WILMINGTON, DE –-(Ammoland.com)- When Hallie Biden threw Hunter Biden’s handgun away in a trash can behind a grocery store, Politico reported that the Secret Service intervened and retrieved the .38 Spl revolver. The Secret Service denied having any involvement in the incident. AmmoLand News has recovered iPhone text messages from Hunter Biden’s laptop that contradicts the Secret Service’s story.
In October 2018, the former daughter-in-law of President Joe Biden removed the handgun from Hunter Biden’s truck and disposed of it in a trash can behind the local Janssen’s Market in Wilmington. She later returned to the scene only to find out that the firearm was gone. Hallie Biden notified the store manager of the lost firearm. The manager told Delaware police, and they began an investigation into the missing gun. The police were concerned about the proximity to a local high school and worried the now lost gun would be used in a crime.
An older man, sorting through trash, found Hunter’s firearm in the trash can before Halie Biden returned. The man was looking in the trash for recyclable materials. He turned in the gun to the police later that day.
The incident did not result in any charges against Halie Biden or Hunter Biden!
Garret Ziegler and the Marco Polo Research Group at www.marcopolousa.org continue to report on the alleged Hunter Biden gun crimes.
Hallie Biden claimed that she was worried about Hunter Biden’s mental health and thought he might hurt himself because of his drug use, and was afraid for her kids.
It is worth noting that Delaware Red Flag Law was signed in 2018. Hallie Biden could have red-flagged Hunter Biden under the state’s law.
At the time, Hunter Biden was being investigated for tax issues. He also was experiencing marital problems that would eventually lead to a messy divorce. His history of substance abuse has been widely documented.
According to reporting, the Secret Service went to the gun shop that sold Biden his firearm and requested the 4473-form filled out and signed (embedded below) by the former Vice President’s son. The gun store owner refused to turn over the documents to the people claiming to be Secret Service. However, the next day the same gun store would turn over the records to the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and Explosives (ATF).
The Secret Service released a statement denying any involvement in the incident. At the time, the younger Biden didn’t have Secret Service protection. Joe Biden said he was unaware of any actions of the Secret Service. In a subsequent FOIA request by AmmoLand News’ David Codrea, the Secret Service said it could not find any record of its involvement.
“U.S. Secret Service records confirm that the agency did not provide protection to any member of the Biden family in 2018 and that the Secret Service had no involvement in this alleged incident,” the agency said in a statement released to the media.
But… Hunter Biden’s Laptop Tells a Different Story
Hunter Biden’s Text messages paint a much different picture than the Secret Service’s claim. The text messages between Hunter Biden, Hallie Biden, and Dr. Keith Ablow show that Hunter Biden claimed that both the Secret Service and the FBI were involved in getting back the handgun. Dr. Ablow is a former psychiatrist and frequent TV pundit for FoxNews and The Blaze.
Either The Secret Service or Hunter Biden is lying which is it?
Since the text conversation, Dr. Ablow has been accused of sexual assault and harassment. In 2020, Dr. Ablow’s home was raided by the DEA. He allegedly asked employees to share medication with him after his license was revoked.
AmmoLand News will continue to keep investigating the incident and the Secret Service involvement.
Hunter Biden’s Handgun Purchase 4473 Singed and Dated 10-12-18
About John Crump
John is a NRA instructor and a constitutional activist. John has written about firearms, interviewed people of all walks of life, and on the Constitution. John lives in Northern Virginia with his wife and sons and can be followed on Twitter at @crumpyss, or at www.crumpy.com.
Congratulations, John. You are now a superior reporter to anyone on CNN or MSNBC. Next stop, Project Veritas!
I don’t know, brother. You know the golden rule. Them’s who got the gold … makes the rules.
Bad cop: Will (“TEX”): “Listen you sick little son of a bitch…”
Good cop (Wild Bill): “I don’t know, brother. You know the golden rule. (blah blah blah)”.
Translation: Crickets Chirping
Brother = AGENT = sock puppet
He could commit murder and they would find a way to make it self defense. Or just plain cover it up.
just look at buffalo NY mayor Brown. He did a drunk hit and run that killed a woman 1-2 years ago and he was reelected as mayor
Gotta tell ya’ll. The preceeding drivel on this side of Neptune, is the BS that makes every Patriot cringe. Most all of you, with the possible exception of Patriot Solutions, and I am not sure for sure in this case, are acting like six grade boys smoking their first cigs behind the barn and dreaming of that first poontang they most never will get. sad….
Not surprised, but how?
“Hunter is just a privileged little pissant who’s day will come.”
LOL, suck-up TEXAN says pissant, can’t spell whose.
Naaa, my spell check does that all the time. If I type w h o s and then hesitate before typing e, the spell check converts it to who’s lightening quick. I used to not notice and it would get by me. Now, I know to keep an eye on the spell check.
If you want maddening; my tablet uses Grammarly, yet for some reason autocorrect won’t stay turned off. Often as I’m typing the two get into a war on which one should get to correct a simple mistake. By the time I catch on what’s happening, my previous sentence looks like I wrote it in Polish. One of them even like to start changing things once you hit send.
Who do you think you’re kidding? Will acts like a foul mouth low-IQ ex-enforcer thug here all the time. Why do you cover for him? Alter ego sock puppet, or just pure hypocrisy?
My theory is as supported by evidence as yours is. Stop creating hateful scenarios in you head and spewing them as if they were fact. Always with the negative waves, Moriarity!
There you go with that enforcement of civility against one group, but not another.
Enforcement?
Sure – you attempt to enforce a lop-sided view of civility on one group of people by making comments like the ones in this thread.
You keep deflecting when I comment on your decision to be extremely selective in your enforcement attempts.
It is not enforcement. The root of enforcement is force. I have no force to bring to bear. Enforcement is a mischaracterization. I am merely expressing my opinion.
Nice projection, Hypocrite.
To quote you, “… bla, bla, bla.”
To quote you …
Oh, how witty. I am stunned.
You are blinded by your hate. You pick people on line to issue a ration of crap to because if you did it in person on the street, you would get stomped into a mud hole.
You write poison, here, because here you are safe.
Oooh, implied threats. Watch out, your inner WILL’s coming out.
I don’t hate you. I’m just on to your BS.
Nice to see you come out of the closet, AGENT.
I implied nothing. You inferred a threat. It is my opinion that if you spoke to people in public the way that you write to people here, you would get beat up … regularly. I further opine that you choose people to hate here because it is safe.
My BS is all in your own mind.
Were you drunk when you replied? You MIGHT make more sense if you stay away from the bottle.
Nice projection, Genius. Did Will let you off lap dance duty?
Boys, boys, boys, that is why you read your comments before hitting enter. So much vitriol from you guys. Put a little love in your heart.
No thanks on the Rodney King. Tell it to foul-mouth thug-talker Will and all the Agents and sock puppets who dv everything I and a few others post who aren’t mindless cop-worshipers. I offered a truce and it was immediately shat upon. Payback is fair play.
He sells bottled vitriol from the back of a medicine show wagon.
What are your thoughts about the people who call others “smart asses,” “jerks,” “assholes,” “morons,” “bastards,” “pissants,” “sons-of-bitches,” etc.? What are your thoughts on Will lamenting that he is no longer an enforcer, but if he was, he would give a months pay to be able to pull me over for a broken tail light and then use dumb cop tricks in an attempt to escalate the situation into a scenario which he incorrectly believed would allow him to shoot me without legal repercussions? It’s not the lack of civility you dislike – it’s the difference of opinion. You have… Read more »
There was a two year period, more or less, that I could not access ammoland because my computer was so old, and I spent my computer money on a Christianson Arms Ridgeline in 6.5 PRC, and a 1200 yard rifle range, so I don’t believe that I read any of those alleged comments.
There are too many state, county, and city/town police for me to be familiar with but only one Fat Boy Institute and one BATFEces.
The comments have been written (and quoted) since your return. Some of them during the last two days.
Being disingenuous is not clever, it’s just disingenuous and it’s not a good look for you.
You are also well aware of countless state, county, and city/town enforcers enforcing gun laws that are even more onerous than federal laws.
Ask “Don” if he would enforce a law banning semiautomatic rifles when he was a Washington state highway patrol officer (he has already acknowledged he would enforce laws requiring such rifles to be registered).
What was the date of my return, again?
There you go again.
There are plenty of examples over the last four weeks.
Hey, “There you go, again.” That is a Ronald Reagan quote. I always knew that you were well read.
Yes, Reagan had some good speeches, good comedic timing, and could win people over with his charm.
He fell a little short on the execution of some “conservative” ideas, but I still enjoy listening to him.
His library is worth 6 to 8 hours if you are ever out that way.
You know, just to establish the timeline, as long as you purport to know.
Not a good look?! You should see me in person!
You had an opportunity.
You think that is funny, you should see my pittie when I pick him up. I think that he enjoys the rough and tumble. We are calling him Winston because he has jowles like Winston Churchill.
Will (“TEX”) – 11/18/21
“WB,that is hilarious!”
Reply to Will (“TEX”):
Wanting to murder someone by using the authority entrusted to you as a government employee is something for which you should feel ashamed.
Using profanity or vulgar language is neither here nor there with me, but when you use it and then attribute it to someone else as soon as the opportunity arrives (by taking advantage of someone who is a bit . . . confused) is low class.
Will (“TEX”): “Listen you sick little son of a bitch. I’m about to introduce you to the world of libel/slander. Stay away!” Reply to Will (“TEX”): Well, that would be interesting, now wouldn’t it, Will? My legal team vs yours. My team would look at my quotes of what you have written over the last year and then subpoena Ammoland for the actual posts (you don’t really think they go away, do you?). The jury would look at your posts and would not at all be fooled by your clumsy innuendo. Of course, even your lawyer would throw away “slander”… Read more »
We are about to go to war with China. Inflation is 6.2 percent per month. A communist who wants to do away with private bank accounts is about to become comptroller of the currency. America is now a land of shortages of every commodity. This youngster is the least of your (our) worries. He is not even on the radar.
The fact that he is annoyed with us is pure flattery.
Young people are alway full of opinions with no real experience.
Now there is flattery.
Thank you for referring to me as a “young person.”
Non-government employees don’t typically throw around their “creds” like government employees do.
Pssst, Will – he’s trying to tell you to save your money. Wild Bill is not dumb, you should listen to him (he’s not dumb – he just plays to the audience).
Some people have accomplishments and accreditation that they are proud of. Some don’t.
Some of those accomplished people have no need to drop their creds as some type of validation.
People who accomplish are proud of their accomplishments. Some people just hide behind a “…no nee to drop their creds as some type of validation.” argument. But they really have not done anything or been where the action was.
Why, Wild Bill, are you attempting to taunt me into providing information that could be used to cancel me?
I’m comfortable.
An accomplished person has credibility. Non-achievers have little credibility.
Who is a non-achiever?
Many people. What have you done?
Now, there you go again. When you act so clumsily, I start thinking Russin8r may have a theory worth exploring (that you and Will are one in the same). He’s been right about many things. Stating what I have done would assist the many authoritarian statists in canceling me. Why would I want to provide that information? Far better to state what I am. I am an unapologetic capitalist who believes in a smaller, better government, far less forced wealth redistribution, numerous policies aimed at reducing the number of people living in the U.S. illegally, a stop to never-ending gun… Read more »
He is a hater, and if he treated people on the street the way he treats people here, then he would get thrashed.
As for you, I can not disagree with what you have written immediately above, you have yet to state what you are.
I stated what I am. I’m not going to state what I have done, for obvious reasons. Again, you pretend not to know something you know. Russian8r has his own style, but I have not heard him lament not still having government authority so he could murder someone. I have not seen him use the words I have quoted others as using. If you have such strong opinions of him, why do you not have strong opinions of others? If you agree with what my beliefs are, you may want to ask him what his beliefs are – I suspect… Read more »
What am I pretending not to know.
Your reasons are obvious, alright. You have accomplished nothing. So why would anyone listen to you?
Now, see – there is another incorrect conclusion to which you have jumped.
You pretend not to know why I won’t answer your question about what I have done. You knew the answer before I responded and when I did respond, you pretended not to know. Why do you do this – it makes you look bad.
He is just rude that is hardly a style.
Yep, Heckle and Jeckle. One lies and the other swears to it.
Now, that’s not very nice.
Whatever do you mean not very nice? Let’s not write in tepid riddles.
That’s not a riddle – you know that.
You either indicated I am a liar or I swear to what a liar said.
No, no. Are you not familiar with Heckle and Jeckle? That phrase goes along with Heckle and Jeckle. Are you sure that you are not a young person.
You don’t know Heckle and Jeckle and you have no achievements to write of? I think that you are a young person.
Your evidence is thin, counselor (and leading you to an incorrect belief, again).
Why do you insist I have no achievements to write of just because I choose to not write of them?
You knew the reason I don’t write of them before you even broached the question.
I don’t believe you because few achieve, many just opine. So the odds are in my favor.
You say that I have an incorrect belief, so improve me. You must have some achievement that would make you credible, yet preserve your anonymity.
You are becoming obsessed.
It’s not healthy.
Obsessed? Don’t flatter yourself. I’m just practicing my typing.
Really? Nothing? Never dressed a deer … shoed a horse … stripped, cleaned and reassembled an M60 … not even stirred a burning drum of your platoon’s excrement. Figures.
Will (“TEX”) – 11/18/21:
“WB,their only claim to fame is being both halves of “Frick and Frack” ! Just our resident clowns on AMMOLAND,for now! TEX”
So?
Can you be more specific?
You answer by quoting another without stating why that quote is relevant. So what are you trying to say. in short … so?
Oh, I see the assumption you made.
I was not answering you by quoting Will.
I was just quoting Will for posterity.
My apologies for not making that clear.
Accepted.
Good night.
Ahh, to sleep, perchance to dream of warm approval and admiration of his peers in lieu of the real thing.
Hmmm. The silence of the grave. Please, please tell me that you have done something in your life even if it is just commercial self enrichment, lacking in anything that could be called courageous, bold, intrepid, or honorable.
You know, if you keep stroking that self-glorification, it will only end in bitterness.
You are only slightly less blunt than a few others with the same message. It destroys a lot of goodwill that many good people who preceded you created.
Also, while I enjoy humor, it’s a poor interpretation of Colonel Nathan R. Jessep.
Non-achievement and lack of credibility will lead to poverty, jealousy, and lesions.
One says that I am coy the other says that I am blunt. Heckle and Jeckle. Frick and Frack.
I thought that it a witty, apropos, and well timed paraphrase.
Like I said, I’m comfortable (because of my accomplishments). Just because I don’t brag about my situation, doesn’t mean I’m in poverty.
You seem to mistake jealousy (I believe you mean envy) for my concern regarding a totalitarian government buying people to do their bidding.
No, to both ginned up falsehoods.
You are right. Some old people just remained immature.
Immature, or have convictions in their beliefs which differ from yours?
Immature.
I beg to differ, sir.
You choose to pretend you do not know things. I do not choose to do so.
Don’t beg. It is unprepossessing. Just tell us one thing that you have accomplished that would give you some credibility. Just one little reason that we should pay attention to you.
Why would my accomplishments lend credibility to my comments on Ammoland?
You don’t need to pay attention to me or any other person who has not listed their accomplishments.
Why do you frequently use “we” – is it a royal “we,” are you part of an agency, does it refer to you and Will, or do you have a mouse in your pocket?
That is correct I( nor anyone else) need pay attention to you including your defense of the rude one because you have nothing to show that you may know what you are writing about. What a pity.
Others are coy, highly developed sickos who get off on playing good cop/bad cop with poopy mouth thugs who may or may not be their sock pups.
What is your definition of “sickos”.
Well aren’t you coy?
Nope, but you are consumed by the need to have enemies, from a safe distance.
Bad cop: Will (“TEX”): “Listen you sick little son of a bitch…”
Good cop: Wild Bill: “We’re about to go to war with China (blah blah blah)”.
Translation: Crickets Chirping
Baghdag Bob saw more wrong doing on his side than Wild Bill.
Wild Bill is a fraud.
You are just trying to get me to write some insulting remark that would bring me down to your level.
Yours is the level of the scumbags you protect.
I don’t know.
He’s not Will.
On the other hand, I’ve never worked with a lawyer who struggled with lose/loose and effect/affect as much as Wild Bill.
I don’t normally point it out (I have made dozens of spelling and grammar errors here) – I’m just sayin’.
He also makes some odd leaps to judgment – first saying that I’m really The Revelator (because of my writing style and because “others,” meaning just Will, said so) and then somehow concluding I’m “young.”
How do you know he’s not Will? Have you met them?
I suppose he could be Will’s monkey grinder.
In any case, he covers for Will, even praises him, calls him brother.
Well, I don’t know for an absolute fact, of course.
Wild Bill is not dumb – he just plays to the audience. Easy enough to do here (just pretend you don’t know things).
Will on the other hand . . .
It seems unlikely that an above average IQ person could live with himself by pretending to be somebody so different.
Wouldn’t be hard to anonymously play the part of the chimp whose organ he’s grinding, including praising him, giving him peanuts for operant conditioning,
Surely you don’t make the mistake of imputing your honor to AGENTS & potty-mouth thug ex(?)-enforcers.
I’m just saying it seems like it would be hard for the person who Wild Bill seems to be to adopt the persona of a character who writes like Will.
Like I said, I don’t know.
Key word “seems to be”. Plus, it’s anonymous, and he’s about the coyest fellow on Ammoland.
Who?
Surely, you remember referring to me as “Rev” after Will (“TEX”) insisted I was that other poster.
What point are you trying to make?
Only that you incorrectly concluded that I was someone else based on your analysis of my writing and the opinion of one other person (and you falsely attributed those opinions to “others” when there was only one).
One makes an analysis based on available data, forms a theory, and at some point the theory has to be tested. It is the scientific method.
Hmmm, but fabricating inputs is not part of the process.
The one you’re trying to evade.
Can’t stop fellating yourself, can you WillTEX?
De nada, senior!
You sell bottles of hypocrisy, Will