Gun Owners Call BS on Restrictive Measures in New Jersey and Canada


I Will Not Comply Ban Guns
Gun Owners Call BS on Restrictive Measures in New Jersey and Canada

Fairfax, VA – -( Treating nice people like criminals isn’t likely to enhance respect for the law.

That’s a tough lesson anti-gun officials in New Jersey and Canada are learning now that deadlines are past or nearly arrived for certain newly-enacted gun control measures. Both localities are apparently experiencing widespread noncompliance with new requirements for firearm owners, despite provisions in the laws that threaten stiff punishment for those who don’t obey.

New Jersey gun owners faced a Dec. 10 2018 deadline for compliance with a state ban on magazines capable of holding more than 10 rounds. Residents in possession of formerly legal magazines had to surrender, destroy, transfer, or modify them or face felony penalties of up to 18 months in prison and a $10,000 fine. Opponents of the law had challenged it in court, but the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit denied the petition in a Dec. 5 ruling.

This led New Jersey’s Attorney General Gurbir Grewal to exalt on Twitter that the decision was a “[b]ig win for public safety and law enforcement safety!”

It’s hard to see how that could be so, however, given (among other things) that both enforcement officials and New Jersey residents seem content to simply ignore the dispossession mandate.

The New Jersey State Police answered a news outlet’s request to elaborate on how they would enforce the new magazine ban by referring the reporter to the Attorney General’s Office. That office, however, had no comment.

When pressed on specific possible enforcement scenarios, a public information officer at the attorney general’s office stated, “We’ve answered your query. … We have no comment.”

Governor Phil Murphy
NJ Governor Phil Murphy

Another writer on firearm-related issues was told by sources within the New Jersey State Police that they had received no guidance from the attorney general’s office on how to enforce the ban, nor did they have any current plans to investigate suspected violations.

That same writer attempted to determine whether any magazines had been surrendered by asking the governor’s office, the attorney general’s office, the state police, and several local police departments. In each case, the entity either refused to comment or reported that no magazines had been surrendered. The writer has since filed a Freedom of Information Act request with the state police and is awaiting a response.

A journalist for embarked on a similar exercise and was likewise unable to substantiate any magazines having been surrendered. As he pointed out, there are other possible means of complying with the law short of surrender, but there is no evidence those options are being used, either.

Thus, Garden State residents have either been discretely dealing with the matter personally or perhaps not dealing with it at all. With some one million estimated gun owners in New Jersey, it’s notable that not a single agency would confirm having received a surrendered magazine. Then again, this is perhaps not surprising, given that nobody knows how many non-compliant magazines remain in New Jersey or who might have them.

And it’s not just gun-loving Americans who are displaying skepticism toward newly-enacted gun control. Even some of our assiduously polite neighbors to the north may be thumbing their chilly noses at recent anti-gun mandates.

After the Canadian national government scrapped its failed long gun registry, the territory of Quebec enacted long gun registration requirements of its own that went into effect early in 2018. The territory’s public security minister improbably claimed at the time that the measure would “both prevent and solve crimes.”

Nearly a year later, and with penalties of up to $5,000 set to take effect later this month, the Montreal Gazette is reporting that less than 18% of the guns estimated to be covered by the law have been registered.

According to that article: “The government has put the number of long guns — mostly shotguns and rifles — in Quebec at roughly 1.6 million. But since the registry opened last January, only 284,125 guns had been declared, Public Security Department spokeswoman Louise Quintin said.”

Ironically, a supporter of the Quebec registry told the Gazette that the registry “is essential because guns cannot be controlled if the government doesn’t know how many there are and where they are.”

What the backers of the measure fail to appreciate, however, is that the registry itself is unenforceable for exactly the same reasons.

This fact, on the other hand, doesn’t seem to have escaped over 80% of the territory’s already overly-burdened long gun owners.

Only time will tell if New Jersey and Quebec will try to back up the dubious and high-minded public safety rhetoric that accompanied the enactment of these gun control laws with enforcement action against otherwise law-abiding residents.

In the meantime, it may not just be an appreciation for hockey that unites New Jerseyans and Québécoises, but antipathy for overreaching and silly gun control as well.

National Rifle Association Institute For Legislative Action (NRA-ILA)

Established in 1975, the Institute for Legislative Action (ILA) is the “lobbying” arm of the National Rifle Association of America. ILA is responsible for preserving the right of all law-abiding individuals in the legislative, political, and legal arenas, to purchase, possess and use firearms for legitimate purposes as guaranteed by the Second Amendment to the U.S. Constitution. Visit:

Most Voted
Newest Oldest
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Jerry S.

This not just a state and northern country problem folks. The shift in Congress to the Democrats will bring a flurry of gun proposals, all bad for legal owners. If the RINO’s start caving to save their political careers, we will only have the President to stop them. One must realize that if enough compromise with the Dems, they will be able to override any veto’s he issues. This is a bell-weather moment for the 2nd Amendment, mark my words. We are on the precipice of total confiscation if it continues and we all know that will not go well… Read more »

Jim Title 18, U.S.C., Section 241 Conspiracy Against Rights This statute makes it unlawful for two or more persons to conspire to injure, oppress, threaten, or intimidate any person of any state, territory or district in the free exercise or enjoyment of any right or privilege secured to him/her by the Constitution or the laws of the United States, (or because of his/her having exercised the same). It further makes it unlawful for two or more persons to go in disguise on the highway or on the premises of another with the intent to prevent or hinder his/her free exercise… Read more »

B Allen

Here is a letter sent to the Minister responsible for introducing further Canadian firearms laws , with published comments from the RCMP Commissioner, the former Chief of Ontario’s Provincial Police, plus others. This letter pretty well sums up the position of most firearms owners in Canada on this proposed legislation. This bill C-71 is Federal and over and above Quebec’s present fiasco which is completely illegal simply because firearms are under Federal NOT Provincial Jurisdiction. 20 days before the cut off date for compliance, I would say the figure for complience with the Quebec ‘law’ is probably, being liberal, (… Read more »


So what are these politicians in Canada and New Jersey going to do? Arrest 1000’s of white middle class gun owners? Dont they have overcrowding in prisons now? And say isn’t new Jersey the headquarters of the Mafia? A lot of good their commie gun laws do. I’ll bet that these New jersey politicians have mob figures for friends and supporters!

Darrell M.

When the Demon-Rats abolish sanctuary State, City, County laws and positions and follow federal immigration laws.
Then maybe we will “consider/take under advisement” their gun ban suggestions (when unconstitutional, they are not laws). When politicians do not follow the laws that they took an oath to uphold. The laws they produce and put upon the people must be resisted and ignored.

Wayne Clark

No WE won’t! There will be NO consideration of gun ban “suggestions” or otherwise, taken. You don’t reward illegalities with more illegal concessions. Your “suggested” reasoning is what needs to be resisted & ignored.


Revise your comment and write full sentences! I don’t believe you wrote what you have tried to say!

grim reaper

It doesn’t matter if they enforce it or not. Being on the books allows them to pick you off one by one if your caught with a over capacity magazine or hollow point bullet. The tool is then there to prosecute the innocent and unsuspecting.


Being on the books with or for what? Magazines aren’t registered or recorded so how would anyone know what you have? A NJ resident could simply drive to a gun store or gun show in PA, stock up on 30 round magazines and drive home. Same with ammo. Oh wait, that would be against NJ law……my bad……strike that, I’m sure no NJ resident would EVER consider doing that!


Magazines in and of themselves, no….what about registration of firearms. A Glock 22, or 21 or 45 models, all carry high capacity magazines, (more than allowed under this law anyway), for example; a simple query of these firearms in NJ data base would reveal who owns what based upon ones own registration. Is it so far fetched that a knock on the door is forthcoming someday in the immediate or not so distant future, whereby citizens are now compelled to carry the burden of proof, (with credible and convincing evidence), as to where their magazines/weapon(s) as registered are? Since it… Read more »

Bob Percopo

The NRA needs to focus on getting gun owners rights issues to the Supreme Court to get second amendment issues resolved before there are no 2nd amendment rights Get off the stick and trade background checks ( ska Manchin-Toomey) for National reciprocity

Wayne Clark

Our rights are not a bargaining chip…no matter the “prize”! You & Darrell M must be related.


The same result will be seen with the bump stock ban!


Claim the mag is for 458 Socom and only holds 10 rds

A. White

…and the USSofMD!


poor unconstitutional d-suckers, i’m sure your efforts to disarm the law-abiding will continue