The Question Feinstein, Cuomo, Bloomberg Don’t Consider & The Media Won’t Ask


The Question Feinstein, Cuomo, Bloomberg Don't Consider & The Media Won't Ask
The Question Feinstein, Cuomo, Bloomberg Don’t Consider & The Media Won’t Ask
AmmoLand Gun News
AmmoLand Gun News

USA –-( How many Citizens is the government willing to kill in the push for firearms disarmament?

As debate continues around the Country and in the Capitol about new and draconian gun control laws there is a glaring, as yet unaddressed question that those in Congress and the Pro Gun Control side seem incapable of even considering and the media hasn’t even begun to ask.

Just how many Citizens, having committed no crime other then peaceful non compliance with an Unconstitutional and treasonous gun control scheme are the gun grabbers willing to kill in furtherance of their agenda?

NY State Rep Jerry Nadler, during an interview about the proposed Feinstein / Cuomo mandatory buyback scheme was quoted as saying he thought the very idea was “insane“.

Which itself is damning evidence that those in favor of gun control, be they politicians or the media are arrogantly dismissive of, and not even considering the possibility of resistance to their plans.

And not considering the very real possibilities of defensive violence against oppressive government is a sure sign that people like Adler, Feinstein, Lautenberg, McCarthy and their followers are completely unfit to hold positions of high Office.

It shows they are so convinced of their power, that the idea of someone not complying with their edicts is alien to them. It reveals they are so hopelessly out of touch with the American people that they have either no idea how people really feel or simply don’t care and will happily enact whatever laws they feel like, and if a few million people die as a result? Oh well. No rational and sane person, especially not someone that views themselves as a “leader” would so crassly dismiss even the most unlikely of unintended consequences to their actions.

The fact of the matter is, there are in fact millions of Americans who will not comply with ANY new gun control laws and are willing to risk and if necessary, sacrifice their lives defending themselves from oppressive aggression at the hands of the State.

Feinstein, Bloomberg, Lautenberg, and the rest are coward, plain and simple. No one sees them offering to give up their 24/7/365 security details (armed with actual “assault weapons” , while they demand the “little people” be disarmed.) That’s what a true leader does, sets the example with their own conduct and choices as an example for others to emulate.

You wont see Rham Emmanuel, Barbara Boxer, Sheila Jackson Lee or any of the leaders of the Anti Gun Side going door to door to demand Citizens turn in their firearms. No, they’ll stay safely ensconced behind their walls, with their armed security guards and send others to do their dirty work.

For all their talk about “wanting to save lives” , those at every level of the Gun control movement are quite happy to sacrifice however many lives it takes, on both sides of the issue, on the altar of their ideology.

There is nothing immoral about a Citizen defending themselves, with force if necessary, from the aggressive actions of the State.

After being arrested and sent to the gulag for being a “political dissident” Aleksandr I. Solzhenitsyn had this to say about how the prisoners regretted not fighting back against the Police State :

“And how we burned in the camps later, thinking: What would things have been like if every Security operative, when he went out at night to make an arrest, had been uncertain whether he would return alive and had to say good-bye to his family? Or if, during periods of mass arrests, as for example in Leningrad, when they arrested a quarter of the entire city, people had not simply sat there in their lairs, paling with terror at every bang of the downstairs door and at every step on the staircase, but had understood they had nothing left to lose and had boldly set up in the downstairs hall an ambush of half a dozen people with axes, hammers, pokers, or whatever else was at hand?… The Organs would very quickly have suffered a shortage of officers and transport and, notwithstanding all of Stalin’s thirst, the cursed machine would have ground to a halt! If…if…We didn’t love freedom enough. And even more – we had no awareness of the real situation…. We purely and simply deserved everything that happened afterward.”

Social media of all types has been abuzz since word first leaked about the Feinstein /Cuomo confiscation plan and only increased in recent days as word got out over the plans for ending the Second Amendment in Illinois, NY State, Iowa and others, of people publicly declaring that they will not comply and will fight if it comes to that.

Things will not end well if Congressional Leaders and others refuse to acknowledge and do not consider and heed these warnings and take them seriously.

During the Revolutionary War, estimates from historical records show that only 3% of the population of the Colonies supported the patriots in their fight against tyrannical rule by Britain.

If only 3% of the 80 million gun owners in the United States stand up and fight back, that is greater then the total of every member of Law Enforcement and the Military combined. And a significant percentage of the Law Enforcement and Military Communities will simply refuse to folllow orders such as confiscating weapons, searching properties without probable cause and a warrant or firing on Citizens whose only desire is to be left alone and have their rights respected.

So the percentage of manpower available to the Government to carry out their plot versus the number of Citizens willing to fight them is even more lopsided in the Citizens favor.

The government actively planned for, assaulted and eventually assassinated those they wanted to make an example of at Ruby Ridge, and Waco Texas, and make no mistake, particularly with regard to Waco and the Branch Dravidians , that was a deliberate, “made for TV” , attack, the State showing the people live and in full color and stereo sound for days, exactly how far they were willing to go, and what they were willing to do, including the murder of children, to send a message to any who would dare resist the forces of Government in the future.

If cooler heads in Congress don’t prevail and put a decisive stop to the evolving plot to disarm Americans who have committed no crimes, because of the isolated actions of a a handful of deranged criminal’s, things are going to reach a point of no return, and there will be enormous amounts of bloodshed on both sides, while those that deliberately set out to engineer and set in motion that violence sit back with a smug smile of satisfaction.


More articles, commentary and information by D. Roberts available at That Every Man Be

Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

I would like to say that in some ways I have MORE respect for the true hardened criminal. Lets look at some facts and run some scenarios. Criminals: Noun A person who has committed a crime. Crime:Noun An action or omission that constitutes an offense that may be prosecuted by the state and is punishable by law. In my opinion based on my understanding of the Federal constitution drug laws are unconstitutional. And therefore can not be enforced with proper authority. When a "criminal" is transporting large quantaties of drugs deemed "illegal" by law he is prepared to defend himself… Read more »


GUN FIGHTERS! That's all I hear. TALK. Where were you when they came for open carry? Where were you for handgun safety certificate(2003) where were you in 2001 for the roster of handguns? Or in 2000 for more "assault rifle" laws? Stoke the fear and fight for your guns. But please don't call yourselves "FREEDOM" fighters. Why don't you fight for right to FREE travle? The right to decide what to put into your bodie? The right to be secure in ones possessions? Are you willing to shoot a cop on sight? If your not you will loose your freedom!… Read more »


Any consider and I'm probably preaching to the choir, the mass shootings were arranged. And authorized for gainful interest. Using meridas emotions to rally with anti gun liberals, thus gain population in gun gun control and the inevitable disarming law abiding citizens. It very disgustingly hen you think about what ourvGoverment really wants and the heartless ways they will go bout it. In the end our own Goverment will turn on its own people to pave the way for the rise to power when the UN comes in and re-names america the land if the bought and paid for. Those… Read more »

Walking Turtle

As a sixty-year veteran of my beloved birth-country's sold-out "leaders'"(sic) State-Sponsored Culture Wars on all the Rest of Us here on Turtle Island (aka "America" too), I for one can only applaud all the strong, beautiful and utterly hearty responses of all the responsible (and increasingly hard-pressed) owners and operators of all manner of serviceable firearms in the great land of ours. Being Indigenous, I for one do know the value of one's energetically standing with all others who themselves know the value of a well-armed Home Defense. Tradition: The stake is driven into the ground. The sinew binds the… Read more »

Woody W Woodward

The gun grabbers won't personally dirty their hands with our blood. They don't have the stomach for it. They will order someone else to do it for them. And, there are some oath breakers who will comply with their wishes. We, every damn one of us, have to answer this question … Are we willing to kill the poor dumb bastards they send? That very well may be what it boils down to. It won't be Feinstein, Biden, Lautenberg, Obama,or Bloomberg who shows up on our doorstep in the middle of the night, it's going to be somebody we know,… Read more »

JD U.S.N Veteran

Molon Labe!

Johnny Nightrider

I am ready for civil disobedience and civil war if need be to keep my God given right to self protection and the protection of others.Many people come to America to be free.Alot of blood has been spilled and lives layed down to keep the freedoms of America.Many have died and been wounded and have fought to keep America free.Freedom is not free.I will lay down my life to keep my freedoms.These laws are unconstitutional and infringe on our 2nd Amendment right to keep and bear arms.There are 100 million gun owners and if we stand together we will win.Lets… Read more »


Test. How you read my commo?

King Oscar the 2nd

Contrary to what the prohibitionists believe are "assault weapons", the citizenry of the United States do not own "assault weapons". Which fall under the category of full automatic weapons. (Please note the absence of the word "assault", which is a "made to order fable" to describe full automatic weapons). What ought to be banned are ill minded people who try to abuse and loot our U.S. Constitutional rights as written in the Bill of Rights. We are witnessing true marxist ploys to wreck, ruin, and trash our Freedom and Liberties. Just ask any of them the meaning of an "assault… Read more »


Any and all Americans that give up one gun or submit to one new Gun law is , in fact , NOT an American but a cowardly communist . If the very first Americans react to gun grabbing by opening fire on the grabbers we would immediately put them on notice that their LIFE is the cost of my right to self-defense . Stay alert to their coming so that you can at least increase the price of YOUR gun .


Was it not Holgren (Sp), a part of the obama regime that said "we may have to KILL 25 million conservatives to convince the rest we are CORRECT". We know why they have purchased 1.6 billion rounds of hollow point ammo.


Rallying together won't do much unless we can make inroads into the non-shooters or inactive shooters.

Take a friend to the range.

Garvin M. Durrant

I have served in 5 wars, from Viet Nam to Iraq. I pay my taxes, and I work hard to Provide for my family. Why is my goverment trying to pick a fight with me? Because that's what it's coming to.

Average joe

This is A true to fact article. Yes there will be blood shed on both sides. But it did miss one important part. Thoses that put these bans in place may be setting back and watching from their ivory towers with a smile on their face. In the end they will be dragged from them and if they survive will be charged. Convited and put to death for treason. They should consider the statements on these storys as a warning. Because in the end we will tear down their ivory towers and JUSTICE will be done upon them


Great article And right to the point. We The people, that are law biding citizens will not stand for some a**hole in political office thats going to tell us what is good for there Free America. Bullshit, I am a veteran,NRA member and a Law biding citizen of this country If I must die to protect the Bill of Rights I will and to protect all of my Freedom loving countrymen. I dont think I need to say more


Excellent, excellent article, Mr. Roberts, thank you. How many will really stand with those Patriots who are ready to defend EVERYBODY'S rights with their lives, fortunes and sacred honor? Count me in! I'm no "Rambo", not by any means. My eyes aren't even what they used to be, but I can see real well under a hundred yards or so and I can still shoot d*mn well! It won't be any problem at all to hit whatever comes through my front door to steal ANY of my firearms, semi-auto or not! I figure we can take out tens if not… Read more »


Excellent article….I believe now that more and more American's are rallying together and are standing up against this progressive liberal gun grabbing scheme….Most American gun owners realize that the horrific tragedy at Newtown,is being used as a excuse by the liberals for their gun control agenda. Gun bans, and gun control, controls nothing as the first ban that expired in 2004 proved. And the liberals know this …The only thing that these worthless bans would do, would be to take even more rights away from our law abiding citizens,for liberal ideology…Pathetic.