Police Warn English Subjects Against Using Guns to Resist Terrorism

By David Codrea
In response to terrorism, police are warning English subjects to run, hide, and tell.

A different time: A sergeant instructor explains the working of a rifle to two members of the Home Guard Local Defence Volunteers (Imperial War Museum).
David Codrea in his natural habitat.

USA – -(Ammoland.com)- “A police commissioner has caused alarm among rank and file officers by suggesting that members of the public who own guns could help defend rural areas against terror attacks,” The Guardian reported Monday. “Alison Hernandez, the Devon and Cornwall police and crime commissioner, said she was interested in having a conversation with the chief constable about whether ordinary people with gun licenses could assist in a terrorist crisis.” (audio below)

“Under no circumstances would we want members of the public to arm themselves with firearms, not least because officers responding would not know who the offenders were, and quite obviously they would not have the time to ask,” Devon & Cornwall Deputy Chief Constable Paul Netherton quickly responded, discouraging such a conversation from happening, let alone resulting in any change to the U.K.’s draconian gun bans and restrictions. “Our message to the public is a simple one: to run, to hide and to tell.”

“Fight”? With what?

That seems to be the message of “Only Ones” everywhere, including here in the U.S., where our Department of Homeland Security adds an anemic “fight” to the instructions, without adding how someone disarmed by “rules” is supposed to do that and what the odds are likely to be for success.

Further agreeing with Constable Netherton, and further asserting that U.S. gun laws enable and abet terrorists, are American gun-grabbers, with their position laid out in The New York Times. That allowing insufficiently vetted foreign nationals into the country in the first place may be a factor is left unexplored. Also ignored are how many killers took advantage of “gun-free zone” restrictions and the inconvenient truth that the five million members of the National Rifle Association – arguably the most heavily-armed civilian population on the planet,” have a lower homicide rate than Britain.

It’s clearly not the guns.

“(European-style terror attacks are) going to be the new normal in our world,” former NYPD Commissioner and LAPD Chief Bill Bratton predicted in a “No, duh!” moment. “That type of attack is quite likely to occur in the United States at some point in time.”

And true to carrying on in the finest European traditions, Bratton has been a career denier of the right of the people to keep and bear arms.

“What we are beginning to remember is that for thousands of years everyone on this island was armed at all times with daggers—with swords if you could afford them, with throwing axes and longbows for truly special occasions,” a guest post on The Burning Platform reflects ruefully. “Personal defence was not just a choice, it meant accepting full responsibility for individual safety beyond city or castle walls. Defending ourselves with grace and strength and skill was something we once took great pride in.”

American gun owners should look at what’s happening “across the pond” and view it as a canary in a coal mine of sorts, and a predictor of the shape of things to come. And all would do well to remember that when it comes to “gun violence” and terrorism, the UK ain’t seen nothin’ yet.

About David Codrea:

David Codrea is the winner of multiple journalist awards for investigating / defending the RKBA and a long-time gun owner rights advocate who defiantly challenges the folly of citizen disarmament.

In addition to being a field editor/columnist at GUNS Magazine and associate editor for Oath Keepers, he blogs at “The War on Guns: Notes from the Resistance,” and posts on Twitter: @dcodrea and Facebook.

122 Comments
Most Voted
Newest Oldest
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Alan

Re the leadin headline, Police Warn English Subjects Against Using Guns To Resist Terrorism,given that few of the referenced SUBJECTS have access to arms, the point might be moot. That said one wonders as to what action, if any, might be acceptable to the police who it seems issued this warning. What, one wonders might Joe Blow, English Subject, do? Possibly “assume the position” and offer up a quick prayer. Seems to me that the game they, the police say the “subject” should play, is a loosing game, but then while I lived in London for a time, many years… Read more »

truckeral

Of course, cower and die is a far better choice. What a**holes !

Aardvark

“Under no circumstances would we want members of the public to arm themselves with firearms, not least because officers responding would not know who the offenders were, and quite obviously they would not have the time to ask,” – Netherton responded. What an idiot. Wouldn’t want anyone to defend themselves against terrorists. And when the police arrive, the good guys are the ones that put their weapons down and stop shooting, not the ones that turn and shoot at the cops. And what makes this guy think, even if they did have time to ask who the good guys were,… Read more »

Capt Ed McCourt USMC (ret)

Check the laws, in the mid 1800’s congress realized , LEO’s could NOT secure and defend every citizen in their Area of responsibility.

Law Enforcement is just that., LEO’s enforce Laws after the fact , response! LAW Enforcement !! Security is an individual’s soul responsibility ! Due to lack of FUNDING and Man power, American’s can not expect their local / Federal LEO’s to defend us.

This country would be speaking with a British Accent if we didn’t protect ourselves back in the day!

God Bless American and the second amendment!

EFMc

Jim S

What a choice. Run, hide, tell. What a bunch of cowards. Stand up, be counted, do the right thing. I am so sorry for Britain.

Flatula

“…the five million members of the National Rifle Association…have a lower homicide rate than Britain.” That’s a fascinating stat, and one that I’d like to repeat loudly and often. But I’d like some attribution. Where, may I ask, did those figures come from?

Al

I moved to NJ six years ago and boy, what a major mistake. Shame on me for first not realizing this state has some of the highest taxes in the nation, more importantly, does not even have an inkling of care or concern, for the safety and protection of their law abiding residents. It is extremely easy for criminals to get and possess guns, but not for law abiding NJ residents. No right to carry in this State, even with Chris Christi our current republican governor or our new Republican governor candidate Kim Guadagno. Not only do you have to… Read more »

R. F. HORKA

I WAS IN LAW ENFORCEMENT AS A PROSECUTOR/ ELECTED DISTRICT ATTORNEY FOR 30 YRS AND YOU CAN’T DEPEND ON LEO TO PROTECT YOU OR YOURS, YOU MUST DO IT YOURSELF ARE TOLERATE BEING VICTIMS. LEOS ARE JUST AS PRONE TO MAKE MISTAKES AS CITIZENS, EVEN THOUGH THEY ARE GIVEN SOME TRAINING IN HANDLING AND USE OF WEAPONS THEY MAY NOT BE AS GOOD AS CITIZENS IN HANDLING THE MANY OCCASIONS WHEN CONFUSION, ADRENALINE, AND PAST EXPERIENCE CAN CONTROL. LEOS WILL ADMIT THAT WHEN THE CHASE ENDS GENERALLY SOMEBODY’S GOING TO PAY! WHEN I HAD TO REVIEW SAID CASES I REALIZED… Read more »

mwood

happy i do not live in an s-hole country that wants you to die instead of defending yourself

Jim palmer

I was raised with guns and hunting. Went to vietnam for two years and made life and death decision every day. I don’t need anyone trying to tell me about when to use my guns. government leave me and mine alone.