By Derek Bernard
France –-(Ammoland.com)- During the afternoon of Wednesday, 5th September, a British family were attacked in their car while on holiday in France, near Chevaline.
The 3 adults were shot to death, together with a cyclist, while 2 little girls in the car survived the attack.
Many of the news reports attempt to link the event to the strictness, or lack of it, of gun control in France.
For instance, Henry Samuel, Daily Telegraph, 5th September 2012, included the following:
“France has one of the highest levels of civilian gun ownership in Europe, with far more relaxed gun laws than the UK.
Handguns, semi-automatic weapons and pump-action shotguns are legal if held by active gun club members who must have a licence for them and undergo a medical check.”
As with virtually everything uttered by governments, police and the media on the subject of gun control, gun ownership and criminal violence, the purported linkage has no connection to reality. But this constant, almost subliminal, flow of distortion maintains and strengthens the fearful fantasy that guns, in and of themselves, are dangerous, nasty things that will turn ordinary, non-violent people into criminals and ordinary criminals into murderers.
This fantasy is what drives the European love of complex, expensive, slow and inconvenient gun control procedures, such as gun registration.
In 2007 the Harvard Journal on Law & Public Policy published an article by 2 of the world’s leading researchers, Professor Gary Mauser and lawyer Don Kates. It contained this interesting paragraph:
“One statistic stands out: There are 9 European nations which have less than 5,000 guns per 100,000 population and 7 that have more than 15,000 guns. The average murder rate of the 9 low-gun ownership nations is 3 times higher than the murder rate of the 7 high gun ownership nations. That is apparently because nations w/ high murder rates adopt stringent gun laws, but these don’t work, so high murder rates come to coincide w/ low gun ownership.”
It was very disappointing to read correspondent, Henry Samuel (5th/6th September), attempting to link the laxity or otherwise of French gun control laws with the murder of a family of British tourists.
French gun laws are not “relaxed”. Like the UK’s they are complex, expensive and highly anti-social in their effects. In addition to their negative effects on sport, pest control, hunting, manufacture, and distribution, as well as police efficiency, they, just as in the UK, disarm honest victims.
Does Mr. Samuel think that these killers, who clearly wanted to kill every witness to whatever they were up to, went to the “relaxed” French police and asked if they could have a gun or two as they had some murders to commit?
Jersey, British Isles