Opinion By Larry Keane
USA – -(AmmoLand.com)- Democratic hopefuls squared off in the first primary debate over two days and they had plenty to say about the gun control plans they would enact if elected. Perhaps the most important take away from the two nights is that the candidates advocated or passively supported gun confiscation, rhetorically couched as “gun buybacks.”
Not a single one of the 20 candidates spoke in opposition to confiscation or the respect for the Second Amendment. So, the Democrats really are coming for your guns. The other key takeaway is that former Vice President Joe Biden believes the firearm industry is the “enemy.”
In addition, nearly all candidates embrace a ban on modern sporting rifles and standard capacity magazines and instituting universal background checks. Biden would mandate that all firearms sold be equipped with unreliable biometric authorized user recognition technology, sometimes called “smart guns.” Let’s recap what the candidates had to say about infringing on the Second Amendment. –
DEBATE PART I
Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.): equated crimes with firearms to a health crisis, calling it a ‘national health emergency,” but ducked answering whether she supports confiscation proposals.
Sen. Cory Booker (D-N.J.) said, “I hear gunshots in my neighborhood,” and proposed a national licensing program, requiring training standards. Sen. Booker also wants to restrict handguns sales to once per month. He claimed to MSNBC that the majority of Americans agree with his plans to require licensing and training standards to exercise American rights.
Sen. Amy Klobuchar (D-Minn.) tried to convince debate viewers that a forced buyback scheme to collect the more than 16 million privately-owned modern sporting rifles isn’t confiscation as long as the government makes an “offer.”
New York City Mayor Bill de Blasio portrayed gun control as a race issue, invoking his biracial son and quickly pivoted to policing.
Secretary Julian Castro (D-Texas), former Secretary of Housing and Urban Development, predicted a Democratic sweep of The White House and Congress, ushering in unprecedented gun control. He’s previously said there would be no handguns in an ideal world.
Former U.S. Rep. Robert “Beto” O’Rourke (D-Texas), called modern sporting rifles “weapons of war” that “belong on the battlefield and not in our communities.”
Rep. Tim Ryan (D-Ohio) steered clear of committing to gun control on the stage, referring to changes in mental health care instead. Ryan was once a Lifetime NRA member, but has since embraced gun control platforms and even donated $20,000 of NRA contributions to gun control groups.
Former U.S. Rep. John Delaney (D-Md.) didn’t get to directly answer questions on gun control other than to say solutions must be reached in a bipartisan manner. However, Rep. Delaney cosponsored legislation to ban modern sporting rifles and standard capacity magazines and would criminalize private firearms transfers.
Rep. Tulsi Gabbard (D-Hawaii) spoke on military arms on the debate stage, but didn’t offer her previous stance on the issues, where she’s supported banning modern sporting rifles, standard capacity magazines and implementing universal background checks.
Washington Gov. Jay Inslee also struggled to be heard, getting just five minutes of speaking time, the least of anyone on the stage the night he debated. However, Gov. Inslee is a strident gun control supporter who voted for the Assault Weapons Ban of 1994 when he served in Congress and supports the recent gun control initiatives passed in Washington by ballot initiative.
DEBATE PART II
Rep. Eric Swalwell (D-Calif.) answered the first question on guns, promoting his mass confiscation program, which even the moderators refused to acknowledge was a confiscation, labeling it, instead, as a “buyback.” Swalwell said Americans would be allowed to keep pistols, rifles and shotguns.
Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.) defended a previous position that states should decide gun laws and pivoted to his support for universal background checks and claimed so-called “assault weapons” are from the military, refusing to understand the modern sporting rifles as designed in the 1950s as a sporting rifle and sold by Colt as such before being adopted by the military and converted to the M-16.
Sen. Kamala Harris (D-Calif.) reiterated her demand for legislation within 100 days if elected and threatened executive action to ban modern sporting rifle imports. She also said “guns” would be priority for a Harris administration.
Mayor Pete Buttegieg (D-Ind.) blamed guns for the crime problems in America, saying they make Americans less safe. He called modern sporting rifles “weapons of war” and wants universal background checks.
Former Vice President Joe Biden (D-Del.) said gun manufacturers were the enemy, adding he would conduct a modern sporting rifle confiscation under the guise of a “buyback” and require all firearms sold to be equipped with so-called “smart-gun” or authorized-user technology that does not exist in a reliable form.
Sen. Kirsten Gillibrand (D-N.Y.) said crimes committed with firearms were the fault of “greed” by gun manufacturers.
Sen. Michael Bennet (D-Colo.) didn’t speak on guns from the debate stage but has a mixed record on gun rights. He voted for a ban on standard capacity magazines, but also said he opposes on restrictions on the right to keep and bear arms.
John Hickenlooper (D-Colo.) touted his passage of universal background checks in Colorado while governor, but didn’t mention the ban on standard capacity magazines that caused Magpul to leave the state. Gov. Hickenlooper has put forth a national gun license requirement proposal, enacting age-based gun bans and banning modern sporting rifles.
Andrew Yang (D-N.Y.) didn’t speak on guns from the debate stage, but has proposed a tiered national gun licensing scheme, bans on suppressors, standard capacity magazines and implement age-based gun bans.
Marianne Williamson (D-Calif.) also didn’t speak on guns, but does support a ban on all semiautomatic firearms, standard capacity magazines, universal background checks and mandatory waiting periods for firearms purchases.
Whoever is ultimately nominated by the Democratic Party, there will be stark contrast between the Democrat candidate and President Donald Trump on the Second Amendment. The issue could very well determine the outcome of the election and the future existence of our industry.
About NSSF
The National Shooting Sports Foundation is the trade association for the firearms industry. Its mission is to promote, protect and preserve hunting and the shooting sports. Formed in 1961, NSSF has a membership of thousands of manufacturers, distributors, firearms retailers, shooting ranges, sportsmen’s organizations and publishers nationwide. For more information, visit nssf.org.
Here’s an example of California’s requirement for BGC on ammo that began today that will only apply to law abiding citizens. People turned out to buy ammo before it became a gun control registration scheme that’ll track who has what and by caliber.
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/us/a-win-for-public-safety-or-a-government-ploy-california-set-to-require-background-check-for-ammo-sales/ar-AADEx8t?ocid=spartandhp
I’ll bet a 50 round box of .22 ammo there was an uptick in gun, ammo and anything gun related sales after these anti-gunners laid out their gun control agendas for all to see.
Sales of many things are driven by fear. This is not necessarily a bad thing.
IMOA I don’t believe people are driven by fear to buy guns, ammo and anything gun related when anti-gunners start with their anti-gun rhetoric, but the free will of people who do not like anyone telling them what they can buy, when they can buy it or if you have one it’ll be taken from them.
Oh, okay. LOL.
When the .gov says you don’t need a gun, or you don’t need ammo, then you now that’s when you need to stock up on both. CA saw a massive increase in ammo purchases as soon as the law passed. Rewind to 2013 when they started requiring registration of all rifles purchased (like handguns). Sales of all rifles skyrocketed. It’s none of the .gov’s business what I own, and how many or how much.
Even liberals here say when the gov says you don’t need an AR-15 you need an AR-15 and if liberals are smart enough to figure this out then,,,,,,,,, we’ll you know.
Nah, not here. When Obama got elected, yes. Sales skyrocketed and every house outside of the city was outside practicing for weeks then the moment he got sworn in all gun fire stopped and it went silent. Now that every house is heavily armed to the teeth from Obama Presidency there is no need to buy more. When Trump said take guns, due process later heavy gun fire from every house for weeks broke out then the day Red Flag was signed into law all went silent. I say everybody is heavily armed due to all of them and I… Read more »
Enemy’s of the USA campaigning for Trump. Solidifying his victory a year + before the actual election. At this rate Trump will be able to stay home and still win. One look at the traitors who should be in front of a firing squad for the good of civilization and you can see that they do actually eat their own. They are obamanation. Death to all living things including bacteria. They must be eradicated for humanity to survive. Boiling pit of sulfur is burning hot waiting for thier arrival.
I’m a proud Montana boy born and raised 5th generation. The 2nd Amendment is a right not a privilege. If these people want my guns they need to bring theirs. If we stand on the bill of rights, then they have to break the law to take these rights away from us. That is unless we vote them in and let them. DON’T BE FOOLED. Socialism is the early stages of a cancer called communism.
For 24 years I have felt that “The Turner Diaries” should be required reading for Highschool graduation.
Gun manufacturers and gun owners are enemies of the totalitarian government the yearn for, which they believe they will control.
Yes, their New World Order as Bush stated the same New World Order we didn’t want from Obama but were still going to get with Trump aka total tyranny.
They are All members of the POLITBURO.iF YOU KNOW where that comes from good If you don’t know, LOOK IT UP. And you are willing to elect one of these.
Sic semper tyrannis
One other thing, one of the dummies said that illegals could not be bound by our laws because they are not citizens.
I actually watched the debate. It was quite entertaining and even funny at times. It reminded me of a mock debate when I was in the 8th grade. I loved the part when Bato Dumbo said he does not believe in capitol business but was to tax companies 70 percent to pay for everything or when Julian Castro who actually worked in the obama admin said he believed that men has the right to an abortion just as women did and the government should pay for it. The best part was when the left wing media declared Kamala Harris the… Read more »
To be a candidate for the Democrat-National Socialist-Communist Nomination for POTUS requires that one have rat excrement for brains. These dumb ass liberals might well be the tyrants Jefferson had in mind when he said that the tree of liberty must be watered with the blood of tyrants and martyrs as it the manure upon which a free republic grows. SIC SEMPER TYRANNIS!!!
For what these people are doing to our country with illegal immigrants entering uncontrolled, ridiculous so called common sense gun laws, and for trying to force their socialist ideas upon us, they should all be charged with treason and HUNG. And make damn sure Eric Swallows is the first one to swing!!!!!!!
Anti-Constitutionalist’s=Anti-Americans=Enemies of the United States…
These people are out of touch with our nation and it’s founding and history. But I’m beginning to lose faith in Trump on guns also. I worry that none of them see the Bill of Rights as untouchable.
“Come and take them”; I’m waiting for you to try! It will be over your dead body that I will stand.
I am a major in the army of the Republic of Texas, San Jacinto company. I have roughly 135 at my command, all volunteers. Under command of the lieutenant Governor. “Come and take it” was the rallying cry at Goliad which was the spark of the Texas rebellion against the Mexican tyranny. “Foreign and DOMESTIC” was not added just for the hell of it. It was an addition to “cover your ass”. For everyone’s benefit. Politicians forget that the federal government was designed to run in the background and state government in the in the foreground, not the other way… Read more »
Notice how all of these idiots refuse to put any responsibility on peoples actions, but rather vilify the 2nd Amendment, gun manufacturers, and weapons themselves.
Just a bunch of brain dead Leftards on parade,trying ever so hard to out Bernie the Burnmeister,best thing about it was the chuckle factor was high.
It would appear that the Leftard party wants very badly to see Donald Trump reelected,because the more they espouse their views the more any thinking/reasoning person is going to vote for Trump.At the rate the Demorats are going it should be a landslide victory for president Trump.
I consider each of the Dem candidates enemies.
@Liberty, Every one of them said that they would give illegal aliens free and complete health care … preferring illegal aliens to middle class Americans. Every disease known to man will be heading straight to the US, and looking for a Border Patrolman to turn themselves into. Every country in the world will be emptying out their hospitals and insane asylums and transporting those people here.
The national socialist democrats … enemies … oh yeah.
Enemies and traitors pre-confessing their guilt that should earn them a free trip to the gallows.
Nothing like tainting the jury pool in favor of the American Patriot. Swing, bitches!
America’s enemies are you, dhimmi-rat d-suckers