to protect themselves,” said Crish. “I’m certainly not in favor of taking guns from law abiding citizens. That’s their right as it is now.”

Heldman recently wrote a letter to Obama, stating, “Any federal law which infringes on the right of citizens of Hancock County to keep and bear arms will not be tolerated, recognized or enforced by me or my office.”

The two sheriffs that have been the most vocal on the issue are Grey and Solomon.

“I do not believe that I am answerable to the president of the United States. I am answerable only to the citizens of Mercer County who elected me,” Grey said. “Every four years they get the opportunity to decide if they want to keep me or fire me.”

Grey maintains such a position does not violate his oath of office to uphold the laws of the United States. In fact, he argues that he is honoring his oath.

“If I am to uphold my oath, I must follow the Constitutions that say the Supreme Court has the final word,” Grey said. “Even many liberal members of the court have upheld the Second Amendment and I believe the court will continue to uphold it.”

According to a pro-gun-rights group that is promoting and tracking the opposition, there are now six state associations and 262 individual sheriffs who are on record opposing any new gun control measures.

“The president doesn’t have any more authority to write a law than I do, so he should leave it to Congress to write the laws and the courts to interpret them,” Grey said.

Both Grey and Solomon said they have been flooded with calls on the issue. While they don’t mind, they encourage people to contact lawmakers to voice those opinions.

“I believe in the Second Amendment and I think there are some things that can be adjusted besides just taking firearms away from the public,” Solomon said on Tuesday.

One of those things, Grey said, is taking better care of the nation’s mentally ill.

“I don’t believe the help is available to some that need it most. I have reservations about saying the mentally ill should be forever barred from having a firearm,” he said. “I certainly don’t want a mentally ill person to have one, but I do believe one can recover from mental illness with proper treatment/care.”

Amerson told National Public Radio that those sheriffs who say they won’t enforce laws they deem unconstitutional may be exceeding their authority. Others who support the sheriff’s association, such as Sheriff Ted Sexton from Tuscaloosa, Ala., argue that while gun ownership is a right, it can still be restricted. The right to bear arms, they claim, is not like other constitutional guarantees, such as the right to vote, or freedom of speech.

Instead of opposing any new gun control measures, Amerson told NPR that he wants the sheriff’s association to be at the table when the laws are being written.

“We’re going to be working on policy points – things that we think could be implemented, be really easily done and have an effect, a positive effect. Not every sheriff is in full agreement, but the vast majority of us are,” Amerson said.

Hardin County Sheriff Keith A. Everhart said his stance at the time is simple.

“The Hardin County Sheriff will enforce and uphold all of the United States Constitution as well as the Constitution of the State of Ohio,” he said in an emailed statement. “That is the oath I took and will live by.”

So far, eight Sheriffs in Ohio have vowed to uphold and defend the Constitution against Obama’s unlawful gun control measures. Has yours? If not, call and ask them why!

http://cspoa.org/sheriffs-gun-rights/

  • A.J. Rodenberg – Clermont Co.
  • Al Solomon – Auglaize Co.
  • J. Steve Sheldon – Richland Co.
  • Jeff Grey – Mercer Co.
  • Michael E. Heldman – Hancock Co.
  • Michael Simpson – Preble Co.
  • Mike Heldman – Hancock Co.
  • Sam Crish – Allen Co.

About:
Buckeye Firearms Association is a grassroots political action committee dedicated to defending and advancing the right of Ohio citizens to own and use firearms for all legal activities. Visit: www.buckeyefirearms.org

Ammoland Click to read AmmoLand FTC Marital Disclosures Distributed to you by - AmmoLand.com – The Shooting Sports News source.
  • 4 User comments to “Local Sheriffs Refuse To Enforce Obama Gun Control Proposal”

    1. Bill Baker on February 19, 2013 at 12:11 PM said:

      http://cspoa.org/sheriffs-gun-rights/
      for the current list for the country

    2. Roger Snyder on February 19, 2013 at 8:29 PM said:

      How can two different police organizations appear to have different stances on gun control? Simple, police are appointed by politicians. If they want to keep their job, they had better tow the line philosophically with their bosses. Sheriffs are elected directly to their office by the public. I have never heard of a Sheriff running on a gun control platform. But politicians are also elected by the public, so what part of this don’t I understand?

    3. Here in California I see absolutely zero difference between police and sheriffs, they’re all scumbag pigs.

    Leave a Comment

    • Sign up Ammoland for your Inbox

      Daily Digest

      Monthly Newsletter

    • Recent Comments

      • Jim: Hummmm, the government has declared a three mile no fly zone around the Bundy ranch area. Little drones do not...
      • Rich: Oh yeah the Rav4 my neighbors daughter just bought one…cute little car. Maybe next time do a write up on...
      • Gregory Smith: They’re very nice, I own a Beretta Nano in green, so I can appreciate those wild colors. The...
      • Ryan: @CT, I disagree, Ammoland already has tons of content related to guns, it must be 99% of what they publish. I...
      • james armstrong: THW GOVERNMENT HAS IT’S OWN AMMO MANUFACTURING PLANTS, THEY MAY HAVE A CORNER ON THE COMPONENT...
    • maximum
      Login with Facebook: Log In
      Powered by Sociable!
    • Facebook Activity

    • Google+ Direct Connect

    Copyright 2014 AmmoLand.com Shooting Sports News | Sitemap | Μολὼν λαβέ

    Sign up for the Ammoland Daily Digest

    * indicates required
    Daily Digest is a daily recap of Firearms industry news, 2nd Amendment politics , and product articles delivered to the inbox. Stay informed to keep your Individual Right to Keep and Bear Arms.
    Yes, I want the Monthly email newsletter subscription to Ammoland so I can get a single newsletter once a month on the hot new products from the Firearms Industry!
    8855240
    9376712