By Mark Oliva
USA – Sixteen of our nation’s senior military officers recently penned a letter to Congress under the banner of the Giffords Veteran Coalition.
They chose to lend their military authority and prestige to assist an ongoing political effort to further restrict their fellow law-abiding American citizens’ Constitutional right to keep and bear arms because they mistakenly believe they know how to reduce criminal misuse of firearms.
Generals and admirals, this is something that I just can’t salute.
The retired military leaders, who of course deserve accolades for leading forces in combat and humanitarian operations, cited the recent tragedy in Sutherland Springs, Texas, to call for more gun control laws. Unfortunately, they never mentioned that our nation’s military itself had the tools to prevent this tragedy from ever happening but failed tragically in that mission.
The Sutherland murderer had been convicted of domestic violence in a court-martial and involuntarily committed to a mental health facility before being booted from the Air Force with a bad conduct discharge.
At least two of these instances would have been enough to bar the murderer from buying a firearm. But the FBI’s National Instant Criminal Background Check System (NICS) was not informed of these facts because the Department of Defense never submitted the required disqualifying records. Because of DoD’s failure to follow its own regulations and our nation’s laws, this murderer was able to buy guns not just once, but four separate times. Each time he passed the background check.
Under the NICS Improvement Amendments Act of 2007, the military services were required to submit these records. The flag-level officers didn’t mention the DoD’s own instruction ordering compliance with the law. Nor was there mention of the Inspector General’s reports criticizing the military’s failure in its obligation to submit names of prohibited persons to the NICS database.
The generals and admirals tell Congress their command experience is foundational to their moral authority to call for restrictions on law-abiding American gun owners.
They didn’t tell Congress, though, that during the height of the fighting, while Army General Petraeus commanded Coalition forces, Iraqi families could keep a fully-automatic AK-47 and 30-round magazine in their homes.
U.S. forces didn’t want these families left defenseless against the terrorists who preyed on them.
This was the practice during my tour in Fallujah in 2006-2007. It was just one of several combat tours to Iraq and Afghanistan during my 25-year Marine Corps career. I trusted my life to their battlefield decision making. Yet, their letter wrongly blames the firearms, accessories and laws recognizing the fundamental right of Americans to keep and bear arms for the criminal activities of individuals.
There is a cognitive dissonance that these generals and admirals would seek restrictions on law-abiding Americans, who are only looking to make the best choice to protect themselves and their families. They never saw the same need in a nation under martial law with no Second Amendment rights. They advocate banning modern sporting rifles, the most popular rifle sold today. Nearly half of those who own these are former active and former military and law enforcement. They buy them primarily for target shooting, which follows a long history in the United States of service members in civilian life purchasing firearms similar to the rifle they used in uniform for lawful purposes like target shooting and hunting. Their opposition to this, and other measures, doesn’t pass muster.
Instead of endorsing new laws that criminals would not obey, the generals and admirals should devote their energy and commit their prestige to helping ensure that the laws already on the books are enforced. That includes keeping firearms out of the hands of prohibited persons by ensuring that disqualifying records are submitted to the system designed to help protect their fellow citizens. Sixteen retired generals and admirals do not speak for the overwhelming veteran population who know and treasure their Second Amendment rights.
About the Author
Mark Oliva is Manager, Public Affairs for the National Shooting Sports Foundation, the trade association for the firearms and ammunition and industries. He is a retired Marine Master Gunnery Sergeant with 25 years of service, including tours in Iraq, Afghanistan, Haiti, Albania and Zaire.
Gifford was not shot by a gun nut, she was shot by damned NUT!!!!! Shouldn’t have been loose on the street let alone able to purchase weapons. To hell with the gun part, a real nut with a can of gasoline could have really done damage. Don’t need guns, just ask the Islamic dipshit vehicular killers!!
Talk about “the anointed ones” mentality! Of course these are flag officers that came up under Obama. I think their “kiss Obama’s a**” is on autopilot
As a 32 year Veteran I can tell you that they in no way shape or form represent my opinions! I’m glad to see that there are no Senior Enlisted, O-6 and below or Warrant Officers among the names of shame. It appears that the men and women that do 99% percent of the work in the military don’t share these individuals beliefs.
Pretty much all flag rank officers cease to be warriors and become politicians. No surprise that they would have these opinions. It’s a shame that people who don’t know this would give the officer’s opinions the weight of fact. It’s no different than the opinions of entertainers that so many seem to value. A sad commentary on our society.
Based on my 29 year military-related life, senior officers are people who have lived ON Base since they were Captains, in a environment peopled by folks way up the socio-economic chart, where violence is work not play, and relative affluence and real power are theirs. They are much like Supreme Court justices, living in a safe glass bowl, totally divorced from the usual disorder of the life of ordinary civilians. They know not the streets of Anytown.
They are all traitors….all sixteen of them. This is no less than a conspiracy to compromise the US Constitution. All are deserving the hangman’s noose.
Why did you remove the names of the 16 military who penned the letter that were posted?
Probably all or mostly all of the 16 are Democrats? How about the Texas Church victims families/estates that will be suing the military/US Government for their failure to obey law and turn over the murdering dishonorably discharged shooters records to the NICS? They are in charge, they are responsible. Just more of the Left’s law breakers in high positions that want to take away our 2nd. Amendment rights.
It is as if these sixteen were completely unaware that we have a Constitution and Bill of Rights. Are they equally unaware that We the People are sovereign, that the government works for us, and that the military is merely a sub-division of that government?
These “commanders” are sadly representative of a military that has managed to LOSE most of the wars and military engagements (except Grenada) this country has waged in the past fifty years. Vietnam, Iraq, Afghanistan, the list goes on and on. They deserve to be “thanked” for their exemplary “service” to their country by being lined up against the nearest wall and shot. They’d be wise now to fade into the background, collect their huge, unearned pensions, AND KEEP THEIR GODDAMN MOUTHS SHUT!