Fight Continues in New York Against SAFE Act and Dozens of Other Anti-Gun Bills

New York
Fight Continues in New York Against SAFE Act and Dozens of Other Anti-Gun Bills
NRA - Institute for Legislative Action
NRA – Institute for Legislative Action

Fairfax, VA -(Ammoland.com)- Lawmakers are entering the final weeks of the 2015 legislative session in Albany, and NRA continues to focus its efforts on the partial and/or complete repeal of the SAFE Act.

We are also actively engaged and working against the hundreds of anti-gun bills that remain in the hopper. Make no mistake, our adversaries are not satisfied with the deeply flawed SAFE Act and continue to push for even more draconian restrictions.

Just this month, the Senate Codes Committee defeated a pair of gun control bills. We successfully opposed a ban on .50 Caliber guns and the mandatory storage of firearms.

  • Senate Bill 2050, sponsored by state Senator Daniel Squadron (D-26), would have banned .50 Caliber rifles, which are almost exclusively owned by collectors and competitive shooters. Anti-gun legislators have never been able to demonstrate cases where this gun has been used in a crime. This legislation would have zero impact on public safety and would do nothing but add insult to injury to the state’s already beleaguered firearms community.
  • Senate Bill 2491, sponsored by state Senator Liz Krueger (D-28), would have forced gun owners to lock up guns in the home, which would only give criminals an advantage. This legislation is dangerous and renders firearms useless in self-defense situations. S.2491 would have created six new crimes within article 265 of the penal law in addition to creating felony penalties. Every household is different and firearms storage should be a matter of personal responsibility, not mandated by legislation.

Downstate, anti-gun legislators also continue to push for microstamping legislation, Assembly Bill 6192, introduced by Assemblywoman Michelle Schimel. This bill has been successfully defeated for a decade, and there are assurances from the Senate Majority that the bill will not progress through the State Legislature.

Given anti-gun legislators and Governor Cuomo’s commitment to gun control, legislative reforms are going to be challenging to achieve, but your NRA will continue the fight to advance the interests of gun owners and sportsmen. New York gun owners’ also have the option for relief from the misguided gun control laws in the courts. Accordingly, NRA has provided direct financial assistance and legal resources to the lawsuit challenging the SAFE Act.

The Senate Majority recently underwent a leadership change and there at least appears to be a willingness to revisit some of provisions of the SAFE Act. Specifically, NRA is focusing on repealing provisions of this dreadful law that prevent passing along previously legal firearms to family members, and we support a pair of bills to do just that. Senate Bill 3373, introduced by state Senator Patrick Gallivan, authorizes the transfer of legally possessed and validly registered weapons to stay in families through estate planning. Sen. Patrick Gallivan also introduced Senate Bill 3377 which expands “immediate family” language in SAFE Act to include siblings, grandparents, and grandchildren. Of course, NRA will continue efforts to achieve a full repeal of the SAFE Act.

NRA is also fighting to end the state’s funding of the ammunition background check database. As a result, we met with legislators during budget hearings in April. In New York, the Governor has broad funding authority, and it is very difficult to block lump sum appropriations. However, we plan to continue to fight this waste of taxpayer money on an unconstitutional infringement, just as we did successfully with CoBis. These are just a couple of examples of how we are targeting SAFE Act reforms in the event that full repeal isn't successful at the Statehouse.

Please continue to follow NRA-ILA alerts for further updates as we continue to fight these battles for law-abiding New York gun owners in both Albany and the courts.

About the NRA-ILA

Established in 1975, the Institute for Legislative Action (ILA) is the “lobbying” arm of the National Rifle Association of America. ILA is responsible for preserving the right of all law-abiding individuals in the legislative, political, and legal arenas, to purchase, possess and use firearms for legitimate purposes as guaranteed by the Second Amendment to the U.S. Constitution.

For more information, please visit: www.nra.org. Be sure to follow the NRA on Facebook at NRA on Facebook and Twitter @NRA.

  • 3 thoughts on “Fight Continues in New York Against SAFE Act and Dozens of Other Anti-Gun Bills

    1. The anti gun fools in Albany are trying to pass laws that are virtually unenforceable. Nobody will lock up their guns at home, people will start reloading or buying their ammunition out of state and smuggle it in. Micro stamping technology does not exist. The elected sheriffs will not enforce unconstitutional gun laws and citizens will continue to use normal capacity magazines. There will be wide spread contempt and flagrant violation of the New York State safe act. It will leave Como and his cronies left with ineffectually pounding on their desks in the state house. If the governor tries to use the state and city police force to enforce his dictates he does so at his own pearl. He will never ever be able to appear in public again as his personnel safety and his families safety will be at great risk. There are many many expert riflemen in the civilian ranks with lots of retired Marine Corps scout snipers that have the ability and the tools to take out the governor from over 1000 meters. No body guards would be able to protect him or his family and I think he knows this as do all of the other elected gun grabbers in New York. I do not advocate this kind of violence but once it starts and if it does start New York, could just be the spark to start the second American revolution and 4th generation warfare.

    2. “Senate Bill 2491, sponsored by state Senator Liz Krueger (D-28), would have forced gun owners to lock up guns in the home, which would only give criminals an advantage.”

      The mere fact that this prog introduced this bill demonstrates that Democrats have no respect for SCOTUS precedent, unless such precedent supports their ideological dogma. This attempt thumbs its nose at D.C. v. Heller, which categorically ruled that storage mandates are unconstitutional.

    Leave a Comment 3 Comments