
WASHINGTON, D.C. -(Ammoland.com)- The United States House of Representatives has passed the “Bipartisan Safer Communities Act” (S.2938).
The bill originated in the US Senate by a group of ten Republicans led by Texas Senator John Cornyn and ten Democrats led by Connecticut Senator Chris Murphy. All Democrats in the Senate voted for the gun control bill. Fifteen Republicans crossed party lines to back the bill blocking a filibuster and sending S2938 to the House of Representatives for approval.
Nancy Pelosi’s House swiftly passed the bill and sent it to President Biden’s desk for his signature. Once the President signs the bill, the act will become law.
This act is the most significant gun control measure passed by Congress since the 1990s. Anti-gun groups celebrated the gun control victory.
Almost all gun rights groups opposed the bill even though John Cornyn claimed to have worked with gun rights groups. The bill has several provisions that these groups claim violate America’s Second Amendment rights, the equal protection clause, and the due process clause of the Constitution.
The first trouble section of the bill will provide funding for states to enact already proven deadly “red flag” laws. The laws allow the police to remove firearms from the homes of people they believe to be a threat to themselves or others. Red flag laws are also known as extreme risk protection orders (ERPO). Some gun rights groups refer to these orders as gun confiscation orders.
A judge signs these orders in secret, and the gun owner doesn’t have the ability to defend themselves in a court of law or even know about the hearing until the police raid their home and take their property. Gun rights advocates claim that these orders violate a person’s civil rights by violating the Fifth Amendment and the due process clause of the United States Constitution.
A second troubling provision of the bill is the closing of the so-called “boyfriend loophole.” This provision expands on who is prohibited from owning a firearm to someone who is dating or has “recently” dated a person who is prohibited from owning a gun. The idea is to stop a person who is prohibited from possessing a firearm from getting their significant other to buy a gun for them.
The problem is that the law punishes someone for the actions of another person. Also, the future law isn’t clear about what it considers “dating” and doesn’t define “recently.” If someone breaks up with a violent person, the law prevents them, the potential victim, from getting a tool to defend themselves!?
The law also changes who must get a federal firearms license (FFL). The future law requires anyone that buys a gun to make a profit to get an FFL. Many collectors will purchase firearms at a good price that they plan to sell in the future for a profit. Many worry that the new requirements will prevent this practice.
The law also enacts enhanced background checks on gun buyers under 21. The juvenile records of the gun buyer will be examined. The enhanced background checks will take around three days but can take up to ten days. Some believe this provision violates the Equal Protection Claus of the Constitution.
Also, gun owners will lose their gun rights for five years for a domestic violence misdemeanor. This provision expands on who is a prohibited person. If the gun owner doesn’t have any additional charges, the person will have their gun rights restored after five years.
The next stop for the bill is President Joe Biden’s desk, where the President is expected to sign it into law.
About John Crump
John is a NRA instructor and a constitutional activist. John has written about firearms, interviewed people of all walks of life, and on the Constitution. John lives in Northern Virginia with his wife and sons and can be followed on Twitter at @crumpyss, or at www.crumpy.com.


			
                                    
                                    
                                    
                                    
Red Flag law is the new no knock warrant act, innocent people will be harmed from over acting cops and others who want to get even with someone they don’t like.
The republicans who voted for this need to be sent packing down the road.
Bunch of Treasonous, Sh*t eat Dogs!
THIS IS WHY YOU’RE AN ENEMY OF LIBERTY IF YOU STILL SUPPORT THE NRA! THEY [WAYNE LaPIERRE] BANKROLLED THE GUNPOCALYPSE HR7910/S2938!
How much did NRA pay out? MORE THAN 43 MILLION TO ALL OF THE RINOs WHO VOTED FOR THIS!!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=exLYnhs_kCw
ANYONE who persists on simping for NRA is PART OF THE PROBLEM. Yes, YOU, Harold!!
Every congress person who voted for this garbage of a bill can now be called sexist, using the term boyfriend loophole is a form of sexism.
Old poopy pants signed this into law this morning but he wouldn’t stick around for any questions, he is just a puppet for obama.
POLICE IN RED FLAG STATES ARE SAYING TO YOU…..We will do anything for a paycheck serf!
I see NO BASIS for “ backing the blue” in any state with red flag laws. Either they support the constitution and the citizens or they are jack booted thugs standing up for confiscation in exchange for a paycheck.
if you remain a cop in these red flag states you are no different than the kgb or stassi
stop pissing down my back and telling me you will not confiscate guns
you hear me california cops?
Yea in Utah here we’ve got demorat loving traitor romney. He’s a real winner. If you try to compete to primary him out, the mainstream Mormon church and the Rino money bags eliminate the competition. You would think this state would be smarter than that but nope. Might as well have chuckie Schumer.
It just astounds me they crafted some new laws that would have stopped NONE of the supposed ‘mass shootings’ they were designed for. They will only trample the rights of lawful owners through expanded checks and protection (confiscation) orders. As for the ‘boyfriend loophole’.. I don’t even know where to start with that one. Marriages are typically hostile endings but shorter ‘relationships’ often end even more destructively. These reports will EXPLODE and then half the legal firearm owners in this country will be on some ‘list’. I have to inform every woman I move in with that firearms will be… Read more »
The SCOTUS can fix this just like they did the permission slips to carry in New York . Red Flag laws are unconstitutional and the courts will throw this crap out and tell these idiots to try reading the constitution before they legislate more unconstitutional garbage that won’t pass the test in court . Time for 15 RINOs to be looking for a new career out of politics or find themselves on the wrong side of history. The Britts learned this lesson the hard way . Is that the what needs to happen again for thse tyrants to get the… Read more »
“
AlmostALL gun rights groups opposed the bill”.That excludes NSSF, which took “no position”, and NRA, which did NOTHING to stop it because it’s what they WANTED.
No gun rights group calls ATF “our federal partners” as NSSF does.
Had NRA wanted to stop it they’d’ve immediately-publicly downgraded the 10 quisling “R” deal-cutters, then announced there would be immediate downvotes for cloture & floor votes and oppo in the next primary. But LaPew indulged his preferences: wink-nod, kneel-bob, rollover-reacharound. Pols rely on NRA’s 30-yr record of making plausible deniability noises while refusing to cut phony grades.
All of the Republicans that voted for this need to be removed from office sent to the gallows