7th Circuit Court of Appeals Orders Expedited Review in IL ‘Assault’ Weapons & Large Mag Ban

U.S.A. — In a recent development concerning the Second Amendment, the Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals in Chicago, Illinois, has issued a significant order in the now-enjoined cases against the Illinois “assault” weapons ban and large-capacity magazines. This is a significant moment for firearm rights advocates nationwide, potentially setting a significant precedent in the gun control debate. Mark Smith, a Constitutional attorney and member of the United States Supreme Court bar, covered this story in depth in a video embedded above.

In the video, Smith outlines the gravity of the Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals’ latest actions. He explains that the 7th Circut Court has entered an “extremely super fast” expedited briefing schedule for the cases, suggesting that the Court is taking the Second Amendment issues at stake seriously. This move is an attempt by the District Court to ensure that the United States Supreme Court does not interfere with the Illinois gun control laws. These laws, as they stand, enact a ban on AR-15s and other semi-automatic firearms, as well as magazines that can hold more than 10 or 15 rounds.

The three-judge panel overseeing this case consists of Frank Easterbrook and Diane Wood, both known for their less than supportive stance on the Second Amendment and Michael Brennan, a Trump nomination whose stance on this issue remains unclear. According to the expedited court schedule, the briefs from the plaintiffs will be due on June 19th, 2023, followed by the government’s briefs due on June 5th, 2023. The Court will then hear oral arguments on June 29th.

Despite the expedited process, the Circut Court has decided to continue the stay of Judge McGlynn’s earlier order. This means that the existing gun control law involving the magazine ban and the semi-automatic rifle ban will remain in place during the appeal process.

However, this decision is not necessarily reflective of the final ruling, and the panel for the merits of the case may well be different.

For Second Amendment activists, a positive decision, in this case, represents an opportunity to reestablish and reinforce the rights of law-abiding citizens to bear arms, a cornerstone of our Constitution. While the continuation of the existing gun laws during the appeal process may be seen as a setback by some, the urgency demonstrated by the Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals signals recognition of the weight these cases carry.

The potential implications of this case could be far-reaching. Should the ruling go against the Second Amendment, the United States Supreme Court may intervene to correct this, possibly leading to a nationwide nullification of “assault” weapon laws. This serves as a reminder of why many gun control opponents are cautious about the prospect of these cases reaching the Supreme Court.

In the midst of this, it is important to remember that the overarching goal is the protection and upholding of the Second Amendment rights.

Although we would prefer an immediate favorable ruling, a setback might present an opportunity for the Supreme Court to step in, providing the much-needed nationwide constitutional clarity on the issue. As we wait for the proceedings to unfold, the hope is that the legal system will honor the constitutional right to bear arms, reaffirming its role as a safeguard against infringement upon our freedoms.

The course this case takes in the upcoming month could set the tone for future legal battles concerning the Second Amendment. While the gun control laws in Illinois continue for now, the expeditious attention given by the Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals provides a beacon of hope for Second Amendment supporters. As the developments unfurl, we eagerly anticipate the reaffirmation of the citizens’ constitutional right to bear arms, an intrinsic part of the fabric of American freedom.

Subscribe to The Four Boxes Diner for more Second Amendment analysis!

By Fred Riehl and AI technology. Note: This article was generated using AI technology and may contain some automated content aggregation and analysis.

Notify of
Most Voted
Newest Oldest
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
California Uber Alles

These AI articles take a 2 sentence article and make a page out of it. It’s killing me trying to read these.


AI assistance might be compared to empty magnification. How to write a longer article without having to take the responsibility of being a writer. And be paid for that.


Ammoland, either get rid of A.I. or I am gone. You have 14 days.


I am going to check at the bottom of the page for AI. If It is I’ll take a pass on the article.

WTF Ammoland? Is Dylan Mullaney going to start appearing in your ads soon?


Mark Smith is currently the best youtube lawyer commenting from the pro 2A perspective. If you want up to date explanations of the lawfare taking place for and against our liberties, Smith is the one to listen to. He posts several times per week with up to date information.


Regarding Artificial Intelligence and classic interpretation of the news and constitution, AI is here and will not go away until the next sensation replaces it. In my use of AI (specifically ChatGPT), I have found it a very interesting research tool. Using it to replace your real intelligence is not good. Using it to facilitate your acquisition of information is a powerful thing. We are just now starting to understand this thing and why it came in to being. It will change and be morphed by entities trying to control its effect on people. It is much like the introduction… Read more »

Sam in New Hampshire

It’s important to remember that the article is the product of the AUTHOR, not the AI software, and the author has full control over the final writing. Yes, ChatGPT does internet research as directed by the writer, but it’s just a tool to help the article’s writer, like spellcheck.

Knute Knute

If it helps a person out as much as spell check does…. well, that explains why I keep my spell checker turned off. Because it doesn’t bother to correct errors, it prefers to instead take a perfectly fine word like; “reholster”, and turn it into “reupholster” instead! An assistant to me is someone who HELPS me, NOT someone who takes my work and messes it all up!
I have a word for that kind of assistant. It’s called: FIRED! My digital assists have been fired long ago.


You can expect multiple school and church shootings done by kids on ssri drugs in the days leading to the ruling… Every single time…


Groomers will be working overtime!


At least do your own proof read. Check this out “briefs from the plaintiffs will be due on June 19th, 2023, followed by the government’s briefs due on June 5th, 2023” ? Better yet, Write your own damn article.