
U.S.A. –-(AmmoLand.com)- Once again, gun prohibition lobbying groups are locked in silence after a legally-armed 22-year-old intervened quickly to fatally shoot a would-be mass killer who opened fire at the Greenwood Park Mall in Greenwood, Ind., in an action police are hailing as heroic.
“The real hero of the day is the citizen that was lawfully carrying a firearm in that food court and was able to stop the shooter almost as soon as he began,” Greenwood Police Chief Jim Ison told a press briefing Sunday evening.
Reuters quoted Greenwood Mayor Mark Meyers, who said in a prepared statement, “We do know that someone we are calling a ‘Good Samaritan’ was able to shoot the assailant and stop further bloodshed. This person saved lives tonight. I am grateful for his quick action and heroism.”
It is not the first time an armed private citizen has killed a killer. According to the FBI, last year armed citizens stopped six “active shooters.” In four of those cases, the perpetrator was killed. In each case, the gun ban lobby was mum.
CNN noted in its coverage of the shooting, “It’s rare to have an armed bystander attack an active shooter, according to a data analysis published by The New York Times.”
“There were at least 433 active shooter attacks in the US from 2000 to 2021, according to the data analysis,” CNN added. “Active shooter attacks were defined as those in which one or more shooters killed or attempted to kill multiple unrelated people in a populated place.”
“Of those 433 active shooter cases, an armed bystander shot the attacker in 22 of the incidents. In 10 of those, the ‘good guy” was a security guard or an off-duty police officer, the Times reported.”
Three people were killed and two others wounded before the unidentified armed citizen intervened. However, authorities have suggested things could have been much worse if the killer had been able to continue his mayhem.
There is a small bit of irony reported by Reuters, which notes the mall is owned by the Simon Property Group, and they have a “no guns” policy. Here is the mall’s Code of Conduct found online:
While visiting this mall, the following general activities will not be accepted:
- Violations of the law
- Any activity that threatens the safety of our guests, tenants and/or employees
- Any activity that threatens the well-being of the property
- Any activity that disrupts our pleasant, family-oriented shopping environment
- Any activity inconsistent with the general purpose of the property, which is shopping, dining, visiting theaters or offices for business purposes
- Any activity that would disrupt the legitimate business of the property and its tenants
Examples of specific activities that are prohibited include but are not limited to:
- Disruptive profanity, vulgar or threatening language
- Unnecessarily blocking walkways, roadways or storefronts
- Running, horseplay or disorderly conduct of any nature
- Excessive loitering
- Operating unauthorized recreational and/or personal transportation devices in the shopping center
- No firearms or illegal weapons
“The center is a privately owned property. Guests who do not act responsibly may be asked to leave. If they refuse to leave the property, they may be arrested and prosecuted for criminal trespass.”
Clearly, the dead gunman violated virtually all of these rules, while the armed citizen apparently violated only the last tenet.
Greenwood Park Mall posted this statement on its website:
“We grieve for the victims of yesterday’s horrific tragedy at Greenwood Park Mall. Violence has no place in this or any other community. We are grateful for the strong response of the first responders, including the heroic actions of the Good Samaritan who stopped the suspect.”
Indiana this year became a “Constitutional Carry” state.
The Sunday mall shooting carries another piece of irony. NPR is reporting, “Nearly 400 law enforcement officials rushed to mass shooting that left 21 people dead at a Uvalde elementary school but ‘systemic failures’ created a chaotic scene that lasted more than an hour before the gunman was finally confronted and killed, according to a report from investigators released Sunday.”
A lone armed citizen accomplished in moments what took all of those lawmen more than an hour.
The Greenwood Mall killer reportedly had several loaded magazines for his rifle, described initially only as a “long rifle.” It was not immediately known how many rounds he was able to fire before being shot dead by the unidentified armed citizen, who is also being variously described in reports as a “Good Samaritan” and “armed bystander.”
According to the most recent report from the Crime Prevention Research Center, Indiana has more than 1.1 million active concealed carry permits, and now there are likely even more people carrying because of the Constitutional Carry law now in effect. That’s more than 15 percent of the adult population, according to a map at the CPRC website.
The AP reported the hero citizen hails from nearby Bartholomew County. There was no description of his sidearm.
About Dave Workman
Dave Workman is a senior editor at TheGunMag.com and Liberty Park Press, author of multiple books on the Right to Keep & Bear Arms, and formerly an NRA-certified firearms instructor.


We did get statements from Kris Brown from Brady called it “vigilante” and “good guy with a gun” is a myth and Shannon Watts from Moms Demand Action tried to tie it to the new constitutional carry law there.
Both agents are wrong. Watts is diverting from the issue and attempting to confuse people — the bad guy would have brought guns there regardless of the law and the good guy was actually aided by the new law.
“It’s rare to have an armed bystander attack an active shooter, according to a data analysis published by The New York Times.”
It’s rare to have a report published by the left telling the truth.
The Karens are already attacking. They say he’s not a “Good Samaritan” because he murdered the poor misunderstood Mall shooter. You can’t make s#$t like this up.
Marxist/civilian disarmament proponents have to further the agenda, no matter how insane it is.
MSN reports “…Police say the 22-year-old from Bartholomew County had a legal gun permit. However, according to mall policy, the man should not have been carrying his handgun in the mall in the first place….”.
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/crime/armed-good-samaritan-stopped-indiana-mall-shooting-broke-mall-rules/ar-AAZHvm8
My CCW app (Dave Workman’s app) says “…No laws found to enforce ‘no guns’ signs…”.
So yeah, IF they knew he was carrying, they’d ask him to leave.
Gun Free Zones are where only the law abiding are disarmed.
UPDATE: The Brady bunch finally issued this statement yesterday: “Brady President Kris Brown shared: “This shooting underscores the danger that the nation’s unaddressed gun violence crisis poses to all Americans as we attempt to go about our daily lives. No one should fear for their safety on a Sunday trip to the mall; yet hundreds of people in Indiana are now traumatized, and three are dead and two are injured, because we have failed to take action to address gun violence for decades. It is a stroke of luck that a fellow visitor at the mall was able to neutralize the shooter… Read more »
yeah they hate it when an armed citizen ruins their plan…
The man is a hero, the guilty party died before he could murder or maim others, maybe many others, and the media and social media are tyrannical, not wanting to even post the story because it doesn’t fit their ideals. Things like this, a armed man saving lives happens many, many more times than published. Why is that??? If the numbers of dead actually mattered to the government or the media, the drugs coming over the OPEN BORDERS and the open borders themselves would be a priority. Nothing causes greater loss of life here in America and, maybe, in the… Read more »
It is obvious WHY they don’t report on it. It doesn’t fit their narrative of guns bad, people who have them bad. Because in reality MURDER is bad and to stop murder, especially mass murder you need to be able to SHOOT the bad guy.
They quickly pivoted to “how dare he take someone’s life like that….he had no right to kill”.
Mind-numbing.