NRA Files Suit Challenging Florida Gun Control Law

Lawsuit
NRA Files Suit Challenging Florida Gun Control Law

Fairfax, VA – -(Ammoland.com)- The National Rifle Association today announced that it has filed a lawsuit challenging the State of Florida’s newly-enacted ban on the purchase of firearms by young adults between the ages of 18-21.

Florida’s ban is an affront to the Second Amendment, as it totally eviscerates the right of law-abiding adults between the ages of 18 and 21 to keep and bear arms.

The ban is particularly offensive with respect to young women, as women between the ages of 18 and 21 are much less likely to engage in violent crime than older members of the general population who are unaffected by the ban. Despite this fact, the State of Florida has enacted a sweeping law banning all young adults between the ages of 18 and 21 from purchasing any firearm from any source.

Chris Cox, the Executive Director of the NRA’s Institute for Legislative Action, stated, “Swift action is needed to prevent young adults in Florida from being treated as second-class citizens when it comes to the right to keep and bear arms.

We are confident that the courts will vindicate our view that Florida’s ban is a blatant violation of the Second Amendment.” The case is National Rifle Association of America, Inc. v. Bondi, and it has been filed in the United States District Court for the Northern District of Florida.

National Rifle Association Institute For Legislative Action (NRA-ILA)

About:
Established in 1975, the Institute for Legislative Action (ILA) is the “lobbying” arm of the National Rifle Association of America. ILA is responsible for preserving the right of all law-abiding individuals in the legislative, political, and legal arenas, to purchase, possess and use firearms for legitimate purposes as guaranteed by the Second Amendment to the U.S. Constitution. Visit: www.nra.org

60 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Lee

This types of posts are not a great way to discuss or negotiate, but they are a way of exchanging ideas. From a Constitutional standpoint, ours gives us great latitude… and denies the right of the Government from completely disarming us. Gee… I wonder why they thought that was a good idea! It is. But it does not allow for unrestricted usage of firearms, and it is completely ignorant to bazookas, hand grenades, tanks and fighter jets. That is why those are not permitted at all for private ownership. Those are items that were not addressed in the Constitution, therefore,… Read more »

Docduracoat

They are not doing anything about the bump stock and binary trigger ban
I am joining Gun Owners of America

recon29

I was drafted. The old draft before the lottery. It was a great feeling knowing almost all of us would end up in Vietnam. Ok for killing but not allowed to vote or even buy a beer. Of course, on base, we could buy the 3.2 beer. Back then you weren’t considered an adult till you reach 21.(1967) I was in training until June 1968 when I went to Nam. On my 30 days leave before deployment I still couldn’t vote or buy a beer. I ended up extending in Nam after my first year there. Six months each time.… Read more »

Heed the Call-up

It appears more anti-rights people have found our site, based on posts to recent articles and commentary. Please note, pro-rights people will not be cowed by Lefstists, in the face of opposition, we stand strong. Many of us have stopped “turning the other cheek” and are making our voices heard.

Compromise is not an option any longer, time for the pro-rights suffrage movement. We need to vote out the anti-rights Leftists, make them pay at the ballot box.

Lee

Governments, and other municipalities, have always had some form of gun regulation and laws. Anarchy in defense, medical services, teaching, or any other segment of a group within a group has never resulted in anything good. Even our American Revolution had rules, regulations, and laws. The problems for us is when we refuse to let a Municipality issue any kind of regulation because then the gun haters (unfortunately there are many more of them!) see us as crazy. An 18 year old in the Army is under constant supervision. An 18 year old without a father or mother is not… Read more »

Green Mtn. Boy

The Negotiating Rights Away has a problem with the age of majority infringement but not the other infringements,I’m sure they will right the wrongs to the second amendment,Not.

1 2 3